Smart Institutional Intervention in the Adoption of Digital Infrastructure: The Case of Government Cloud Computing in Oman

Cloud computing technology presents a case of centralised digital infrastructure that requires adherence to standards and planned approach for its adoption and implementation. There is little knowledge on how institutions could influence the successful migration to the cloud considering the known challenges of adopting technology infrastructure. This research questions: How can institutions positively influence the adoption of cloud computing services? It examines the case of adopting government cloud computing in Sultanate of Oman. It adopts concepts from institutional theory as a theoretical lens to synthesis and explains empirical results. The study shows the practices that exerted institutional forces and the role they play in the successful adoption and migration to cloud services. It reveals that not all institutional forces carry equal weight in their influence, and this depends on the context of adoption. In the case study, we found that both coercive and mimetic forces to be playing prominent roles in pushing the adoption and migration to the cloud forward easing potential resistance from normative forces. We conceptualise this as a smart intervention that took the context of adoption seriously into consideration and was tailored accordingly. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

[1]  Federico Iannacci,et al.  When is an information infrastructure? Investigating the emergence of public sector information infrastructures , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  W. Scott,et al.  Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory , 2008 .

[3]  Imre Petkovic,et al.  CRM in the cloud , 2010, IEEE 8th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics.

[4]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Rules, Practices, and Information Technology: A Trifecta of Organizational Regulation , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  P. Mell,et al.  SP 800-145. The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[6]  O Hanseth,et al.  Design as Bootstrapping. On the Evolution of ICT Networks in Health Care , 2003, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[7]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Rob Procter,et al.  The Development of Data Infrastructures for eHealth: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  From tool to Gestell , 2013 .

[10]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructure standards , 1997 .

[11]  Ole Hanseth,et al.  Reflexive Standardization: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making , 2006, MIS Q..

[12]  Alex Z. Kondra,et al.  Institutional processes of organizational culture , 2009 .

[13]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Innovation in Information Infrastructures: Introduction to the Special Issue , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Trans-situated use of integrated information systems , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Mache Creeger,et al.  Cloud Computing: An Overview , 2009, ACM Queue.

[16]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[17]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  INSTITUTIONAL EVOLUTION AND CHANGE: ENVIRONMENTALISM AND THE US CHEMICAL INDUSTRY , 1999 .

[18]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Inter-Organizational Knowledge Transfer: Current Themes and Future Prospects , 2008 .

[19]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[20]  Faith-Michael E. Uzoka,et al.  A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa , 2017, Information Systems Frontiers.

[21]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[22]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[23]  Bryan Marshall,et al.  Does Sample Size Matter in Qualitative Research?: A Review of Qualitative Interviews in is Research , 2013, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[24]  L. Davidson,et al.  Understanding and Evaluating Qualitative Research∗ , 2002, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[25]  P. Mell,et al.  The NIST Definition of Cloud Computing , 2011 .

[26]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Institutional isomorphism and change: the national programme for IT – 10 years on , 2012, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Of Information Systems School of Information Systems 2-2018 A Metrics Suite of Cloud Computing Adoption Readiness , 2019 .

[28]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[29]  M. D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Business & Management , 2008 .

[30]  Subhajyoti Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Cloud computing - The business perspective , 2011, Decis. Support Syst..

[31]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Desperately Seeking the Infrastructure in IS Research: Conceptualization of "Digital Convergence" As Co-Evolution of Social and Technical Infrastructures , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[32]  Muthu Ramachandran,et al.  Towards Achieving Data Security with the Cloud Computing Adoption Framework , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing.

[33]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[35]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Jr. Harry Katzan.  On The Privacy Of Cloud Computing , 2011, BIOINFORMATICS 2011.

[37]  Lynne G. Zucker,et al.  Institutional Analyses of Organizations: Legitimate but not Institutionalized , 1994 .

[38]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[39]  Andrew J. Flanagin.  Social pressures on organizational website adoption , 2000 .

[40]  Mary Tate,et al.  A Descriptive Literature Review and Classification of Cloud Computing Research , 2012, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[43]  Uwe Flick,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 2008 .

[44]  Federico Iannacci,et al.  Routines, artefacts and technological change: investigating the transformation of criminal justice in England and Wales , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[45]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Cloud computing research in the IS discipline: A citation/co-citation analysis , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[47]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  Eriks Sneiders,et al.  Cloud Computing Adoption Factors in Turkish Large Scale Enterprises , 2014, PACIS.

[49]  Rajkumar Buyya,et al.  Cloud Computing Principles and Paradigms , 2011 .

[50]  Richard Boateng,et al.  Cloud computing research: A review of research themes, frameworks, methods and future research directions , 2018, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[51]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  THE BUSINESS PERSPECTIVE OF CLOUD COMPUTING: ACTORS, ROLES, AND VALUE NETWORKS , 2010, ECIS 2010.

