A digital approach to robust and esthetic implant overdenture construction.

OBJECTIVE Overdenture therapy is an important option for implant rehabilitation. However, numerous reports suggest that mechanical/technical complications and failures can limit therapeutic success. The goal of this report is to illustrate a digital approach to design and construction of a robust overdenture with high-esthetic value. MATERIALS AND METHODS Beginning with new denture design to establish esthetic parameters, 3D modeling of a metal framework and the denture teeth are completed in a connected manner. This enables connection of rapidly printed, prototype dentition that is attached directly to the framework without intervening wax or acrylic components. Following evaluation of the dentition and required adjustments, the final dentition is milled from resin and processed to the selective laser sintered framework. RESULTS The advantages of the digital workflow include the control of dimensions and strength of the framework, the esthetic relationship of the framework to the dentition and the facilitation of esthetic try-in of the dentition. CONCLUSION Enhancing a robust overdenture can be readily achieved using a digital workflow. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE The use of digital technology enables the clinical team to plan and produce prostheses with dimensions and contours that support long-term function and esthetics. The clinical chair time can be potentially reduced by use of digital design that facilitates try-in and reduces major errors by improved communication between the patient, dentist, and technician.

[1]  Zhen Yang,et al.  Digital Duplication and 3D Printing for Implant Overdenture Fabrication. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[2]  L. Cooper,et al.  Retrospective cohort analysis of maxillary overdentures retained by unsplinted implants. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[3]  Hong Li,et al.  Adaptation of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by selective laser melting. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  F. Mangano,et al.  Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures , 2019, Scanning.

[5]  A. Vissink,et al.  Four or six implants in the maxillary posterior region to support an overdenture: 5‐year results from a randomized controlled trial , 2019, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  Mathew T Kattadiyil,et al.  An In Vitro Investigation of Accuracy and Fit of Conventional and CAD/CAM Removable Partial Denture Frameworks. , 2018, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[7]  K. Uoshima,et al.  Risk factors associated with post-loading implant loss of removable and fixed implant-supported prostheses in edentulous jaws. , 2018, Journal of prosthodontic research.

[8]  Jian Yang,et al.  Preliminary Clinical Application of Removable Partial Denture Frameworks Fabricated Using Computer-Aided Design and Rapid Prototyping Techniques. , 2017, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[9]  Yuan Lv,et al.  Design and fabrication of complete dentures using CAD/CAM technology , 2017, Medicine.

[10]  Brian J Goodacre,et al.  Fixed vs removable complete arch implant prostheses: A literature review of prosthodontic outcomes. , 2017, European journal of oral implantology.

[11]  Qing Li,et al.  The Relationship of Mandibular Morphology with Residual Ridge Resorption Associated with Implant-Retained Overdentures. , 2016, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[12]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  L. Cooper,et al.  A Digital Approach to Improved Overdentures for the Adolescent Oligodontia Patient. , 2016, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[14]  N. Heussen,et al.  A systematic review and meta‐analysis of removable and fixed implant‐supported prostheses in edentulous jaws: post‐loading implant loss , 2015, Clinical oral implants research.

[15]  A. Vissink,et al.  Maxillary overdentures supported by four or six implants in the anterior region: 5‐year results from a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[16]  L. Cooper,et al.  Maxillary Complete Denture Outcomes: A Systematic Review of Patient-Based Outcomes. , 2016, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  N. Zitzmann,et al.  Protocols for the Maxillary Implant Overdenture: A Systematic Review. , 2016, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[18]  Wei-Shao Lin,et al.  Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis. , 2015, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  G. Heydecke,et al.  What is the optimal number of implants for fixed reconstructions: a systematic review. , 2012, Clinical oral implants research.

[20]  German O Gallucci,et al.  A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients. , 2012, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[21]  G. Chaushu,et al.  Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. , 2011, Clinical oral implants research.

[22]  D. Felton Edentulism and comorbid factors. , 2009, Texas dental journal.

[23]  C. Goodacre,et al.  Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  T D Taylor,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Montreal, Quebec, May 24-25, 2002. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[25]  T D Taylor,et al.  The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular two-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. , 2002, Gerodontology.

[26]  G. Carlsson,et al.  Clinical morbidity and sequelae of treatment with complete dentures. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.