Minimum mode saddle point searches using Gaussian process regression with inverse-distance covariance function.

The minimum mode following method can be used to find saddle points on an energy surface by following a direction guided by the lowest curvature mode. Such calculations are often started close to a minimum on the energy surface to find out which transitions can occur from an initial state of the system, but it is also common to start from the vicinity of a first order saddle point making use of an initial guess based on intuition or more approximate calculations. In systems where accurate evaluations of the energy and its gradient are computationally intensive, it is important to exploit the information of the previous evaluations to enhance the performance. Here, we show that the number of evaluations required for convergence to the saddle point can be significantly reduced by making use of an approximate energy surface obtained by a Gaussian process model based on inverse inter-atomic distances, evaluating accurate energy and gradient at the saddle point of the approximate surface and then correcting the model based on the new information. The performance of the method is tested with start points chosen randomly in the vicinity of saddle points for dissociative adsorption of an H2 molecule on the Cu(110) surface and three gas phase chemical reactions.

[1]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Exploring Potential Energy Surfaces with Saddle Point Searches , 2020, Handbook of Materials Modeling.

[2]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Nudged elastic band calculations accelerated with Gaussian process regression based on inverse inter-atomic distances. , 2019, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[3]  Alexander Denzel,et al.  Gaussian Process Regression for Transition State Search. , 2018, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[4]  Frank Neese,et al.  Software update: the ORCA program system, version 4.0 , 2018 .

[5]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Nudged elastic band calculations accelerated with Gaussian process regression. , 2017, The Journal of chemical physics.

[6]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Improved Minimum Mode Following Method for Finding First Order Saddle Points. , 2017, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[7]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Minimum energy path calculations with Gaussian process regression , 2016, 1703.10423.

[8]  H. Bernhard Schlegel,et al.  Using bonding to guide transition state optimization , 2015, J. Comput. Chem..

[9]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  GPstuff: Bayesian modeling with Gaussian processes , 2013, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Gaussian processes with monotonicity information , 2010, AISTATS.

[11]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[12]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Regression and Classification Using Gaussian Process Priors , 2009 .

[13]  Paul Sherwood,et al.  Superlinearly converging dimer method for transition state search. , 2008, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  Iain Murray,et al.  Introduction to Gaussian Processes , 2008 .

[15]  A. Bell,et al.  Efficient methods for finding transition states in chemical reactions: comparison of improved dimer method and partitioned rational function optimization method. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[16]  G. Henkelman,et al.  Comparison of methods for finding saddle points without knowledge of the final states. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[17]  James J P Stewart,et al.  Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods IV: extension of MNDO, AM1, and PM3 to more main group elements , 2004, Journal of molecular modeling.

[18]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Gaussian Processes to Speed up Hybrid Monte Carlo for Expensive Bayesian Integrals , 2003 .

[19]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Derivative Observations in Gaussian Process Models of Dynamic Systems , 2002, NIPS.

[20]  G. Henkelman,et al.  Long time scale kinetic Monte Carlo simulations without lattice approximation and predefined event table , 2001 .

[21]  N. Mousseau,et al.  Dynamics of lennard-jones clusters: A characterization of the activation-relaxation technique , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[22]  G. Henkelman,et al.  A dimer method for finding saddle points on high dimensional potential surfaces using only first derivatives , 1999 .

[23]  Lindsey J. Munro,et al.  DEFECT MIGRATION IN CRYSTALLINE SILICON , 1999 .

[24]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths of transitions , 1998 .

[25]  A. Voter Hyperdynamics: Accelerated Molecular Dynamics of Infrequent Events , 1997 .

[26]  D. Signorini,et al.  Neural networks , 1995, The Lancet.

[27]  H. Jónsson,et al.  Reversible work transition state theory: application to dissociative adsorption of hydrogen , 1994, chem-ph/9411012.

[28]  Heekuck Oh,et al.  Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition , 1993, Adv. Comput..

[29]  Jorge Nocedal,et al.  On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization , 1989, Math. Program..

[30]  J. Stewart Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods I. Method , 1989 .

[31]  J. Nocedal Updating Quasi-Newton Matrices With Limited Storage , 1980 .

[32]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Curve Fitting and Optimal Design for Prediction , 1978 .

[33]  E. Polak,et al.  Note sur la convergence de méthodes de directions conjuguées , 1969 .

[34]  C. M. Reeves,et al.  Function minimization by conjugate gradients , 1964, Comput. J..