Influence of group size on students' participation in online discussion forums

This study attempts to examine how students participate and interact in different discussion modules organized with different group size in an online environment. It adopts a case study methodology where full semester online course with two small-group and three class-wide discussion forums was examined. The researcher counted the number of messages and hits (i.e. the number of students' clicks on other messages) and analyzed that to classify the level of interactivity of every individual message into four categories, i.e. independent, quasi-interactive, interactive (elaborative) and interactive (negotiating). It found that the class guidelines and active encouragement by the instructor had contributed to the high number of total messages and hits representing students' overall participation in all discussion forums. However, large discussion forums in the course had their limitations in promoting higher level of interactivity among the students. On the other hand, two small-group discussion forums had a higher number (by 21%) of enhanced interactivity (elaborating and negotiating mode). The study then concludes that a high quality participation in a large online class could be effected through sub-grouping. It further alludes that other practices should be taken into consideration to promote interactivity in discussion.

[1]  Jim Hewitt.  Toward an Understanding of How Threads Die in Asynchronous Computer Conferences , 2005 .

[2]  J. Patel,et al.  Students' Perspective on the Impact of a Web-based Discussion Forum on Student Learning , 2006, Proceedings. Frontiers in Education. 36th Annual Conference.

[3]  M. J. W. Thomas,et al.  Learning within incoherent structures: the space of online discussion forums , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[4]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Talk to me: foundations for successful individual-group interactions in online communities , 2006, CHI.

[5]  James N. Britton,et al.  Language, the learner, and the school , 1969 .

[6]  Jungjoo Kim,et al.  Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Khe Foon Hew,et al.  Attracting student participation in asynchronous online discussions: A case study of peer facilitation , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Charalambos Vrasidas,et al.  Factors influencing interaction in an online course , 1999 .

[9]  Matthew Hughes,et al.  Assessing social presence in online discussion groups: a replication study , 2007 .

[10]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students’ computer-supported collaborative learning , 2003 .

[11]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Membership Size, Communication Activity, and Sustainability: A Resource-Based Model of Online Social Structures , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Elizabeth A. City.  Talking to Learn. , 2014 .

[13]  A. Bangert.  The Seven Principles of Good Practice: A framework for evaluating on-line teaching , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[14]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Empirical evidence of information overload constraining chat channel community interactions , 2008, CSCW.

[15]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Contextual Factors That Influence ALN Effectiveness , 2004 .

[16]  Avner Caspi,et al.  The influence of group size on nonmandatory asynchronous instructional discussion groups , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[17]  Robert S. Weisskirch,et al.  Virtual Discussion: Understanding College Students' Electronic Bulletin Board Use , 2003 .

[18]  Lynette Nagel,et al.  Supersizing e-learning: What a CoI survey reveals about teaching presence in a large online class , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Alfred P. Rovai,et al.  Facilitating online discussions effectively , 2007, Internet High. Educ..

[20]  Stefan Hrastinski,et al.  A theory of online learning as online participation , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Seven Principles of Effective Teaching: A Practical Lens for Evaluating Online Courses , 2001 .

[22]  A. P. Rovai.  Building Sense of Community at a Distance , 2002, Distances et médiations des savoirs.

[23]  Gilad Ravid,et al.  Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction spaces: a theoretical model and empirical exploration , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[24]  Ali Farhan AbuSeileek,et al.  The effect of computer-assisted cooperative learning methods and group size on the EFL learners' achievement in communication skills , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Jo Davies,et al.  Performance in e-learning: online participation and student grades , 2005, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  Lawrence A. Tomei.  The Impact of Online Teaching on Faculty Load: Computing the Ideal Class Size for Online Courses , 2006 .

[27]  William J. Gibbs,et al.  Indicators of constructivist principles in internet-based courses , 2003, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[28]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[29]  James Boyle,et al.  Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings , 2003 .

[30]  Selma Vonderwell,et al.  Factors that Influence Participation In Online Learning , 2005 .