Aftershock asymmetry/rupture directivity among central San Andreas fault microearthquakes

Using a waveform cross-correlation technique, we have obtained precise relative locations for nearly 75% of the Northern California Seismic Network catalog (4300 earthquakes) occurring between 1984 and 1997 along 50 km of the San Andreas fault. Errors in relative location are meters to tens of meters for events separated by tens to hundreds of meters. We find that consecutive earthquakes in the relocated catalog occur no closer than a distance approximately equal to the radius of the first rupture, as estimated from the moment-magnitude relationship of Abercrombie [1996] assuming a 10-MPa stress drop. When the relative position vectors between consecutive events are normalized by this distance and projected onto the fault surface, they define a hole whose shape suggests that typical microearthquakes are elongate in the mode II (slip-parallel) direction by several tens of percent. Moreover, of the 100 immediate aftershocks occurring closest to the mode II edges of the prior rupture, more than twice as many occur to the northwest than to the southeast. We interpret this asymmetry as resulting from the large contrast in material properties across the fault. Models of dynamic rupture between dissimilar media predict that ruptures in this region may run preferentially to the southeast, in the direction of motion of the lower-velocity material. If so, then the barriers that stop rupture fronts moving to the southeast should initially be farther from failure, on average, than the barriers that stop rupture fronts moving to the northwest. Once the rupture stops, the induced stress change is more symmetric but the fault remains farther from failure (on average) to the southeast. This interpretation receives some support from pulse width measurements on a localized set of 72 magnitude 0.6 to 3.6 earthquakes.

[1]  K. Aki,et al.  Seismic Trapped Modes in the Oroville and San Andreas Fault Zones , 1990, Science.

[2]  F. Waldhauser,et al.  Slip‐parallel seismic lineations on the Northern Hayward Fault, California , 1999 .

[3]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Theoretical Basis of Some Empirical Relations in Seismology by Hiroo Kanamori And , 1975 .

[4]  John C. VanDecar,et al.  Determination of teleseismic relative phase arrival times using multi-channel cross-correlation and least squares , 1990 .

[5]  C. Marone LABORATORY-DERIVED FRICTION LAWS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SEISMIC FAULTING , 1998 .

[6]  Alan T. Linde,et al.  A slow earthquake sequence on the San Andreas fault , 1996, Nature.

[7]  N. Deichmann Empirical Green's functions: A comparison between pulse width measurements and deconvolution by spectral division , 1999 .

[8]  J. Rice,et al.  Dilatancy, compaction, and slip instability of a fluid‐infiltrated fault , 1995 .

[9]  J. Weertman,et al.  Unstable slippage across a fault that separates elastic media of different elastic constants , 1980 .

[10]  Alberto Michelini,et al.  Seismological studies at Parkfield. I. Simultaneous inversion for velocity structure and hypocenters using cubic B-splines parameterization , 1991, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[11]  Fred W. Klein,et al.  Deep fault plane geometry inferred from multiplet relative relocation beneath the south flank of Kilauea , 1994 .

[12]  Wayne Thatcher,et al.  Resolution of fault slip along the 470‐km‐long rupture of the great 1906 San Francisco earthquake and its implications , 1997 .

[13]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Determination of rupture duration and stress drop for earthquakes in southern California , 1983 .

[14]  Steven M. Day,et al.  Effects of a low-velocity zone on a dynamic rupture , 1997, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[15]  Robert M. Nadeau,et al.  Seismological studies at Parkfield VI: Moment release rates and estimates of source parameters for small repeating earthquakes , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[16]  Rachel E. Abercrombie,et al.  Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5‐km depth , 1995 .

[17]  Allan M. Rubin,et al.  Highly concentrated seismicity caused by deformation of Kilauea's deep magma system , 1996, Nature.

[18]  D. J. Andrews,et al.  Properties and implications of dynamic rupture along a material interface , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[19]  H. Kanamori,et al.  A moment magnitude scale , 1979 .

[20]  W Foxall,et al.  Clustering and Periodic Recurrence of Microearthquakes on the San Andreas Fault at Parkfield, California , 1995, Science.

[21]  Chi‐yuen Wang,et al.  Gravity anomaly and density structure of the San Andreas fault zone , 1986 .

[22]  R. Abercrombie The magnitude-frequency distribution of earthquakes recorded with deep seismometers at Cajon Pass , 1996 .

[23]  G. Beroza,et al.  Source array analysis of coda waves near the 1989 Loma Prieta, California, mainshock: Implications for the mechanism of coseismic velocity changes , 1997 .

[24]  B. E. Shaw,et al.  Postseismic response of repeating aftershocks , 1998 .

[25]  Frederick M. Chester,et al.  Implications for mechanical properties of brittle faults from observations of the Punchbowl fault zone, California , 1986 .

[26]  J. E. Vidale,et al.  Variations in rupture process with recurrence interval in a repeated small earthquake , 1994, Nature.

[27]  M. Zoback,et al.  Mechanism Diversity of the Loma Prieta Aftershocks and the Mechanics of Mainshock-Aftershock Interaction , 1993, Science.

[28]  William L. Ellsworth,et al.  Monitoring velocity variations in the crust using earthquake doublets: An application to the Calaveras Fault, California , 1984 .

[29]  W. Ellsworth,et al.  Two‐dimensional seismic image of the San Andreas Fault in the Northern Gabilan Range, central California: Evidence for fluids in the fault zone , 1997 .

[30]  M. Gladwin,et al.  Measurements of the strain field associated with episodic creep events on the San Andreas Fault at San Juan Bautista, California , 1994 .

[31]  A. Michael,et al.  Seismotectonics of the Loma Prieta, California, region determined from three-dimensional V p , V p / V s , and seismicity , 1998 .

[32]  A. Rubin,et al.  Streaks of microearthquakes along creeping faults , 1999, Nature.

[33]  Yehuda Ben-Zion,et al.  Wrinkle-like slip pulse on a fault between different , 1997 .

[34]  G. Abers,et al.  Source scaling of earthquakes in the shumagin region, Alaska: time-domain inversions of regional waveforms , 1995 .

[35]  R. Madariaga,et al.  Modeling dynamic rupture in a 3D earthquake fault model , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.