Addressing the Consequences of Dynamic Rock Failure in Underground Excavations

Rockbursts are violent events that result in the ejection of volumes of rock from the walls of underground excavations. They can be extremely hazardous and have been responsible for many accidents in underground excavations. They also are responsible for significant direct and indirect costs in mining and civil engineering projects. The occurrence of rockbursting can be reduced by optimising the design with regard to excavation layout, excavation geometry and size, excavation sequence, and by the application of destressing/preconditioning measures. Thereafter, containment of damage relies on rock support. Conventional design of rock support for the containment of rockburst damage is not possible since neither the demand that is generated, nor the capacity of support systems, are known, and thus there is a state of design indeterminacy. The approach recommended in this paper is a risk-consequence one: evaluation of the risk (the product of the probability of occurrence of a rockburst and its consequence, in financial terms), and use of this quantified risk as a decision making tool regarding the justification for significant dynamically capable rock support. A typically suitable rock support system for rockbursting conditions is suggested in the paper.

[1]  Bp Simser The Weakest Link - Ground Support Observations at Some Canadian Shield Hard Rock Mines , 2007 .

[2]  Ernesto Villaescusa,et al.  Static and dynamic testing of steel wire mesh for mining applications of rock surface support , 2008 .

[3]  Ernesto Villaescusa,et al.  Dynamic testing of reinforcement systems , 2008 .

[4]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Rock burst and slabbing failure and its influence on TBM excavation at headrace tunnels in Jinping II hydropower station , 2012 .

[5]  Yves Potvin,et al.  Towards an understanding of dynamic demand on ground support , 2013 .

[7]  Yves Potvin,et al.  In-situ dynamic testing of ground support using simulated rockbursts , 2007 .

[8]  Yves Potvin,et al.  An interpretation of ground support capacity submitted to dynamic loading , 2010 .

[9]  T. R. Stacey,et al.  ROCKBURST MECHANISMS IN TUNNELS AND SHAFTS , 1994 .

[10]  Ali Zafer Toper The effect of blasting on the rockmass for designing the most effective preconditioning blasts in deep-level gold mines , 2011 .

[11]  T. R. Stacey,et al.  Examples Of Fracturing Of Rock At Very Low Stress Levels , 2003 .

[12]  Alan Hájek,et al.  What Are Degrees of Belief? , 2007, Stud Logica.

[13]  F. Huber,et al.  Degrees of Belief , 2009 .

[14]  Chantale Doucet,et al.  TECHNICAL INFORMATION DATA SHEETS , 2012 .

[15]  Dynamic Rock Failures Due to "High" Stress at Shallow Depths , 2007 .

[16]  J. P. Bardet Numerical modeling of a rockburst as surface buckling : Proc 2nd International Symposium on Rockbursts and Seismicity in Mines, Minneapolis, 8–10 June 1988 P81–85. Publ Rotterdam: A A Balkema, 1990 , 1991 .

[17]  E Nordlund Deep hard rock mining and rock mechanics challenges , 2013 .

[18]  E. Broch,et al.  Experiences from the planning, construction and supporting of a road tunnel subjected to heavy rockbursting , 1984 .

[19]  Johan Wesseloo,et al.  Risk as a rock Engineering design Criterion , 2007 .

[20]  P Varona,et al.  Guidelines for numerical modelling of rock support for mines , 2013 .

[21]  Z. T. Bieniawski,et al.  Invited paper: Principles of engineering design for rock mechanics , 1992 .

[22]  Wd Ortlepp,et al.  Testing of tunnel support: dynamic load testing of rock support containment systems (eg wire mesh). , 1997 .

[23]  Pk Kaiser,et al.  Critical review of design principles for rock support in burst-prone ground – time to rethink! , 2013 .

[24]  Peter K. Kaiser,et al.  Impact testing for rockbolt design in rockburst conditions , 1994 .

[25]  A. McGarr,et al.  A Mechanism for High Wall-rock Velocities in Rockbursts , 1997 .

[26]  Manchao He,et al.  Development of a novel energy-absorbing bolt with extraordinarily large elongation and constant resistance , 2014 .

[27]  Joughin,et al.  The performance of Brunswick Mine's rockburst support system during a severe seismic episode , 2002 .

[28]  Ernesto Villaescusa,et al.  Development and Implementation of the Garford Dynamic Bolt at the Kanowna Belle Mine , 2008 .

[29]  T. R. Stacey,et al.  Performance of tunnel support under large deformation static and dynamic loading , 1998 .

[30]  ROCK BOLTS TESTING UNDER DYNAMIC CONDITIONS AT CANMET-MMSL , 2008 .

[31]  R Bucher,et al.  Large scale field tests of high‐tensile steel wire mesh in combination with dynamic rockbolts subjected to rockburst loading , 2013 .

[32]  Milev,et al.  Simulated rockburst experiment—an overview , 2001 .

[33]  T. R. Stacey,et al.  A potential method of containing rockburst damage and enhancing safety using a sacrificial layer , 2013 .

[34]  Johan Wesseloo,et al.  A risk consequence approach to open pit slope design , 2006 .

[35]  John Hadjigeorgiou,et al.  Overview of Dynamic Testing of Ground Support , 2007 .

[36]  B. Tarasov,et al.  Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression , 2013 .

[37]  Erling Nordlund,et al.  Rock support subjected to dynamic loading : Field testing of ground support using simulated rockburst , 2011 .

[38]  Chuanqing Zhang,et al.  Case Histories of Four Extremely Intense Rockbursts in Deep Tunnels , 2012, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.