A brace-type seismic damper based on yielding the walls of hollow structural sections

Abstract This paper proposes a new brace-type seismic damper designed for earthquake protection of structures. It consists of a tube-in-tube assemblage of two commonly available hollow structural sections. The outer hollow section of the Tube-in-Tube Damper (TTD) has a series of strips created by cutting a series of slits though the wall, and it is welded to the inner hollow section in such a way that when the brace damper is subjected to forced displacements in the direction of its axis, the strips dissipate energy through flexural/shear yielding. In comparison with other existing brace-type dampers such as the popular buckling restrained brace, the TTD has the advantages of being much simpler–thus entailing a lower cost–and the yielding part of the damper can be easily inspected after an earthquake. The performance of the proposed damper was assessed experimentally by an initial series of four cyclic tests, and compared with that of conventional steel plates with slits in another series of five tests. The experimental results show that the damper possesses very stable hysteric characteristics and excellent energy dissipation capacity, both similar to the conventional steel plates with slits already in use for seismic applications. Based on the test results, a hysteric model and a procedure for predicting the ultimate energy dissipation capacity and failure of the new damper are proposed.

[1]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic testing and performance of buckling- restrained bracing systems , 2006 .

[2]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  ENERGY DISSIPATION BEHAVIOUR OF SHEAR PANELS MADE OF LOW YIELD STEEL , 1994 .

[3]  S. Manson Behavior of materials under conditions of thermal stress , 1953 .

[4]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Passive damping technology for buildings in Japan , 2000 .

[5]  Keh‐Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Design of Steel Triangular Plate Energy Absorbers for Seismic-Resistant Construction , 1993 .

[6]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Strain-Hardening Behavior of Shear Panels Made of Low-Yield Steel. I: Test , 1995 .

[7]  E. W. C. Wilkins,et al.  Cumulative damage in fatigue , 1956 .

[8]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Performance evaluation of buckling-restrained braces in damage-controlled structures , 2002 .

[9]  Juan Carlos de la Llera,et al.  Earthquake behavior of structures with copper energy dissipators , 2004 .

[10]  Hassan Sedarat,et al.  Seismic Upgrade in San Francisco Using Energy Dissipation Devices , 1993 .

[11]  Robert D. Hanson,et al.  Influence of ADAS Element Parameters on Building Seismic Response , 1992 .

[12]  Andrew S. Whittaker,et al.  Energy dissipation systems for seismic applications: Current practice and recent developments , 2008 .

[13]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Buckling‐restrained brace using steel mortar planks; performance evaluation as a hysteretic damper , 2006 .

[14]  Sang-Hoon Oh,et al.  Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers , 2009 .

[15]  Enrique Martinez‐Romero,et al.  Experiences on the Use of Supplementary Energy Dissipators on Building Structures , 1993 .

[16]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces , 2003 .

[17]  Faris Albermani,et al.  Experimental study of steel slit damper for passive energy dissipation , 2008 .

[18]  Amadeo Benavent-Climent,et al.  An energy‐based damage model for seismic response of steel structures , 2007 .

[19]  A. Ang,et al.  Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete , 1985 .