Boundary conditions and behavior of the macroscopic fundamental diagram based network traffic dynamics: A control systems perspective

Macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD), establishing a mapping from the network flow accumulation to the trip completion rate, has been widely used for aggregate modeling of urban traffic network dynamics. Based on the MFD framework, extensive research has been dedicated to devising perimeter control strategies to protect the network from gridlock. Recent research has revealed that the stochasticity and time-varying nature of travel demand can introduce significant scattering in the MFD, thus reducing the definition of the MFD dynamics. However, this type of demand effect on the behavior of the MFD dynamics has not been well studied. In this article, we investigate such effect and propose some appropriate boundary conditions to ensure that the MFD dynamics are well-defined. These boundary conditions can be regarded as travel demand adjustment in traffic rationing. For perimeter control design, a set of sufficient conditions that guarantee the controllability, an important but yet untouched issue, are derived for general multi-region MFD systems. The stability of the network equilibrium and convergence of the network dynamics are then analyzed in the sense of Lyapunov. Both theoretical and numerical results indicate that the network traffic converges to the desired uncongested equilibrium under proper boundary conditions in conjunction with proper control measures. The results are consistent with some existing studies and offer a control systems perspective regarding the demand-oriented behavior analysis of MFD-based network traffic dynamics. A surprising finding is that if the control purpose is to regulate the traffic to a desired level of service, the perimeter control gain can be simply chosen as its desired steady state, that is, the control gain is a constant and can be implemented as proportional control. This property sheds light on the road pricing design based on the MFD framework by minimizing the gap between the actual traffic state and the desired traffic state.

[1]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Dynamics of heterogeneity in urban networks: aggregated traffic modeling and hierarchical control , 2015 .

[2]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Optimal Perimeter Control for Two Urban Regions With Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A Model Predictive Approach , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Adaptive perimeter traffic control of urban road networks based on MFD model with time delays , 2016 .

[4]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Hysteresis Phenomena of a Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram in Freeway Networks , 2011 .

[5]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Enhancing model-based feedback perimeter control with data-driven online adaptive optimization , 2017 .

[6]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  THE CELL TRANSMISSION MODEL, PART II: NETWORK TRAFFIC , 1995 .

[7]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Time-dependent area-based pricing for multimodal systems with heterogeneous users in an agent-based environment , 2016 .

[8]  Katsuhiko Ogata,et al.  Modern Control Engineering , 1970 .

[9]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  Clockwise Hysteresis Loops in the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2010 .

[10]  Lele Zhang,et al.  A comparative study of Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams of arterial road networks governed by adaptive traffic signal systems , 2011, 1112.3761.

[11]  S. P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Routing Strategies Based on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram , 2012 .

[12]  Jack Haddad.  Robust Constrained Control of Uncertain Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram Networks , 2015 .

[13]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Dynamic macroscopic simulation of on-street parking search: A trip-based approach , 2017 .

[14]  Markos Papageorgiou,et al.  Urban congestion gating control based on reduced operational network fundamental diagrams , 2013 .

[15]  Jack Haddad,et al.  Robust perimeter control design for an urban region , 2014 .

[16]  Zhongzhen Yang,et al.  Linear complementarity system approach to macroscopic freeway traffic modelling: uniqueness and convexity , 2016 .

[17]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Approximating Dynamic Equilibrium Conditions with Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams , 2014 .

[18]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Feedback Perimeter Control for Heterogeneous Urban Networks Using Adaptive Optimization , 2015, 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  Meead Saberi,et al.  Urban Network Gridlock: Theory, Characteristics, and Dynamics , 2013 .

[20]  Michele D. Simoni,et al.  Marginal cost congestion pricing based on the network fundamental diagram , 2015 .

[21]  Roberto Horowitz,et al.  Behavior of the cell transmission model and effectiveness of ramp metering , 2008 .

[22]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks , 2013 .

[23]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Optimal and robust strategies for freeway traffic management under demand and supply uncertainties: an overview and general theory , 2014 .

[24]  Agachai Sumalee,et al.  Robust perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: A control-Lyapunov function approach , 2018, Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

[25]  Andy H.F. Chow,et al.  Automatic calibration of fundamental diagram for first‐order macroscopic freeway traffic models , 2016 .

[26]  N. Geroliminis,et al.  Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: Some experimental findings - eScholarship , 2007 .

[27]  Rashid A. Waraich,et al.  A dynamic cordon pricing scheme combining the Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram and an agent-based traffic model , 2012 .

[28]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Dynamic clustering and propagation of congestion in heterogeneously congested urban traffic networks , 2017 .

[29]  Hai Yang,et al.  Managing network mobility with tradable credits , 2011 .

[30]  Vikash V. Gayah,et al.  A Kinematic Wave Approach to Traffic Statics and Dynamics in a Double-Ring Network , 2013 .

[31]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  Estimating MFDs in Simple Networks with Route Choice. , 2013 .

[32]  R. Horowitz,et al.  Methodological calibration of the cell transmission model , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[33]  Carlos F. Daganzo,et al.  Urban Gridlock: Macroscopic Modeling and Mitigation Approaches , 2007 .

[34]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  The spatial variability of vehicle densities as determinant of urban network capacity , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  Nikolas Geroliminis,et al.  Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway , 2013 .

[36]  Nikolaos Geroliminis,et al.  On the stability of traffic perimeter control in two-region urban cities , 2012 .

[37]  Ludovic Leclercq,et al.  Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: A cross-comparison of estimation methods , 2014 .

[38]  Jack Haddad.  Optimal coupled and decoupled perimeter control in one-region cities , 2017 .

[39]  C. Daganzo,et al.  Macroscopic relations of urban traffic variables: Bifurcations, multivaluedness and instability , 2011 .

[40]  W. Haddad,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Control: A Lyapunov-Based Approach , 2008 .

[41]  Ziyou Gao,et al.  Congestion mechanism and demand adjustment strategies for double-cell system with bottlenecks , 2015 .