Predicting Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection for Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Study and Novel Nomogram from TARPSWG

Purpose: The role of surgery for first relapse locally recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS-LR1) is uncertain. We report outcomes of the largest RPS-LR1 series and propose a new prognostic nomogram. Experimental Design: Patients with consecutive RPS-LR1 without distant metastases who underwent resection at 22 centers (2002–2011) were included. Endpoints were disease-free and overall survival (DFS, OS) and crude-cumulative-incidence (CCI) of local/distant recurrence from second surgery. Nomograms predicting DFS and OS from second surgery were developed and validated (calibration plots); discrimination was assessed (Harrell C index). Results: Of 684 patients identified, full prognostic variable data were available for 602. Initial surgery for primary RPS was performed at our institutions in 188 patients (31%) and elsewhere in 414 (69%). At a median follow-up of 119 months [Interquartile range (IQR), 80–169] from initial surgery and 75 months (IQR 50–105) from second surgery, 6-year DFS and OS were 19.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.0–23.0%] and 54.1% (95% CI, 49.8–58.8%), respectively. Recurrence patterns and survival probability were histology-specific, with liposarcoma subtypes having the highest 6-year CCI of second local recurrence (LR, 60.2%–70.9%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) having higher 6-year CCI of distant metastasis (DM, 36.3%). Nomograms included age at second surgery, multifocality, grade, completeness of second surgery, histology, chemotherapy/radiotherapy at first surgery, and number of organs resected at first surgery. OS and DFS nomograms showed good calibration and discriminative ability (C index 0.70 and 0.67, respectively). Conclusions: We developed nomograms to predict DFS and OS for patients undergoing RPS-LR1 resection. Nomograms provide individualized, disease-relevant estimations of survival for RPS-LR1 patients and assist in clinical decisions.

[1]  C. Raut,et al.  Defining the role of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in high‐risk retroperitoneal sarcoma: A multi‐institutional study from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group , 2020, Cancer.

[2]  F. Du,et al.  Development and Validation of an Individualized Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients with Esophageal Carcinoma after Resection , 2020, Journal of Cancer.

[3]  Han Xiao,et al.  Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram for predicting early recurrence after curative resection of stage II/III gastric cancer , 2019, World journal of surgical oncology.

[4]  T. Strate,et al.  Giant retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A case report and literature review , 2019, Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences.

[5]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  Postoperative Morbidity After Radical Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Report From the Transatlantic RPS Working Group , 2017, Annals of surgery.

[6]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  Post‐relapse outcomes after primary extended resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma: A report from the Trans‐Atlantic RPS Working Group , 2017, Cancer.

[7]  K. Hunt,et al.  Recurrence patterns of retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma and impact of salvage surgery , 2017, Journal of surgical oncology.

[8]  J. Blay,et al.  Patterns of care and outcomes of patients with METAstatic soft tissue SARComa in a real-life setting: the METASARC observational study , 2017, BMC Medicine.

[9]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  External validation of a multi‐institutional retroperitoneal sarcoma nomogram , 2016, Cancer.

[10]  S. Bonvalot,et al.  Variability in Patterns of Recurrence After Resection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS): A Report on 1007 Patients From the Multi-institutional Collaborative RPS Working Group , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[11]  Narasimhan P. Agaram,et al.  Histology-based Classification Predicts Pattern of Recurrence and Improves Risk Stratification in Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[12]  T. Group,et al.  Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach from the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group , 2016, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[13]  Seung-Yong Jeong,et al.  Prognostic factors for reoperation of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma: The role of clinicopathological factors other than histologic grade , 2015, Journal of surgical oncology.

[14]  M. Brennan,et al.  Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma , 2014, Journal of surgical oncology.

[15]  T. Group,et al.  Management of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (RPS) in the Adult: A Consensus Approach From the Trans-Atlantic RPS Working Group , 2014, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  Luigi Mariani,et al.  Outcome prediction in primary resected retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: histology-specific overall survival and disease-free survival nomograms built on major sarcoma center data sets. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  L. Mariani,et al.  Histology‐specific nomogram for primary retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma , 2010, Cancer.

[18]  M. Heslin,et al.  Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma: impact of biology and therapy on outcomes. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[19]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  Permutation importance: a corrected feature importance measure , 2010, Bioinform..

[20]  K. Hunt,et al.  Postoperative nomogram for survival of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma treated with curative intent. , 2010, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  L. Qin,et al.  Predicting Outcome by Growth Rate of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: The One Centimeter Per Month Rule , 2009, Annals of surgery.

[22]  J. Norton,et al.  The Value of Surgery for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma , 2009, Sarcoma.

[23]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[24]  J. Coindre Grading of soft tissue sarcomas: review and update. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[25]  M Mazumdar,et al.  Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for primary high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcoma. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[27]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[28]  F. Harrell,et al.  Prognostic/Clinical Prediction Models: Multivariable Prognostic Models: Issues in Developing Models, Evaluating Assumptions and Adequacy, and Measuring and Reducing Errors , 2005 .

[29]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[30]  R. Simon,et al.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.