A boreal forest model benchmarking dataset for North America: a case study with the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC)

Climate change is rapidly altering composition, structure, and functioning of the boreal biome, across North America often broadly categorized into ecoregions. The resulting complex changes in different ecoregions present a challenge for efforts to accurately simulate carbon dioxide (CO2) and energy exchanges between boreal forests and the atmosphere with terrestrial ecosystem models (TEMs). Eddy covariance measurements provide valuable information for evaluating the performance of TEMs and guiding their development. Here, we compiled a boreal forest model benchmarking dataset for North America by harmonizing eddy covariance and supporting measurements from eight black spruce (Picea mariana)-dominated, mature forest stands. The eight forest stands, located in six boreal ecoregions of North America, differ in stand characteristics, disturbance history, climate, permafrost conditions and soil properties. By compiling various data streams, the benchmarking dataset comprises data to parameterize, force, and evaluate TEMs. Specifically, it includes half-hourly, gap-filled meteorological forcing data, ancillary data essential for model parameterization, and half-hourly, gap-filled or partitioned component flux data on CO2 (net ecosystem production, gross primary production [GPP], and ecosystem respiration [ER]) and energy (latent [LE] and sensible heat [H]) and their daily aggregates screened based on half-hourly gap-filling quality criteria. We present a case study with the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including Biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC) to: (1) demonstrate the utility of our dataset to benchmark TEMs and (2) provide guidance for model development and refinement. Model skill was evaluated using several statistical metrics and further examined through the flux responses to their environmental controls. Our results suggest that CLASSIC tended to overestimate GPP and ER among all stands. Model performance regarding the energy fluxes (i.e., LE and H) varied greatly among the stands and exhibited a moderate correlation with latitude. We identified strong relationships between simulated fluxes and their environmental controls except for H, thus highlighting current strengths and limitations of CLASSIC.

[1]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Tipping point in North American Arctic-Boreal carbon sink persists in new generation Earth system models despite reduced uncertainty , 2023, Environmental Research Letters.

[2]  C. Potter,et al.  Disturbances in North American boreal forest and Arctic tundra: impacts, interactions, and responses , 2022, Environmental Research Letters.

[3]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  What explains the year-to-year variation in growing season timing of boreal black spruce forests? , 2022, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology.

[4]  Praveen Kumar,et al.  Thermodynamic basis for the demarcation of Arctic and alpine treelines , 2022, Scientific Reports.

[5]  A. Rogers,et al.  Reducing model uncertainty of climate change impacts on high latitude carbon assimilation , 2021, Global change biology.

[6]  G. Abramowitz,et al.  Supplementary material to "A flux tower dataset tailored for land model evaluation" , 2021, Earth System Science Data.

[7]  Alex J. Cannon,et al.  Simulating shrubs and their energy and carbon dioxide fluxes in Canada's Low Arctic with the Canadian Land Surface Scheme Including biogeochemical Cycles (CLASSIC) , 2020 .

[8]  T. A. Black,et al.  Addressing Biases in Arctic-Boreal Carbon Cycling in the Community Land Model Version 5 , 2020 .

[9]  Libo Wang,et al.  CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 2: Global Benchmarking , 2020 .

[10]  S. Veraverbeke,et al.  Patterns of Ecosystem Structure and Wildfire Carbon Combustion Across Six Ecoregions of the North American Boreal Forest , 2020, Frontiers in Forests and Global Change.

[11]  Jonas Ardö,et al.  The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data , 2020, Scientific Data.

[12]  T. A. Black,et al.  Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate , 2020, Nature Climate Change.

[13]  A. Barr,et al.  Controls on evapotranspiration from jack pine forests in the Boreal Plains Ecozone , 2019, Hydrological Processes.

[14]  E. Chan,et al.  CLASSIC v1.0: the open-source community successor to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS) and the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) – Part 1: Model framework and site-level performance , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[15]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Improving permafrost physics in the coupled Canadian Land Surface Scheme (v.3.6.2) and Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (v.2.1) (CLASS-CTEM) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[16]  Yaxing Wei,et al.  Divergence in land surface modeling: linking spread to structure , 2019, Environmental Research Communications.

[17]  N. Batjes,et al.  Standardised soil profile data to support global mapping and modelling (WoSIS snapshot 2019) , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[18]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Scaling carbon fluxes from eddy covariance sites to globe: synthesis and evaluation of the FLUXCOM approach , 2019, Biogeosciences.

