Development and maintenance of connectivity in the visual system of the frog. I. The effects of eye rotation and visual deprivation.

[1]  H. Hirsch,et al.  Development and maintenance of connectivity in the visual system of the frog. II. The effects of eye removal. , 1973, Brain research.

[2]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  The retinotectal projections after uncrossing the optic chiasma in Xenopus with one compound eye. , 1971, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[3]  M. Jacobson.  Absence of adaptive modification in developing retinotectal connections in frogs after visual deprivation or disparate stimulation of the eyes. , 1971, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Receptive field properties of single units from the visual projection to the ipsilateral tectum in the frog. , 1970, Quarterly journal of experimental physiology and cognate medical sciences.

[5]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Binocular interaction in the formation of specific intertectal neuronal connexions , 1970, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Hubel,et al.  The period of susceptibility to the physiological effects of unilateral eye closure in kittens , 1970, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Development of neuronal connections with skin grafts in frogs: Behavioral and electrophysiological studies , 1969, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  K. Fite,et al.  Single-unit analysis of binocular neurons in the frog optic tectum. , 1969, Experimental neurology.

[9]  M. Jacobson.  Development of neuronal specificity in retinal ganglion cells of Xenopus. , 1968, Developmental biology.

[10]  Gaze Rm,et al.  Visual responses from ipsilateral tectal units in the frog. , 1967 .

[11]  M. Jacobson,et al.  Retinal Ganglion Cells: Specification of Central Connections in Larval Xenopus laevis , 1967, Science.

[12]  D. Hubel,et al.  Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[13]  M. Jacobson,et al.  THE PROJECTION OF THE BINOCULAR VISUAL FIELD ON THE OPTIC TECTA OF THE FROG , 1962 .

[14]  A. C. Taylor,et al.  Stages in the normal development of Rana pipiens larvae , 1946, The Anatomical record.

[15]  L. Stone.  Functional Polarization in Retinal Development and Its Reestablishment in Regenerating Retinæ of Rotated Grafted Eyes.∗ , 1944 .

[16]  W. Shumway.  Stages in the normal development of Rana pipiens I. External form , 1940 .

[17]  R. M. Gaze,et al.  Rigidity and plasticity in the amphibian visual system. , 1970, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[18]  M. Jacobson.  Starting Points for Research in the Ontogeny of Behavior , 1966 .

[19]  R. Sperry.  Regulative factors in the orderly growth of neural circuits. , 1951, Growth.

[20]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  RESTORATION OF VISION AFTER CROSSING OF OPTIC NERVES AND AFTER CONTRALATERAL TRANSPLANTATION OF EYE , 1945 .

[21]  Roger W. Sperry,et al.  OPTIC NERVE REGENERATION WITH RETURN OF VISION IN ANURANS , 1944 .