The patient and the computer in the primary care consultation

OBJECTIVE Studies of the doctor-patient relationship have focused on the elaboration of power and/or authority using a range of techniques to study the encounter between doctor and patient. The widespread adoption of computers by doctors brings a third party into the consultation. While there has been some research into the way doctors view and manage this new relationship, the behavior of patients in response to the computer is rarely studied. In this paper, the authors use Goffman's dramaturgy to explore patients' approaches to the doctor's computer in the consultation, and its influence on the patient-doctor relationship. DESIGN Observational study of Australian general practice. 141 consultations from 20 general practitioners were videotaped and analyzed using a hermeneutic framework. RESULTS Patients negotiated the relationship between themselves, the doctor, and the computer demonstrating two themes: dyadic (dealing primarily with the doctor) or triadic (dealing with both computer and doctor). Patients used three signaling behaviors in relation to the computer on the doctor's desk (screen watching, screen ignoring, and screen excluding) to influence the behavior of the doctor. Patients were able to draw the doctor to the computer, and used the computer to challenge doctor's statements. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that in consultations where doctors use computers, the computer can legitimately be regarded as part of a triadic relationship. Routine use of computers in the consultation changes the doctor-patient relationship, and is altering the distribution of power and authority between doctor and patient.

[1]  Tim Usherwood,et al.  ABC of psychological medicine: The consultation , 2002 .

[2]  Peter Blanck,et al.  Nonverbal communication in the clinical context , 1986 .

[3]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[4]  N. Britten,et al.  System, lifeworld and doctor-patient interaction: issues of trust in a changing world , 2001 .

[5]  J. Bensing,et al.  Patient-directed gaze as a tool for discovering and handling psychosocial problems in general practice , 1995 .

[6]  Derek Scott,et al.  Triadic Relationship between Doctor, Computer and Patient , 1996, Interact. Comput..

[7]  A. Shachak,et al.  The impact of electronic medical records on patient-doctor communication during consultation: a narrative literature review. , 2009, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[8]  David W. Bates,et al.  The use of health information technology in seven nations , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[9]  G AndersonJames,et al.  The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the PhysicianPatient Relationship , 2003 .

[10]  P. Kummervold,et al.  Patients Who Use E-Mediated Communication With Their Doctor: New Constructions of Trust in the Patient-Doctor Relationship , 2006, Qualitative health research.

[11]  G. Poggi.  Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology , 1969 .

[12]  J. Curran.  The Doctor, his Patient and the Illness , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  T. Timpka,et al.  Comparison of patients' and doctors' comments on video-recorded consultations. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of primary health care.

[14]  Simon de Lusignan,et al.  Getting Seamless Care Right from the Beginning - Integrating Computers into the Human Interaction , 2010, EFMI-STC.

[15]  M. Stewart,et al.  Doctor-patient communication: the Toronto consensus statement. , 1991, BMJ.

[16]  S. Buetow,et al.  Power Issues in the Doctor-Patient Relationship , 2004, Health Care Analysis.

[17]  Christopher Pearce,et al.  A visual study of computers on doctors' desks. , 2008, Informatics in primary care.

[18]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship-Reply , 1992 .

[19]  Richard M. Frankel,et al.  Integrating biopsychosocial and relationship-centered care into mainstream medical practice: A challenge that continues to produce positive results. , 2005 .

[20]  N. Ainsworth-Vaughn.  Claiming power in doctor-patient talk , 1998 .

[21]  Jie Huang,et al.  Research Paper: Health Information Technology and Physician-Patient Interactions: Impact of Computers on Communication during Outpatient Primary Care Visits , 2005, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[22]  I. Purves,et al.  Facing future challenges in general practice: a clinical method with computer support. , 1996, Family practice.

[23]  J. Middleton.  The exceptional potential of the consultation revisited. , 1989, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[24]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  Frame Analysis Reconsidered@@@Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. , 1981 .

[25]  Tim Usherwood,et al.  ABC of psychological medicine , 2002 .

[26]  John Hsu,et al.  Effects of exam-room computing on clinician-patient communication , 2005, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[27]  E. Emanuel,et al.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship. , 1992, JAMA.

[28]  Howard Waitzkin,et al.  The Politics of Medical Encounters: How Patients and Doctors Deal With Social Problems , 1991 .

[29]  Kieran McGlade,et al.  Do general practitioners change how they use the computer during consultations with a significant psychological component? , 2008, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[30]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[31]  M. A. Bowman.  Good physician-patient relationship = improved patient outcome? , 1991, The Journal of family practice.

[32]  Christopher Pearce,et al.  Analysing the doctor-patient-computer relationship: the use of video data. , 2006, Informatics in primary care.

[33]  E. Balint.  The possibilities of patient-centered medicine. , 1969, The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[34]  Mark Srite,et al.  Information technology and culture: Identifying fragmentary and holistic perspectives of culture , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[35]  T. Coleman.  Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. , 2000, Family practice.

[36]  J. Kett,et al.  The Social Transformation of American Medicine , 1983 .

[37]  C. Charles,et al.  Shared treatment decision making: what does it mean to physicians? , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  Christopher Pearce,et al.  Algorithmic logic meets patient centredness , 2006 .

[39]  Nick Booth,et al.  Identification of high-quality consultation practice in primary care: the effects of computer use on doctor-patient rapport. , 2004, Informatics in primary care.

[40]  C. Charles,et al.  Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. , 1999, Social science & medicine.

[41]  G. Scambler.  Habermas, Critical Theory and Health , 2001 .

[42]  Nancy Vuckovic,et al.  Clinician style and examination room computers: a video ethnography. , 2005, Family medicine.

[43]  M. Argyle,et al.  EYE-CONTACT, DISTANCE AND AFFILIATION. , 1965, Sociometry.

[44]  T. Szasz,et al.  A contribution to the philosophy of medicine; the basic models of the doctor-patient relationship. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of internal medicine.

[45]  A. Ziv,et al.  Primary Care Physicians’ Use of an Electronic Medical Record System: A Cognitive Task Analysis , 2009, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[46]  S. French,et al.  Patient-centred Medicine Transforming the clinical method , 2003 .

[47]  Howard Brody,et al.  The Healer's Power , 1992 .

[48]  G. Eysenbach,et al.  The Impact of CyberHealthcare on the Physician–Patient Relationship , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.