Noninducibility and Late Potential Abolition: A Novel Combined Prognostic Procedural End Point for Catheter Ablation of Postinfarction Ventricular Tachycardia

Background—Successful late potential (LP) abolition and postprocedural ventricular tachycardia (VT) noninducibility constitute significant end points after catheter ablation for VT. We investigated the prognostic impact of a combined procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition in a large series of post–myocardial infarction patients with VT. Methods and Results—A total of 160 (154 men, 94% with implantable cardioverter defibrillators) consecutive post–myocardial infarction patients undergoing first-time ablation procedures from 2010 to 2012 were included. Of the 159 patients surviving the procedure, 137 (86%) were either inducible or in VT at baseline and 103 (65%) had baseline LP presence, of which 79 (77%) underwent successful LP abolition. The combined end point was assessable in 155 (97%) patients. There were 50 (32%) patients with VT recurrences and 17 (11%) cardiac deaths during follow-up. Patients who fulfilled the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition compared with inducible patients exhibited a significantly lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 47.4%; log-rank P<0.001) and cardiac death (4.1% versus 42.1%; log-rank P<0.001). Among noninducible patients, those with additional LP abolition also had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (16.4% versus 46.0%; log-rank P<0.001). After multivariate analysis, the combined end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition (hazard ratio, 0.205, P<0.001) was independently associated with VT recurrence and cardiac death (hazard ratio, 0.106; P=0.001). Conclusions—Achieving a combined catheter ablation procedural end point of VT noninducibility and LP abolition reduces VT recurrence rates to low levels (16%). The overall strategy was associated with a significant impact on cardiac survival.

[1]  Mercedes Ortiz,et al.  Ablation of electrograms with an isolated, delayed component as treatment of unmappable monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  C. Brombin,et al.  Contact Force Monitoring for Cardiac Mapping in Patients with Ventricular Tachycardia , 2013, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[3]  Jeremy N Ruskin,et al.  Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  P. Brugada,et al.  Significance of ventricular arrhythmias initiated by programmed ventricular stimulation: the importance of the type of ventricular arrhythmia induced and the number of premature stimuli required. , 1984, Circulation.

[5]  W. Stevenson,et al.  Catheter Ablation in Patients With Multiple and Unstable Ventricular Tachycardias After Myocardial Infarction: Short Ablation Lines Guided by Reentry Circuit Isthmuses and Sinus Rhythm Mapping , 2001, Circulation.

[6]  H. Calkins,et al.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy: results of a prospective multicenter study. Cooled RF Multi Center Investigators Group. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Warren M. Jackman,et al.  Irrigated Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Guided by Electroanatomic Mapping for Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Myocardial Infarction: The Multicenter Thermocool Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Trial , 2008, Circulation.

[8]  K. P. Anderson,et al.  Sudden Cardiac Death Unresponsive to Implantable Defibrillator Therapy: An Urgent Target for Clinicians, Industry and Government , 2005, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[9]  Giuseppe Maccabelli,et al.  Late Potentials Abolition as an Additional Technique for Reduction of Arrhythmia Recurrence in Scar Related Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation , 2012, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[10]  Stephan Willems,et al.  Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial , 2010, The Lancet.

[11]  M. Cooper,et al.  Effect of repetition of extrastimuli on sensitivity and reproducibility of mode of induction of ventricular tachycardia by programmed stimulation. , 1988, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  D. Mark,et al.  Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Frank Bogun,et al.  Isolated potentials during sinus rhythm and pace-mapping within scars as guides for ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  A. Moss,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  H. Calkins,et al.  Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy: results of a prospective multicenter study. Cooled RF Multi Center Investigators Group. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  A. Moss,et al.  Long-Term Benefit of Primary Prevention With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: An Extended 8-Year Follow-Up Study of the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial II , 2010, Circulation.

[17]  O. Alfieri,et al.  Management of Ventricular Tachycardia in the Setting of a Dedicated Unit for the Treatment of Complex Ventricular Arrhythmias: Long-Term Outcome After Ablation , 2013, Circulation.

[18]  G. Hindricks,et al.  Catheter Ablation of Recurrent Scar‐Related Ventricular Tachycardia Using Electroanatomical Mapping and Irrigated Ablation Technology: Results of the Prospective Multicenter Euro‐VT‐Study , 2010, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[19]  N Engl,et al.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. , 1997, Circulation.

[20]  A. Natale,et al.  Gender differences in clinical outcome and primary prevention defibrillator benefit in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2010, Heart rhythm.

[21]  F. Marchlinski,et al.  Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. , 2000, Circulation.

[22]  A. Moss,et al.  Predictive value of ventricular arrhythmia inducibility for subsequent ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT) II patients. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Hubert Cochet,et al.  Elimination of Local Abnormal Ventricular Activities: A New End Point for Substrate Modification in Patients With Scar-Related Ventricular Tachycardia , 2012, Circulation.