Selecting a Database for Drug Literature Retrieval: A Comparison of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jennifer G. Robinson,et al. Lipid-lowering effects of statins: a comparative review , 2006, Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy.
[2] Mary Shultz,et al. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. , 2007, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.
[3] S. Fingerman,et al. Web of Science and Scopus: Current features and Capabilities. , 2006, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship.
[4] Sharon A. Weiner. Tale of two databases: The history of federally funded information systems for education and medicine , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..
[5] P. Jacsó. As we may search : Comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation-based and citation-enhanced databases , 2005 .
[6] Margaret Haldeman,et al. Exploration tools for drug discovery and beyond: applying SciFinder to interdisciplinary research. , 2005, Current drug discovery technologies.
[7] M. Dorgan,et al. Identifying clinical trials in the medical literature with electronic databases: MEDLINE alone is not enough. , 2000, Controlled clinical trials.
[8] C. Beasley,et al. Olanzapine. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. , 1999, Clinical pharmacokinetics.
[9] Dennis F. Thompson,et al. Tracking the Growth of Drug Therapy Literature Using PubMed , 2007 .
[10] Matthew E Falagas,et al. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
[11] Michael E. Anders,et al. Comparison of , 2010 .
[12] Lars Iselid,et al. Web of Science and Scopus: a journal title overlap study , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..
[13] Aditi Bandyopadhyay,et al. Examining Biological Abstracts on Two Platforms: What Do End Users Need to Know? , 2010 .