Data-worth analysis for multiobjective optimal design of pump-and-treat remediation systems

The design and the management of pump-and-treat (PAT) remediation systems for contaminated aquifers under uncertain hydrogeological settings and parameters often involve decisions that trade off cost optimality against reliability. Both design objectives can be improved by planning site characterization programs that reduce subsurface parameter uncertainty. However, the cost for subsurface investigation often weighs heavily upon the budget of the remedial action and must thus be taken into account in the trade-off analysis. In this paper, we develop a stochastic data-worth framework with the purpose of estimating the economic opportunity of subsurface investigation programs. Since the spatial distribution of hydraulic conductivity is most often the major source of uncertainty, we focus on the direct sampling of hydraulic conductivity at prescribed locations of the aquifer. The data worth of hydraulic conductivity measurements is estimated from the reduction of the overall management cost ensuing from the reduction in parameter uncertainty obtained from sampling. The overall cost is estimated as the expected value of the cost of installing and operating the PAT system plus penalties incurred due to violations of cleanup goals and constraints. The crucial point of the data-worth framework is represented by the so-called pre-posterior analysis. Here, the tradeoff between decreasing overall costs and increasing site-investigation budgets is assessed to determine a management strategy proposed on the basis of the information available at the start of remediation. The goal of the pre-posterior analysis is to indicate whether the proposed management strategy should be implemented as is, or re-designed on the basis of additional data collected with a particular site-investigation program. The study indicates that the value of information is ultimately related to the estimates of cleanup target violations and decision makers’ degree of risk-aversion. � 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

[1]  David E. Goldberg,et al.  A niched Pareto genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization , 1994, Proceedings of the First IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation. IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence.

[2]  Richard C. Peralta,et al.  Optimal design of aquifer cleanup systems under uncertainty using a neural network and a genetic algorithm , 1999 .

[3]  G. Marsily.  Quantitative Hydrogeology: Groundwater Hydrology for Engineers , 1986 .

[4]  Jeffrey Horn,et al.  Multi-objective optimal design of groundwater remediation systems: application of the niched Pareto genetic algorithm (NPGA) , 2002 .

[5]  L. L. Rogers,et al.  Optimization of groundwater remediation using artificial neural networks with parallel solute transport modeling , 1994 .

[6]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Comparison of Gaussian Conditional Mean and Kriging Estimation in the Geostatistical Solution of the Inverse Problem , 1985 .

[7]  J. Philip,et al.  Theory of Infiltration , 1969 .

[8]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1993 .

[9]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Convergence of Stochastic Optimization and Decision Analysis in the Engineering Design of Aquifer Remediation , 1999 .

[10]  Domenico Baù,et al.  Geostatistical solution to the inverse problem using surrogate functions for remediation of shallow aquifers , 2006 .

[11]  Richard C. Peralta,et al.  Optimizing separate phase light hydrocarbon recovery from contaminated unconfined aquifers , 1998 .

[12]  G. Dagan.  Stochastic Modeling of Groundwater Flow by Unconditional and Conditional Probabilities: The Inverse Problem , 1985 .

[13]  S. Kesler,et al.  Pre-posterior analysis as a tool for data evaluation: Application to aquifer contamination , 1988 .

[14]  S. Gorelick,et al.  When enough is enough: The worth of monitoring data in aquifer remediation design , 1994 .

[15]  Robert J. Vanderbei,et al.  Robust Optimization of Large-Scale Systems , 1995, Oper. Res..

[16]  E. G. Vomvoris,et al.  A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one‐dimensional simulations , 1983 .

[17]  Cass T. Miller,et al.  Optimal design for problems involving flow and transport phenomena in saturated subsurface systems , 2002 .

[18]  Mario Putti,et al.  A comparison of Picard and Newton iteration in the numerical solution of multidimensional variably saturated flow problems , 1994 .

[19]  Chester C. Kisiel,et al.  Worth of additional data to a digital computer model of a groundwater basin , 1974 .

[20]  Hamid R. Nemati,et al.  Groundwater quality management under uncertainty: stochastic programming approaches and the value of information , 1992 .

[21]  S. Gorelick,et al.  Optimal groundwater quality management under parameter uncertainty , 1987 .

[22]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 4. The Concept of Data Worth and Its Use in the Development of Site Investigation Strategies , 1992 .

[23]  S. Ranji Ranjithan,et al.  GENETIC ALGORITHM APPROACHES FOR ADDRESSING UNMODELED OBJECTIVES IN OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS , 2001 .

[24]  A. J. Booker,et al.  A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates , 1998 .

[25]  Barbara S. Minsker,et al.  Optimal groundwater remediation design using an Adaptive Neural Network Genetic Algorithm , 2006 .

[26]  J. Bear.  Hydraulics of Groundwater , 1979 .

[27]  Lucien Duckstein,et al.  Bayesian decision theory applied to design in hydrology , 1972 .

[28]  J. Evans,et al.  Assessing the value of hydrogeologic information for risk‐based remedial action decisions , 1989 .

[29]  Thomas Maddock,et al.  Management model as a tool for studying the worth of data , 1973 .

[30]  Brian J. Wagner,et al.  Evaluating data worth for ground-water management under uncertainty , 1999 .

[31]  Domenico Baù,et al.  Stochastic management of pump-and-treat strategies using surrogate functions , 2006 .

[32]  G. Pinder,et al.  Optimal data acquisition strategy for the development of a transport model for groundwater remediation , 1991 .

[33]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .

[34]  David W. Watkins,et al.  Finding Robust Solutions to Water Resources Problems , 1997 .

[35]  Joel Massmann,et al.  Hydrogeological Decision Analysis: 1. A Framework , 1990 .

[36]  A.F.B. Tompson,et al.  Numerical simulation of solute transport in randomly heterogeneous porous media: Motivation, model development, and application , 1987 .