Impact of a free-falling wedge with water: synchronized visualization, pressure and acceleration measurements

A fixed 25deg deadrise angle wedge is allowed to fall from a range of heights into static water. A high-speed (up to 5000 frames s?1) camera is used to visualize the impact and subsequent formation of jet flows and droplets. Unsteady pressure measurements at six locations across the wedge surface are measured at 10 kHz. Two accelerometers (10g, 100g) are mounted above the apex of the wedge and measure the vertical acceleration. A purpose-built position gauge and analysis of the synchronized video allows the wedge motion to be captured. The synchronization of these data with the digital images of the impact makes it particularly suitable for the validation of computational fluid dynamics simulations as well as theoretical studies. A detailed experimental uncertainty analysis is presented. The repeatability of the test process is demonstrated and the measured pressures are comparable to previous studies. A 2.5 ms time delay is identified between the point of impact observed from the video and the onset of actual wedge deceleration. The clear definition of the free surface provides insight into jet formation, its evolution and eventual breakdown, further assisting with the development of numerical predictions

[1]  Ernest Edward. Zarnick,et al.  A nonlinear mathematical model of motions of a planing boat in regular waves , 1978 .

[2]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Artificial lateral line with biomimetic neuromasts to emulate fish sensing , 2010, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[3]  S. Billings,et al.  Orthogonal parameter estimation algorithm for non-linear stochastic systems , 1988 .

[4]  K. Mcalister,et al.  NACA 0015 Wing Pressure and Trailing Vortex Measurements , 1991 .

[5]  El-S. Hassan,et al.  Mathematical description of the stimuli to the lateral line system of fish derived from a three-dimensional flow field analysis , 1992, Biological Cybernetics.

[6]  Sheryl Coombs,et al.  Smart Skins: Information Processing by Lateral Line Flow Sensors , 2001, Auton. Robots.

[7]  D. Bodznick,et al.  An adaptive filter that cancels self-induced noise in the electrosensory and lateral line mechanosensory systems of fish , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[8]  Maarja Kruusmaa,et al.  Hydrodynamic pressure sensing with an artificial lateral line in steady and unsteady flows , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[9]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part II: gliding parallel to a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[10]  Vicente I Fernandez,et al.  Performance analysis for lateral-line-inspired sensor arrays , 2011 .

[11]  Sheng Chen,et al.  Representations of non-linear systems: the NARMAX model , 1989 .

[12]  James Lighthill,et al.  Estimates of pressure differences across the head of a swimming clupeid fish , 1993 .

[13]  Shane P. Windsor,et al.  The flow fields involved in hydrodynamic imaging by blind Mexican cave fish (Astyanax fasciatus). Part I: open water and heading towards a wall , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  O. Faltinsen,et al.  Water entry of two-dimensional bodies , 1993, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[15]  Otar Akanyeti Automatic code generation for autonomous mobile robots , 2009 .

[16]  S. Billings,et al.  Correlation based model validity tests for non-linear models , 1986 .

[17]  James Robert Whelan Wetdeck slamming of high-speed catamarans with a centre bow , 2004 .

[18]  G. Cavagna,et al.  Pressure distribution on the body surface of swimming fish. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[19]  H. Bleckmann Reception of hydrodynamic stimuli in aquatic and semiaquatic animals , 1994 .

[20]  Stephen R. Turnock,et al.  Improvement to body impact predictions using CFD through analysis of an unsteady boundary layer. , 2008 .

[21]  Armin W. Troesch,et al.  Asymmetric Hydrodynamic Impact and Dynamic Response of Vessels , 1999 .

[22]  Alain Desrochers,et al.  Experimental study on the water impact of a symmetrical wedge , 2006 .

[23]  Noah J Cowan,et al.  The Critical Role of Locomotion Mechanics in Decoding Sensory Systems , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  David Bodznick,et al.  SUPPRESSION OF COMMON MODE SIGNALS WITHIN THE ELECTROSENSORY SYSTEM OF THE LITTLE SKATE , 1992 .

[25]  G. X. Wu,et al.  Numerical simulation and experimental study of water entry of a wedge in free fall motion , 2004 .

[26]  J. Montgomery,et al.  The lateral line can mediate rheotaxis in fish , 1997, Nature.

[27]  H. Wagner Über Stoß- und Gleitvorgänge an der Oberfläche von Flüssigkeiten , 1932 .

[28]  Matthew J McHenry,et al.  Are fish less responsive to a flow stimulus when swimming? , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  Daniel Coca,et al.  Non-linear system identification using wavelet multiresolution models , 2001 .

[30]  Fulvio Scarano,et al.  Surface pressure and aerodynamic loads determination of a transonic airfoil based on particle image velocimetry , 2009 .

[31]  Yoichi Sumi,et al.  On the water impact and elastic response of a flat plate at small impact angles , 2000 .

[32]  Armin W. Troesch,et al.  Initial water impact of a wedge at vertical and oblique angles , 2004 .

[33]  Peter Stansby,et al.  THE SLAM FORCE ON A FLAT PLATE IN FREE FLIGHT DUE TO IMPACT ON A WAVE CREST , 1998 .

[34]  Gabriel Weymouth,et al.  Hydrodynamic object recognition using pressure sensing , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[35]  H. Bleckmann,et al.  Determination of object position, vortex shedding frequency and flow velocity using artificial lateral line canals , 2011, Beilstein journal of nanotechnology.