[52]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management , 2006, Comput. Ind..

[53]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Configurable Politics and Asymmetric Integration: Health e-Infrastructures in India , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Eric Monteiro,et al.  Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility , 1996 .

[55]  Xiao Liu,et al.  A data placement strategy in scientific cloud workflows , 2010, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[56]  Ali Sunyaev,et al.  Determinant factors of cloud-sourcing decisions: reflecting on the IT outsourcing literature in the era of cloud computing , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[57]  W. Chismar,et al.  The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry , 2007 .

[58]  Sujeet Kumar Sharma,et al.  Predicting motivators of cloud computing adoption: A developing country perspective , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[59]  Hema Date,et al.  Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model , 2015, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[60]  Jyoti M. Bhat.  Adoption of Cloud Computing by SMEs in India: A study of the Institutional Factors , 2013, AMCIS.

[61]  Qing Hu,et al.  The role of external and internal influences on information systems security - a neo-institutional perspective , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[62]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Institutional Effects on the IT Outsourcing Market: Analysing Clients, Suppliers and Staff Transfer in Germany and the UK , 2006 .

[63]  David H. Brown,et al.  Priorities, policies and practice of e-government in a developing country context: ICT infrastructure and diffusion in Jamaica , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[64]  Faith-Michael E. Uzoka,et al.  Conceptualizing a model for adoption of cloud computing in education , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[65]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Taking Industry Seriously in Information Systems Research , 2005, MIS Q..

[66]  Tejaswini Herath,et al.  Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: Role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[67]  Roger Clarke,et al.  Privacy and consumer risks in cloud computing , 2010, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[68]  O. Hanseth,et al.  From tool to Gestell: agendas for managing the information infrastructure , 1998 .

[69]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[70]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[71]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[72]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[73]  Rahul Verma.  Empirical Test of the Dividend Discount Model’s Forecasting Power , 2020 .

[74]  James J. Jiang,et al.  Rethinking the role of security in client satisfaction with Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) providers , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[75]  William Yeoh,et al.  Security and Privacy Concerns for Australian SMEs Cloud Adoption: Empirical Study of Metropolitan Vs Regional SMEs , 2016, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[76]  T. Kostova,et al.  Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions , 2008 .

[77]  Chinyao Low,et al.  Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[78]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[79]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 1997, MIS Q..

[80]  L. Youseff,et al.  Toward a Unified Ontology of Cloud Computing , 2008, 2008 Grid Computing Environments Workshop.

[81]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing , 1997 .

[82]  Daniel Gozman,et al.  The role of Investment Management Systems in regulatory compliance: a Post-Financial Crisis study of displacement mechanisms , 2014, J. Inf. Technol..

[83]  Dave Durkee,et al.  Why cloud computing will never be free , 2010, ACM Queue.

[84]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[85]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Nature of Theory in Information Systems , 2006, MIS Q..

[86]  Jørn Braa,et al.  DEVELOPING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES THE FLEXIBLE STANDARDS STRATEGY , 2006 .

[87]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[88]  Xiao Liu,et al.  On-demand minimum cost benchmarking for intermediate dataset storage in scientific cloud workflow systems , 2011, J. Parallel Distributed Comput..

[89]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Data matters in IS theory building , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[90]  Petter Nielsen,et al.  Control Devolution as Information Infrastructure Design Strategy: A case study of a content service platform for mobile phones in Norway , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[91]  Dag I. K. Sjøberg,et al.  Confronting the myth of rapid obsolescence in computing research , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[92]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  Special issue on institutional theory in information systems research: contextualizing the IT artefact , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[93]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[94]  Latifa Ben Arfa Rabai,et al.  A Security Framework for Secure Cloud Computing Environments , 2016, Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput..

[95]  Thomas A. Finholt,et al.  The Long Now of Technology Infrastructure: Articulating Tensions in Development , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[96]  Michael I. Barrett,et al.  Information Infrastructure Development and Governance as Collective Action , 2015, Inf. Syst. Res..

[97]  Gunnar Ellingsen,et al.  Generification by Translation: Designing Generic Systems in Context of the Local , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[98]  Ronald Batenburg,et al.  Sticking to standards; technical and other isomorphic pressures in deploying ERP-systems , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[99]  Ya-Ching Lee,et al.  Adoption Intention of Cloud Computing at the Firm Level , 2019, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[100]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Contextualising the IT artefact: towards a wider research agenda for IS using institutional theory , 2009, Inf. Technol. People.

[101]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[102]  Mo Adam Mahmood,et al.  Impact of Cloud Computing Adoption on Firm Stock Price - An Empirical Research , 2014, AMCIS.

[103]  Sue Newell,et al.  Paradoxical effects of institutionalisation on the strategic awareness of technology in organisations , 2010, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[104]  Andrew P. McAfee,et al.  The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. , 2007, Health affairs.