Association of Adjuvant Chemotherapy With Survival in Patients With Stage II or III Gastric Cancer

Importance The current staging system of gastric cancer is not adequate for defining a prognosis and predicting the patients most likely to benefit from chemotherapy. Objective To construct a survival prediction model based on specific tumor and patient characteristics that enables individualized predictions of the net survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants In this multicenter retrospective analysis, a survival prediction model was constructed using data from a training cohort of 746 patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer who satisfied the study’s inclusion criteria and underwent surgery between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2012, at Nanfang Hospital in Guangzhou, China. Patient and tumor characteristics were included as covariates, and their association with overall survival and disease-free survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy was assessed. The model was internally validated for discrimination and calibration using bootstrap resampling. To externally validate the model, data were included from a validation cohort of 973 patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria and underwent surgery at First Affiliated Hospital in Guangzhou, China, and at West China Hospital of Sichuan Hospital in Chendu, China, between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2009. Data were analyzed from July 10, 2016, to September 1, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures Concordance index and decision curve analysis for each measure associated with postoperative overall survival and disease-free survival. Results Of the 1719 patients analyzed, 1183 (68.8%) were men and 536 (31.2%) were women and the median (interquartile range) age was 57 (49-66) years. Age, location, differentiation, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen 19-9, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with overall survival and disease-free survival, with P < .05. The survival prediction model demonstrated good calibration and discrimination, with relatively high bootstrap-corrected concordance indexes in the training and validation cohorts. In the validation cohort, the concordance index for overall survival was 0.693 (95% CI, 0.671-0.715) and for disease-free survival was 0.704 (95% CI, 0.681-0.728). Two nomograms and a calculating tool were built on the basis of specific input variables to estimate an individual’s net survival gain attributable to adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions and Relevance The survival prediction model can be used to make individualized predictions of the expected survival benefit from the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage II or stage III gastric cancer.

[1]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable Gastric Cancer , 2009 .

[2]  M. Kattan,et al.  Postoperative nomogram for disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Yasuo Ohashi,et al.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Mike West,et al.  Prognostic index score and clinical prediction model of local regional recurrence after mastectomy in breast cancer patients. , 2006, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  A. Keats The ASA classification of physical status--a recapitulation. , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[6]  Yanqi Huang,et al.  Development and Validation of a Radiomics Nomogram for Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Five-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 versus surgery alone in stage II or III gastric cancer. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[9]  P. Laurén,et al.  THE TWO HISTOLOGICAL MAIN TYPES OF GASTRIC CARCINOMA: DIFFUSE AND SO-CALLED INTESTINAL-TYPE CARCINOMA. AN ATTEMPT AT A HISTO-CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION. , 1965, Acta pathologica et microbiologica Scandinavica.

[10]  Joseph A. Smith,et al.  Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: A nomogram for staging prostate cancer , 2004 .

[11]  R. Molina,et al.  Carcinoembryonic antigen in staging and follow-up of patients with solid tumors. , 1995, Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine.

[12]  Y. Kodera,et al.  Development and external validation of a nomogram for overall survival after curative resection in serosa-negative, locally advanced gastric cancer. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[13]  W. Kim,et al.  Nomogram predicting long-term survival after d2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Y. Bang,et al.  Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[15]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.

[16]  Frank E. Harrell,et al.  Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis , 2001 .

[17]  D. Shin,et al.  Adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): 5-year follow-up of an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[18]  S. Cai,et al.  ImmunoScore Signature: A Prognostic and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer , 2016, Annals of surgery.

[19]  E. Spitznagel,et al.  ASA Physical Status Classifications: A Study of Consistency of Ratings , 1978, Anesthesiology.

[20]  Liao Ning,et al.  Nomograms to Predict Pathologic Complete Response and Metastasis-Free Survival after Preoperative Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer , 2007 .

[21]  Hartwig Huland,et al.  A critical appraisal of logistic regression‐based nomograms, artificial neural networks, classification and regression‐tree models, look‐up tables and risk‐group stratification models for prostate cancer , 2007, BJU international.

[22]  Greg L Perkins,et al.  Serum tumor markers. , 2003, American family physician.

[23]  M. Fukushima,et al.  Development of a novel form of an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative (S-1) directed to the potentiation of the tumor selective cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil by two biochemical modulators. , 1996, Anti-cancer drugs.

[24]  Kay Washington,et al.  7th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: Stomach , 2010, Annals of surgical oncology.

[25]  J. Kim,et al.  External validation of nomogram for the prediction of recurrence after curative resection in early gastric cancer. , 2012, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[26]  N. Demartines,et al.  Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey , 2004, Annals of Surgery.

[27]  Y. Ohashi,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of adjuvant uracil–tegafur versus surgery alone for serosa‐negative, locally advanced gastric cancer , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[28]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics, 2012 , 2015, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[29]  J H Lawrie,et al.  The two histological types of gastric carcinoma in Northern Nigeria. , 1978, Gut.

[30]  Elena B. Elkin,et al.  Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[31]  T. Nishida Adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy , 2012, The Lancet.

[32]  M. Kattan Comparison of Cox regression with other methods for determining prediction models and nomograms. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[33]  Murray F. Brennan,et al.  Prognostic Nomogram for Patients Undergoing Resection for Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas , 2004, Annals of surgery.

[34]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  [Regression modeling strategies]. , 2011, Revista espanola de cardiologia.

[35]  S. Goodman,et al.  Beyond the Usual Prediction Accuracy Metrics: Reporting Results for Clinical Decision Making , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[36]  Richard K Valicenti,et al.  Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  Daniel F Hayes,et al.  ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[38]  R. Diasio,et al.  Clinical implications of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibition. , 1999, Oncology.