Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought

The many selection criteria that have been proposed to increase drought resistance of our crops have had little, if any, impact on improving crop yields in dry environments. There are several likely reasons for this lack of success. Some of these are: (i) criteria proposed have been related more to survival mechanisms under drought than to productivity, (ii) criteria are inappropriate to the target environment, and (iii) criteria are temporal and are therefore likely to have minimal impact on growth and yield over the entire lifecycle. Another important reason is that breeders have not been convinced the proposed criteria will be successful as they are too difficult to measure. On the other hand, empirical breeding programmes to improve yield under drought have been successful. Surprisingly, some of the greatest successes have been achieved by breeding in environments where water is non-limiting. This paper reviews breeding approaches to improve yield under drought. It focuses on critical factors that must be considered to identify likely plant attributes that can be targeted. These factors, their link with yield, the nature of the target environment, the level of organisation where the trait is expressed are discussed. Three quite different examples are given to emphasize the above considerations and which show substantial promise in targeting traits to improve yield under drought. They are drought at flowering, improving transpiration efficiency and improving early leaf area development.

[1]  I. M. Atkins,et al.  The Influence of Awns on Yield and Certain Morphological Characters of Wheat1 , 1955 .

[2]  E. A. Hurd,et al.  TECHNIQUES USED IN PRODUCING WASCANA WHEAT , 1972 .

[3]  J. Passioura,et al.  Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. , 1977 .

[4]  R. Richards,et al.  Variation between and within species of rapeseed (Brassica campestris and B. napus) in response to drought stress. II.* Growth and development under natural drought stresses , 1978 .

[5]  Neil C. Turner,et al.  Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress , 1980 .

[6]  L. T. Evans,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHESIS, CARBON PARTITIONING, AND YIELD , 1981 .

[7]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  On the Relationship Between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and the Intercellular Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Leaves , 1982 .

[8]  J. Passioura Water in the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum , 1982 .

[9]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Some physiological aspects of the domestication and improvement of rice (Oryza spp.) , 1983 .

[10]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Isotopic Composition of Plant Carbon Correlates With Water-Use Efficiency of Wheat Genotypes , 1984 .

[11]  R. Richards,et al.  Glaucousness in Wheat: Its Development and Effect on Water-use Efficiency, Gas Exchange and Photosynthetic Tissue Temperatures* , 1986 .

[12]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination is positively correlated with grain yield and dry matter production in field-grown wheat , 1987 .

[13]  R. Richards,et al.  A Breeding Program to Reduce the Diameter of the Major Xylem Vessel in the Seminal Roots of Wheat and its Effect on Grain Yield in Rain-fed Environments , 1989 .

[14]  R. Belford,et al.  Growth, development and light interception of old and modern wheat cultivars in a Mediterranean-type environment , 1989 .

[15]  T. Carter,et al.  Field Drought Tolerance of a Soybean Plant Introduction , 1990 .

[16]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. , 1990 .

[17]  Jeffrey W. White,et al.  Associations between productivity, root growth and carbon isotope discrimination in Phaseolus vulgaris under water deficit. , 1990 .

[18]  R. Richards Crop improvement for temperate Australia: Future opportunities , 1991 .

[19]  R. Richards The Effect of Dwarfing Genes in Spring Wheat in Dry Environments. II.* Growth, Water Use and Water-use Efficiency , 1992 .

[20]  R. Richards The effect of dwarfing genes in spring wheat in dry environments, 1. Agronomic characteristics , 1992 .

[21]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Transpiration ratio and plant mineral content are related among genotypes of a range of species , 1992 .

[22]  E. Acevedo Potential of Carbon Isotope Discrimination as a Selection Criterion in Barley Breeding , 1993 .

[23]  A. Condon,et al.  Exploiting Genetic Variation in Transpiration Efficiency in Wheat: An Agronomic View , 1993 .

[24]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behavior , 1993 .

[25]  Gregory O. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. III. Responses in drought-adaptive physiological and morphological traits , 1993 .

[26]  H. F. Mayland,et al.  Ash, Carbon Isotope Discrimination, and Silicon as Estimators of Transpiration Efficiency in Crested Wheatgrass , 1993 .

[27]  R. Richards,et al.  Relationships between carbon isotope discrimination, water use efficiency and transpiration efficiency for dryland wheat , 1993 .

[28]  A. Condon,et al.  Challenges Ahead in Using Carbon Isotope Discrimination in Plant-Breeding Programs , 1993 .

[29]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in lowland tropical maize. I. Responses in grain yield, biomass, and radiation utilization , 1993 .

[30]  R. Richards,et al.  Variation in temperate cereals in rainfed environments III. Water use and water-use efficiency , 1994 .

[31]  R. Percy,et al.  Genetic variability for stomatal conductance in Pima cotton and its relation to improvements of heat adaptation. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  R. Richards,et al.  Variation in temperate cereals in rainfed environments I. Grain yield, biomass and agronomic characteristics , 1994 .

[33]  A. Miranda,et al.  Choosing evaluation environments to increase wheat grain yield under drought conditions , 1994 .

[34]  R. Richards,et al.  Variation in temperate cereals in rainfed environments II. Phasic development and growth , 1994 .

[35]  D. Johnson,et al.  Near infrared reflectance spectroscopy estimation of 13C discrimination in forages. , 1995 .

[36]  R. B. Austin,et al.  Carbon isotope discrimination and grain yield for three bread wheat germplasm groups grown at different levels of water stress , 1995 .

[37]  R. E. Williamson,et al.  Seed and Seedling Characteristics Contributing to Variation in Early Vigor among Temperate Cereals , 1996 .

[38]  R. Richards,et al.  Coleoptile tiller development is associated with fast early vigour in wheat , 2004, Euphytica.

[39]  S. Ceccarelli Specific adaptation and breeding for marginal conditions , 1994, Euphytica.