Filtered-backprojection reconstruction for a cone-beam computed tomography scanner with independent source and detector rotations.

PURPOSE A new cone-beam CT scanner for image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can independently rotate the source and the detector along circular trajectories. Existing reconstruction algorithms are not suitable for this scanning geometry. The authors propose and evaluate a three-dimensional (3D) filtered-backprojection reconstruction for this situation. METHODS The source and the detector trajectories are tuned to image a field-of-view (FOV) that is offset with respect to the center-of-rotation. The new reconstruction formula is derived from the Feldkamp algorithm and results in a similar three-step algorithm: projection weighting, ramp filtering, and weighted backprojection. Simulations of a Shepp Logan digital phantom were used to evaluate the new algorithm with a 10 cm-offset FOV. A real cone-beam CT image with an 8.5 cm-offset FOV was also obtained from projections of an anthropomorphic head phantom. RESULTS The quality of the cone-beam CT images reconstructed using the new algorithm was similar to those using the Feldkamp algorithm which is used in conventional cone-beam CT. The real image of the head phantom exhibited comparable image quality to that of existing systems. CONCLUSIONS The authors have proposed a 3D filtered-backprojection reconstruction for scanners with independent source and detector rotations that is practical and effective. This algorithm forms the basis for exploiting the scanner's unique capabilities in IGRT protocols.

[1]  K. Bae,et al.  Efficient correction for CT image artifacts caused by objects extending outside the scan field of view. , 2000, Medical physics.

[2]  Frederic Noo,et al.  A local shift-variant Fourier model and experimental validation of circular cone-beam computed tomography artifacts. , 2009, Medical physics.

[3]  Simon Rit,et al.  The Reconstruction Toolkit (RTK), an open-source cone-beam CT reconstruction toolkit based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK) , 2014 .

[4]  Dirk Verellen,et al.  Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[5]  Rolf Clackdoyle,et al.  Tomographic Reconstruction in the 21st Century , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[6]  P S Cho,et al.  Cone-beam CT from width-truncated projections. , 1996, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[7]  Pierre Grangeat,et al.  Cone-beam spelt with a tilted detector , 1993 .

[8]  Michael B Sharpe,et al.  Image-guided radiotherapy: rationale, benefits, and limitations. , 2006, The Lancet. Oncology.

[9]  H. Tuy AN INVERSION FORMULA FOR CONE-BEAM RECONSTRUCTION* , 1983 .

[10]  P Grangeat,et al.  Cone-beam SPECT with a tilted detector. , 1993, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[11]  D. Verellen,et al.  Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy , 2007, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[12]  Philippe Rizo,et al.  Comparison of two three-dimensional x-ray cone-beam-reconstruction algorithms with circular source trajectories , 1991 .

[13]  G T Gullberg,et al.  Reconstruction for fan beam with an angular-dependent displaced center-of-rotation. , 1988, Medical physics.

[14]  M. Defrise,et al.  Cone-beam filtered-backprojection algorithm for truncated helical data. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  J. Wong,et al.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  Carl R. Crawford,et al.  Reconstruction Algorithm for Fan Beam with a Displaced Center-of-Rotation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  M van Herk,et al.  Two-dimensional exit dosimetry using a liquid-filled electronic portal imaging device and a convolution model. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[18]  L. Feldkamp,et al.  Practical cone-beam algorithm , 1984 .