Preservice and Early Career Teachers' Preconceptions and Misconceptions About Making in Education

Abstract This qualitative study examined preservice and early career teachers' preconceptions and misconceptions about making in education. Eighty-two preservice and early career teachers participated in brief, one-time maker workshops, then wrote reflections on their experiences. Using constant comparative analysis, researchers uncovered two common misconceptions held by the participants. The first was that making in education consisted of hands-on activities designed to achieve specific content learning objectives. The second was that making was largely dependent on the use of advanced manufacturing tools, such as three-dimensional (3D) printers. Such misconceptions could negatively impact the potential of making in education. Recommendations for resolving these misconceptions are presented, along with recommendations for future research.

[1]  Maher Z. Hashweh.  Toward an explanation of conceptual change , 1986 .

[2]  Angela Calabrese Barton,et al.  The Makerspace Movement: Sites of Possibilities for Equitable Opportunities to Engage Underrepresented Youth in STEM , 2017, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[3]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[4]  Gary S. Stager,et al.  Invent To Learn: Making, Tinkering, and Engineering in the Classroom , 2013 .

[5]  William Sadera.  Conceptual change-based instruction and preservice teacher technology preparation: a collective case study , 2001 .

[6]  Yu-Hui Ching,et al.  Learning through Making and Maker Education , 2017, TechTrends.

[7]  D. Dougherty.  The Maker Movement , 2012, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[8]  Breanne K. Litts,et al.  Learning in the Making: A Comparative Case Study of Three Makerspaces. , 2014 .

[9]  Peter Maurer,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences , 2022 .

[10]  Miguel P Caldas,et al.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches , 2003 .

[11]  T. Wubbels.  Taking account of student teachers' preconceptions , 1992 .

[12]  Jonathan Cohen,et al.  Maker Principles and Technologies in Teacher Education: A National Survey , 2017 .

[13]  Eileen Wood,et al.  Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[14]  Paulo Blikstein,et al.  Digital Fabrication and Making' in Education: The Democratization of Invention , 2013 .

[15]  R. Sawyer.  The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences: Introduction , 2014 .

[16]  E. Ackermann.  Piaget ’ s Constructivism , Papert ’ s Constructionism : What ’ s the difference ? , 2001 .

[17]  Min Kyu Kim,et al.  Teacher Beliefs and Technology Integration. , 2013 .

[18]  Francis K. H. Quek,et al.  Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children , 2015, Int. J. Child Comput. Interact..

[19]  Erica Halverson,et al.  The Maker Movement in Education , 2014, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education.

[20]  R. Florida.  A New Industrial Revolution , 1991, New Electronics.

[21]  University of California-Davis,et al.  The Promise of the Maker Movement for Education , 2017 .

[22]  Larry Cuban.  Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America , 2010 .

[23]  Douglas B. Larkin.  Misconceptions about “misconceptions”: Preservice secondary science teachers' views on the value and role of student ideas , 2012 .

[24]  T. Kalil.  Have Fun—Learn Something, Do Something, Make Something , 2013 .

[25]  Shaunna F. Smith,et al.  Preservice Teachers' Beliefs About Using Maker Activities in Formal K-12 Educational Settings: A Multi-Institutional Study , 2017 .

[26]  N. Davis,et al.  Pre‐service teachers’ preconceptions, misconceptions, and concerns about virtual schooling , 2010 .

[27]  P. Hewson,et al.  Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change , 1982 .

[28]  Kevin Oliver,et al.  Professional Development Considerations for Makerspace Leaders, Part One: Addressing “What?” and “Why?” , 2016 .

[29]  Andrea J. Sator,et al.  ‘Making’ as a catalyst for reflective practice , 2017 .

[30]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[31]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[32]  Anil Gurung,et al.  Makers: The New Industrial Revolution , 2014 .

[33]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Rise of the expert amateur: DIY projects, communities, and cultures , 2010, NordiCHI.

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  Elvira K. Katic.  Preservice teachers’ conceptions about computers: an ongoing search for transformative appropriations of modern technologies , 2008 .

[36]  Pamela Jordan.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[37]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Hands On, Hands Off: Gendered Access in Crafting and Electronics Practices , 2014 .

[38]  M. Hatch.  The Maker Movement Manifesto , 2013 .

[39]  Philip J Cowen,et al.  Constructionism , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  Exploring teaching, learning, and instructional reform in an introductory technology course , 1999 .

[41]  M. Pitman.  Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach , 1998 .