[19]  D. Lawrence,et al.  Soil Moisture and Hydrology Projections of the Permafrost Region: A Model Intercomparison , 2019 .

[20]  B. Poulter,et al.  The Arctic-Boreal vulnerability experiment model benchmarking system , 2019, Environmental Research Letters.

[21]  Stefan Lange,et al.  Trend-preserving bias adjustment and statistical downscaling with ISIMIP3BASD (v1.0) , 2019, Geoscientific Model Development.

[22]  Michelle C. Mack,et al.  Ecological Response to Permafrost Thaw and Consequences for Local and Global Ecosystem Services , 2018, Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics.

[23]  G. Bonan,et al.  Climate, ecosystems, and planetary futures: The challenge to predict life in Earth system models , 2018, Science.

[24]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Missing pieces to modeling the Arctic-Boreal puzzle , 2018 .

[25]  O. Sonnentag,et al.  Direct and indirect climate change effects on carbon dioxide fluxes in a thawing boreal forest–wetland landscape , 2017, Global change biology.

[26]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Carbon neutral or a sink? Uncertainty caused by gap-filling long-term flux measurements for an old-growth boreal black spruce forest , 2017 .

[27]  Adam J. Purdy,et al.  Ground heat flux: An analytical review of 6 models evaluated at 88 sites and globally , 2016 .

[28]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Predicting carbon dioxide and energy fluxes across global FLUXNET sites with regression algorithms , 2016 .

[29]  S. Sitch,et al.  Importance of soil thermal regime in terrestrial ecosystem carbon dynamics in the circumpolar north , 2016 .

[30]  M. Williams,et al.  The influence of vegetation and soil characteristics on active‐layer thickness of permafrost soils in boreal forest , 2016, Global change biology.

[31]  J. Pelletier,et al.  A gridded global data set of soil, intact regolith, and sedimentary deposit thicknesses for regional and global land surface modeling , 2016 .

[32]  Larry D. Hinzman,et al.  Understory CO2, sensible heat, and latent heat fluxes in a black spruce forest in interior Alaska , 2015 .

[33]  G. Katul,et al.  Coupling boreal forest CO2, H2O and energy flows by a vertically structured forest canopy – Soil model with separate bryophyte layer , 2015 .

[34]  A. Shvidenko,et al.  Boreal forest health and global change , 2015, Science.

[35]  Dario Papale,et al.  Filling the gaps in meteorological continuous data measured at FLUXNET sites with ERA-Interim reanalysis , 2015 .

[36]  Joe R. Melton,et al.  Competition between plant functional types in the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM) v. 2.0 , 2015 .

[37]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Does summer warming reduce black spruce productivity in interior Alaska? , 2015, Journal of Forest Research.

[38]  D. M. Lawrence,et al.  Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback , 2014, Nature.

[39]  G. Kiely,et al.  Model-data fusion across ecosystems : From multisite optimizations to global simulations , 2014 .

[40]  S. Sitch,et al.  Modeling the Terrestrial Biosphere , 2014 .

[41]  M. Turetsky,et al.  Differential response of carbon fluxes to climate in three peatland ecosystems that vary in the presence and stability of permafrost , 2014 .

[42]  M. Ueyama,et al.  Autumn warming reduces the CO2 sink of a black spruce forest in interior Alaska based on a nine‐year eddy covariance measurement , 2014, Global change biology.

[43]  Hideki Kobayashi,et al.  Spatial Scale and Landscape Heterogeneity Effects on FAPAR in an Open-Canopy Black Spruce Forest in Interior Alaska , 2014, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[44]  Praveena Krishnan,et al.  Eight years of forest-floor CO2 exchange in a boreal black spruce forest: Spatial integration and long-term temporal trends , 2014 .

[45]  BoisvenueC.,et al.  Carbon in Canada’s boreal forest — A synthesis1 , 2013 .

[46]  A. Pitman,et al.  Examining soil carbon uncertainty in a global model: response of microbial decomposition to temperature, moisture and nutrient limitation , 2013 .

[47]  Michael H. Unsworth,et al.  Principles of Environmental Physics: Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere , 2013 .

[48]  Philippe Ciais,et al.  Large‐scale variations in the vegetation growing season and annual cycle of atmospheric CO2 at high northern latitudes from 1950 to 2011 , 2013, Global change biology.

[49]  Steven J. Phillips,et al.  Shifts in Arctic vegetation and associated feedbacks under climate change , 2013 .

[50]  Bai Yang,et al.  The AmeriFlux Data Activity and Data System: An Evolving Collection of Data Management Techniques, Tools, Products and Services , 2013 .

