Estimation of vegetation Equivalent Water Thickness using hyperspectral data and partial least square regression

Vegetation water content is an important parameter to evaluate vegetation vigor. Therefore, it is very important to timely understand the vegetation moisture status, especially in the fields of agriculture and forestry. The hyperspectral data can provide continuous spectral information and shows to be a promising tool for precisely describing vegetation water content. Commonly, vegetation water content is often expressed as Equivalent Water Thickness (EWT). In this paper, using LOPEX dataset, we mainly explored the strength of partial least square regression (PLSR) models based on different spectral transformations (original reflectance, logarithmic reflectance and the first derivative reflectance) to retrieve EWT from vegetation reflectance spectra. Also, the performance of different models for EWT estimation was compared. According to the results, all three approaches using PLSR achieve high precision to predict EWT using reflectance spectra. The PLSR models with the first derivative reflectance perform the best with an estimation precision of 0.963 for calibration & 0.938 for independent validation; and the PLSR models with original reflectance follow next with an estimation precision of 0.916 for calibration & 0.859 for independent validation; and the PLSR models with logarithmic reflectance rank last with an estimation precision of 0.914 for calibration & 0.827 for independent validation. From this study, PLSR demonstrates great potential to predict EWT from hyperspectral data and the PLSR models yield the best prediction when combined with the first derivative reflectance.

[1]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Estimation of plant water concentration by the reflectance Water Index WI (R900/R970) , 1997 .

[2]  F. M. Danson,et al.  High-spectral resolution data for determining leaf water content , 1992 .

[3]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  The reflectance at the 950–970 nm region as an indicator of plant water status , 1993 .

[4]  J. Norman,et al.  Leaf Optical Properties , 1991 .

[5]  B. Rock,et al.  Detection of changes in leaf water content using Near- and Middle-Infrared reflectances , 1989 .

[6]  Ruiliang Pu,et al.  Conifer species recognition: An exploratory analysis of in situ hyperspectral data , 1997 .

[7]  William Philpot,et al.  The derivative ratio algorithm: avoiding atmospheric effects in remote sensing , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  C. Tucker Remote sensing of leaf water content in the near infrared , 1980 .

[9]  S. Tarantola,et al.  Detecting vegetation leaf water content using reflectance in the optical domain , 2001 .

[10]  Lin Li,et al.  Retrieval of vegetation equivalent water thickness from reflectance using genetic algorithm (GA)-partial least squares (PLS) regression , 2008 .

[11]  B. Gao NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space , 1996 .

[12]  D. Roberts,et al.  Deriving Water Content of Chaparral Vegetation from AVIRIS Data , 2000 .

[13]  E. Cloutis,et al.  Review Article Hyperspectral geological remote sensing: evaluation of analytical techniques , 1996 .