Subjective probability without monotonicity: or how Machina's mom may also be probabilistically sophisticated
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Simon Grant,et al. Many good choice Axioms: When can many-good lotteries be treated as money lotteries? , 1992 .
[2] B. Gelbaum,et al. Counterexamples in Analysis , 1967 .
[3] J. Harsanyi. Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility , 1955 .
[4] Peter A. Diamond,et al. Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparison of Utility: Comment , 1967, Journal of Political Economy.
[5] P. Hammond. Consequentialist foundations for expected utility , 1988 .
[6] G. Debreu. ON THE CONTINUITY PROPERTIES OF PARETIAN UTILITY , 1963 .
[7] D. Schmeidler,et al. A More Robust Definition of Subjective Probability , 1992 .
[8] Mark J. Machina,et al. Temporal risk and the nature of induced preferences , 1984 .
[9] Evan L. Porteus,et al. Temporal von neumann-morgenstern and induced preferences , 1979 .
[10] M. Machina. Dynamic Consistency and Non-expected Utility Models of Choice under Uncertainty , 1989 .
[11] David M. Kreps. Notes On The Theory Of Choice , 1988 .
[12] G. Debreu. Mathematical Economics: Continuity properties of Paretian utility , 1964 .
[13] Larry G. Epstein,et al. Quadratic Social Welfare Functions , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.