[51]  A. Gonsamo,et al.  Deriving land surface phenology indicators from CO2 eddy covariance measurements , 2013 .

[52]  T. A. Black,et al.  Influence of stand age on the magnitude and seasonality of carbon fluxes in Canadian forests , 2012 .

[53]  Fabienne Maignan,et al.  Constraining a global ecosystem model with multi-site eddy-covariance data , 2012 .

[54]  E. Tuittila,et al.  The resilience and functional role of moss in boreal and arctic ecosystems. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[55]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis , 2012 .

[56]  Forrest M Hoffman,et al.  Photoperiodic regulation of the seasonal pattern of photosynthetic capacity and the implications for carbon cycling , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  North American Carbon Program (NACP) regional interim synthesis: Terrestrial biospheric model intercomparison , 2012 .

[58]  P. Ciais,et al.  Permafrost carbon-climate feedbacks accelerate global warming , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[60]  Stephan Gruber,et al.  Derivation and analysis of a high-resolution estimate of global permafrost zonation , 2011 .

[61]  J. Neff,et al.  The role of soil drainage class in carbon dioxide exchange and decomposition in boreal black spruce (Picea mariana) forest stands , 2010 .

[62]  Shaopeng Wang,et al.  Forest annual carbon cost: a global-scale analysis of autotrophic respiration. , 2010, Ecology.

[63]  A. Arneth,et al.  Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation , 2010 .

[64]  M. Williams,et al.  Improving land surface models with FLUXNET data , 2009 .

[65]  J. Brandt.  The extent of the North American boreal zone , 2009 .

[66]  T. Andrew Black,et al.  Modeling analysis of primary controls on net ecosystem productivity of seven boreal and temperate coniferous forests across a continental transect , 2008 .

[67]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[68]  David M. Lawrence,et al.  Sensitivity of a model projection of near‐surface permafrost degradation to soil column depth and representation of soil organic matter , 2008 .

[69]  Jari Liski,et al.  Heterotrophic soil respiration—Comparison of different models describing its temperature dependence , 2008 .

[70]  D. Hollinger,et al.  A method to estimate the additional uncertainty in gap-filled NEE resulting from long gaps in the CO2 flux record , 2007 .

[71]  Andrew G. Bunn,et al.  Responses of the circumpolar boreal forest to 20th century climate variability , 2007 .

[72]  T. A. Black,et al.  Comparison of carbon dioxide fluxes over three boreal black spruce forests in Canada , 2007 .

[73]  Heike Lischke,et al.  Effect of forest management on future carbon pools and fluxes: A model comparison , 2006 .

[74]  T. A. Black,et al.  Modelling multi-year coupled carbon and water fluxes in a boreal aspen forest , 2006 .

[75]  K. Davis,et al.  A multi-site analysis of random error in tower-based measurements of carbon and energy fluxes , 2006 .

[76]  David A. Wardle,et al.  Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest , 2005 .

[77]  T. Vesala,et al.  On the separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and ecosystem respiration: review and improved algorithm , 2005 .

[78]  F. Stuart Chapin,et al.  Carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange from understory species in boreal forest , 2004 .

[79]  Annika Hofgaard,et al.  The dynamics of the tundra-taiga boundary: an overview and suggested coordinated and integrated approach to research. , 2002, Ambio.

[80]  K. Taylor.  Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[81]  D. Verseghy,et al.  Parametrization of peatland hydraulic properties for the Canadian land surface scheme , 2000, Data, Models and Analysis.

[82]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  On using eco-physiological, micrometeorological and biogeochemical theory to evaluate carbon dioxide, water vapor and trace gas fluxes over vegetation: a perspective , 1998 .

[83]  K. Jon Ranson,et al.  The Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) : an overview and early results from the 1994 field year , 1995 .

[84]  Alex J. Cannon,et al.  Multivariate quantile mapping bias correction: an N-dimensional probability density function transform for climate model simulations of multiple variables , 2017, Climate Dynamics.

[85]  Stephen Sitch,et al.  A roadmap for improving the representation of photosynthesis in Earth system models. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[86]  R. Leuningb,et al.  Assessing parameter variability in a photosynthesis model within and between plant functional types using global Fluxnet eddy covariance data , 2010 .

[87]  EK VIV,et al.  A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models , 2004 .

[88]  A. D. Bradshaw,et al.  The Importance of Soil , 2003 .

[89]  W. Härdle,et al.  Statistical Theory and Computational Aspects of Smoothing , 1996 .