Fast Image‐Based Modeling of Astronomical Nebulae

Astronomical nebulae are among the most complex and visually appealing phenomena known outside the bounds of the Solar System. However, our fixed vantage point on Earth limits us to a single known view of these objects, and their intricate volumetric structure cannot be recovered directly. Recent approaches to reconstructing a volumetric 3D model use the approximate symmetry inherent to many nebulae, but require several hours of computation time on large multi-GPU clusters. We present a novel reconstruction algorithm based on group sparsity that reaches or even exceeds the quality of prior results while taking only a fraction of the time on a conventional desktop PC, thereby enabling end users in planetariums or educational facilities to produce high-quality content without expensive hardware or manual modeling. In principle, our approach can be generalized to other transparent phenomena with arbitrary types of user-specified symmetries.

[1]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Ieee Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics Reconstruction and Visualization of Planetary Nebulae , 2022 .

[2]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Sparse reconstruction by separable approximation , 2009, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Marc Teboulle,et al.  A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[4]  Yoram Singer,et al.  Efficient projections onto the l1-ball for learning in high dimensions , 2008, ICML '08.

[5]  Bernard Pailthorpe,et al.  Visualizing Stars and Emission Nebulas , 2001, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[6]  J. Meaburn,et al.  Echelle observations of high-velocity lobes projecting from the core of the bipolar nebula MZ-3. , 1985 .

[7]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Sparse Reconstruction by Separable Approximation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[8]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Recovery Algorithms for Vector-Valued Data with Joint Sparsity Constraints , 2008, SIAM J. Numer. Anal..

[9]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Distributed Optimization and Statistical Learning via the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers , 2011, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..

[10]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Reflection nebula visualization , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[11]  R. Ragazzoni,et al.  The structure of planetary nebulae: theory vs. practice , 2006, astro-ph/0601283.

[12]  Kate Y. L. Su,et al.  Discovery of Multiple Coaxial Rings in the Quadrupolar Planetary Nebula NGC 6881 , 2005 .

[13]  Hektor Monteiro,et al.  THREE-DIMENSIONAL PHOTOIONIZATION STRUCTURE AND DISTANCES OF PLANETARY NEBULAE. IV. NGC 40 , 2006, 1106.3550.

[14]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Visualization of Astronomical Nebulae via Distributed Multi-GPU Compressed Sensing Tomography , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Eric Lagadec,et al.  3D Structure of the Planetary Nebula NGC 7027 , 2006 .

[16]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Shape: A 3D Modeling Tool for Astrophysics , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[17]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Constrained inverse volume rendering for planetary nebulae , 2004, IEEE Visualization 2004.

[18]  Denis Leahy Deprojection of emission in axially symmetric transparent systems , 1991 .

[19]  Marcus A. Magnor,et al.  Algebraic 3D Reconstruction of Planetary Nebulae , 2009, J. WSCG.

[20]  Wolfgang Heidrich,et al.  Stochastic tomography and its applications in 3D imaging of mixing fluids , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[21]  K. Sunkwo,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Planetary Nebulae , 2000 .

[22]  Michael G. Richer,et al.  A Cat's Eye view of the Eskimo from Saturn , 2011, Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union.