Improved participants’ understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials

[1]  Vichai Chokevivat,et al.  SIDCER informed consent form: principles and a developmental guideline. , 2016, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[2]  N. Koonrungsesomboon,et al.  Improved participants’ understanding in a healthy volunteer study using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled study , 2015, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.

[3]  Halah Ibrahim,et al.  GCP compliance and readability of informed consent forms from an emerging hub for clinical trials , 2015, Perspectives in clinical research.

[4]  Terri Voepel-Lewis,et al.  Digital multimedia: a new approach for informed consent? , 2015, JAMA.

[5]  N. Kass,et al.  A pilot study of simple interventions to improve informed consent in clinical research: Feasibility, approach, and results , 2015, Clinical trials.

[6]  N. Koonrungsesomboon,et al.  Understanding of Essential Elements Required in Informed Consent Form among Researchers and Institutional Review Board Members , 2015, Tropical medicine and health.

[7]  Nguyen Phuoc Long,et al.  Participants’ understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2015, Bulletin of the World Health Organization.

[8]  S. Kundapura,et al.  The big Cs of the informed consent form: compliance and comprehension. , 2013, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[9]  Adam A. Nishimura,et al.  Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: a systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials , 2013, BMC medical ethics.

[10]  N. Narisetty,et al.  Informing the uninformed: optimizing the consent message using a fractional factorial design. , 2013, JAMA pediatrics.

[11]  M. Reni,et al.  Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension , 2013, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[12]  Colleen Lewis,et al.  Therapeutic misconception, misestimation, and optimism in participants enrolled in phase 1 trials , 2012, Cancer.

[13]  R. Semelka,et al.  Low quality and lack of clarity of current informed consent forms in cardiology: how to improve them. , 2012, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[14]  C. Grady,et al.  The quality of informed consent: mapping the landscape. A review of empirical data from developing and developed countries , 2012, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[15]  Angela Fagerlin,et al.  Presenting Research Risks and Benefits to Parents: Does Format Matter? , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  T. Laitinen,et al.  Is informed consent related to success in exercise and diet intervention as evaluated at 12 months? DR's EXTRA study , 2010, BMC medical ethics.

[17]  Y. Brandberg,et al.  Knowledge and understanding among cancer patients consenting to participate in clinical trials. , 2008, European journal of cancer.

[18]  Z Hill,et al.  Informed consent in Ghana: what do participants really understand? , 2007, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[19]  Elaine Larson,et al.  Improving participant comprehension in the informed consent process. , 2007, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[20]  M. Jefford,et al.  Longer consent forms for clinical trials compromise patient understanding: so why are they lengthening? , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  K. Marsh,et al.  Understanding of informed consent in a low-income setting: three case studies from the Kenyan Coast. , 2004, Social science & medicine.

[22]  James Flory,et al.  Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review. , 2004, JAMA.

[23]  Michael K Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  Wolzt,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2003, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[25]  Jenny L Donovan,et al.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial , 1998, BMJ.

[26]  A. Kaye,et al.  Consent , 1994, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Kaasa,et al.  The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[28]  G. Lindegger,et al.  Informed consent in an antiretroviral trial in Nigeria. , 2007, Indian journal of medical ethics.

[29]  Christiane,et al.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. , 2004, Journal international de bioethique = International journal of bioethics.

[30]  L. Roberts,et al.  Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions. , 2003, IRB.

[31]  Jonas Ecker,et al.  r a c t i c e , 2010 .