Selecting a Database for Drug Literature Retrieval: A Comparison of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science

Three widely used databases—MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science—were compared for their relative ability to retrieve the largest number of articles within the drug literature, using three search terms: two for specific drugs (atorvastatin and olanzapine) and one for a major class of drugs (statins). These drugs and the class of drugs were chosen for their longevity and continued high clinical and scientific interest, as indicated by the many articles concerning them published in scholarly and professional journals over the last two decades. Significant differences were observed in the journal coverage and the number of documents each database retrieved, with Scopus significantly outperforming the other two databases in these respects. Based on the results from this limited but by no means atypical study of comparative strengths and degree of coverage, the best option for retrieving the largest numbers of articles on a particular drug in the literature would be to use both Scopus and Web of Science, as these two databases complement each other with respect to the journal coverage. MEDLINE retrieved much smaller numbers of documents in all searches and should be used only when the other two databases are not available.

[1]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  Lipid-lowering effects of statins: a comparative review , 2006, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.

[2]  Mary Shultz,et al.  Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[3]  S. Fingerman,et al.  Web of Science and Scopus: Current features and Capabilities. , 2006, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.

[4]  Sharon A. Weiner Tale of two databases: The history of federally funded information systems for education and medicine , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  P. Jacsó As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .

[6]  Margaret Haldeman,et al.  Exploration tools for drug discovery and beyond: applying SciFinder to interdisciplinary research. , 2005, Current drug discovery technologies.

[7]  M. Dorgan,et al.  Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.

[8]  C. Beasley,et al.  Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. , 1999, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[9]  Dennis F. Thompson,et al.  Tracking the Growth of Drug Therapy Literature Using PubMed , 2007 .

[10]  Matthew E Falagas,et al.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[11]  Michael E. Anders,et al.  Comparison of , 2010 .

[12]  Lars Iselid,et al.  Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[13]  Aditi Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Examining Biological Abstracts on Two Platforms: What Do End Users Need to Know? , 2010 .