A Meta-analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews

Based on a meta-analysis, this study aims to clarify the influence of online review valence (i.e., whether reviews in a review set are predominantly positive or negative) on various dependent variables, in particular on perceived usefulness of the reviews and on attitudes toward the product. The findings suggest that review valence affects perceived usefulness in a different way than it affects attitudes. We find an optimum impact level for perceived usefulness and a ceiling effect for attitudes. Primarily negative review sets that include few positive reviews show the strongest effect on perceived usefulness, while positive review sets that include few or no negative reviews are most successful in influencing attitudes. Additionally, review valence has a stronger influence on perceived usefulness when the reviews refer to experience (rather than search) products, and it has a stronger influence on attitudes for unfamiliar (rather than familiar) brands. Finally, the strongest influence of review valence refers to recommendation intentions. These findings provide several implications for researchers and practitioners.

[1]  Jonah Berger,et al.  Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[2]  David C. DeAndrea,et al.  The Influence of Online Comments on Perceptions of Antimarijuana Public Service Announcements on YouTube , 2010 .

[3]  Jae-Nam Lee,et al.  Understanding the product information inference process in electronic word-of-mouth: An objectivity-subjectivity dichotomy perspective , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[4]  Nathalia Purnawirawan,et al.  Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions , 2012 .

[5]  Taesik Lee,et al.  Gender differences in consumers’ perception of online consumer reviews , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res..

[6]  Jason Q. Zhang,et al.  When does electronic word-of-mouth matter? A study of consumer product reviews☆ , 2010 .

[7]  Devendra Potnis,et al.  Culture's consequences: Economic barriers to owning mobile phones experienced by women in India , 2016, Telematics Informatics.

[8]  Jang-Sun Hwang,et al.  How Consumers Evaluate eWOM (Electronic Word-of-Mouth) Messages , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[9]  M. Eisend Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis , 2006 .

[10]  E. Clemons,et al.  When Online Reviews Meet Hyperdifferentiation: A Study of the Craft Beer Industry , 2006 .

[11]  J. Crotts,et al.  The perceived usefulness of blog postings: An extension of the expectancy-disconfirmation paradigm , 2011 .

[12]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  Online Consumer Review: A New Element of Marketing Communications Mix , 2004 .

[13]  Anindita Chakravarty,et al.  The Differential Effects of Online Word-of-Mouth and Critics’ Reviews on Pre-release Movie Evaluation , 2009 .

[14]  Jen-Hung Huang,et al.  Herding in online product choice , 2006 .

[15]  Yubo Chen,et al.  Online Consumer Review: Word-of-Mouth as a New Element of Marketing Communication Mix , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[16]  J. Chiou,et al.  Should a company have message boards on its Web sites? , 2003 .

[17]  Daantje Derks,et al.  Emoticons and social interaction on the Internet: the importance of social context , 2007, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Amit M. Joshi,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Elasticity , 2015 .

[19]  Fred Bronner,et al.  Consumer-Generated versus marketer-generated websites in consumer decision making , 2010 .

[20]  Peter C. Neijens,et al.  "Highly Recommended!" The Content Characteristics and Perceived Usefulness of Online Consumer Reviews , 2011, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Anindya Ghose,et al.  Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets , 2008, Inf. Syst. Res..

[22]  Huaping Chen,et al.  Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[23]  Soon Ang,et al.  Turnover of Information Technology Professionals: A Narrative Review, Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling, and Model Development , 2007, MIS Q..

[24]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[25]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view , 2008, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[26]  B. Sparks,et al.  The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust. , 2011 .

[27]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Online Consumer Reviews: Does Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Hurt More? , 2008, AMCIS.

[28]  Donal E. Carlston,et al.  Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. , 1989 .

[29]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Role of Environment-Based Voluntariness in Information Technology Acceptance , 2009, MIS Q..

[30]  O. John,et al.  Automatic vigilance: the attention-grabbing power of negative social information. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Mira Lee,et al.  Electronic word of mouth (eWOM) , 2009 .

[32]  David Schuff,et al.  What Makes a Helpful Review? A Study of Customer Reviews on Amazon.com , 2010 .

[33]  J. Chiou,et al.  How Much can you Trust Online Information? Cues for Perceived Trustworthiness of Consumer-generated Online Information , 2011 .

[34]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[35]  Qiang Ye,et al.  How Does the Valence of Online Consumer Reviews Matter in Consumer Decision Making? Differences between Search Goods and Experience Goods , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[36]  S. Sen,et al.  Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web , 2007 .

[37]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: The Wrap Effect , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[38]  Dongyoung Sohn,et al.  Disentangling the Effects of Social Network Density on Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) Intention , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[39]  Seoyeon Hong,et al.  Computer-mediated persuasion in online reviews: Statistical versus narrative evidence , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[40]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  The Effects of Online User Reviews on Movie Box Office Performance: Accounting for Sequential Rollout and Aggregation Across Local Markets , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[41]  Bo Yu,et al.  Does the Valence of Online Consumer Reviews matter for Consumer Decision Making? The Moderating Role of Consumer Expertise , 2011, J. Comput..

[42]  R. Nickerson Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[43]  R. Shachar,et al.  On Brands and Word of Mouth , 2013 .

[44]  Sonja Utz,et al.  Consumers rule: How consumer reviews influence perceived trustworthiness of online stores , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[45]  Ray L. Benedicktus The effects of 3rd party consensus information on service expectations and online trust , 2011 .

[46]  I. Vermeulen,et al.  Tried and tested: The impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration , 2009 .

[47]  X. Zhang,et al.  Impact of Online Consumer Reviews on Sales: The Moderating Role of Product and Consumer Characteristics , 2010 .

[48]  Rohini Ahluwalia,et al.  The Effects of Extensions on the Family Brand Name: An Accessibility‐Diagnosticity Perspective , 2000 .

[49]  Eric K. Clemons,et al.  Do Online Reviews Reflect a Product's True Perceived Quality? - An Investigation of Online Movie Reviews Across Cultures , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[50]  Nicholas H. Lurie,et al.  Temporal Contiguity and Negativity Bias in the Impact of Online Word of Mouth , 2013 .

[51]  P. Nelson Information and Consumer Behavior , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[52]  Saad A. Alhoqail,et al.  How Online Product Reviews Affect Retail Sales: A Meta-analysis , 2014 .

[53]  Huiping Huang,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Test of the Spiral of Silence , 2005 .

[54]  Alex S. L. Tsang,et al.  Is a “star” worth a thousand words?: The interplay between product‐review texts and rating valences , 2009 .

[55]  Cheol Park,et al.  Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type , 2009 .

[56]  Chad Edwards,et al.  Computer-Mediated Word-of-Mouth Communication on RateMyProfessors.com: Expectancy Effects on Student Cognitive and Behavioral Learning , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[57]  P. Herr,et al.  Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective , 1991 .

[58]  Nada Nasr Bechwati,et al.  Word of Mouse , 2008 .

[59]  Se-Bum Park,et al.  The Effect of Low- versus High-Variance in Product Reviews on Product Evaluation† , 2013 .

[60]  David Schuff,et al.  Is It the Review or the Reviewer? a Multi-Method Approach to Determine the Antecedents of Online Review Helpfulness , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[61]  Amar Cheema,et al.  Relative importance of online versus offline information for Internet purchases: Product category and Internet experience effects , 2010 .