Persistent and transient cost efficiency—an application to the Swiss hydropower sector

Electricity prices on the European market have decreased significantly over the past few years, resulting in a deterioration of Swiss hydropower firms’ competitiveness and profitability. One option to improve the sector’s competitiveness is to increase cost efficiency. The goal of this study is to quantify the level of persistent and transient cost efficiency of individual firms by applying the generalized true random effects (GTRE) model introduced by Colombi et al. (Journal of Productivity Analysis 42(2): 123–136, 2014) and Filippini and Greene (Journal of Productivity Analysis 45(2): 187–196, 2016). Applying this newly developed GTRE model to a total cost function, the level of cost efficiency of 65 Swiss hydropower firms is analyzed for the period between 2000 and 2013. A true random effects specification is estimated as a benchmark for the transient level of cost efficiency. The results show the presence of both transient as well as persistent cost inefficiencies. The GTREM predicts the aggregate level of cost inefficiency to amount to 21.8% (8.0% transient, 13.8% persistent) on average between 2000 and 2013. These two components differ in interpretation and implication. From an individual firm’s perspective, the two types of cost inefficiencies might require a firm’s management to respond with different improvement strategies. The existing level of persistent inefficiency could prevent the hydropower firms from adjusting their production processes to new market environments. From a regulatory point of view, the results of this study could be used in the scope and determination of the amount of financial support given to struggling firms.

[1]  C. Barros.  Efficiency analysis of hydroelectric generating plants : A case study for Portugal , 2008 .

[2]  L. R. Christensen,et al.  Economies of Density versus Economies of Scale: Why Trunk and Local Service Airline Costs Differ , 1984 .

[3]  D. Jorgenson,et al.  TRANSCENDENTAL LOGARITHMIC PRODUCTION FRONTIERS , 1973 .

[4]  Sue J. Lin,et al.  Evaluation of thermal power plant operational performance in Taiwan by data envelopment analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Douglas W. Caves,et al.  Productivity Growth, Scale Economies, and Capacity Utilization in U.S. Railroads, 1955-74 , 1981 .

[6]  W. Greene,et al.  Efficiency Measurement in Network Industries: Application to the Swiss Railway Companies , 2004 .

[7]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[8]  D. Pidgeon,et al.  The efficiency of measurement , 2018 .

[9]  S. Banfi,et al.  Resource rent taxation and benchmarking—A new perspective for the Swiss hydropower sector , 2010 .

[10]  L. Bretschger.  Is the Environment Compatible with Growth? Adopting An Integrated Framework , 2016 .

[11]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Examining the cost efficiency of Chinese hydroelectric companies using a finite mixture model , 2013 .

[12]  William R. Parke.  Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimation: The Asymptotic Distribution , 1986 .

[13]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[14]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Stochastic frontier analysis , 2000 .

[15]  A. Friedlaender,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY GROWTH IN THE REGULATED TRUCKING INDUSTRY , 1983 .

[16]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  Technical efficiency in competing panel data models: a study of Norwegian grain farming , 2014 .

[17]  Massimo Filippini,et al.  Perspektiven für die Wasserkraftwerke in der Schweiz. Langfristige Wettbewerbsfähigkeit und mögliche Verbesserungspotenziale , 2001 .

[18]  D. Bös.  Public Enterprise Economics: Theory and Application , 1986 .

[19]  W. Greene.  Fixed and Random Effects in Stochastic Frontier Models , 2002 .

[20]  Gianmaria Martini,et al.  A Stochastic Frontier Model with short-run and long-run inefficiency random effects , 2011 .

[21]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Efficiency assessment and benchmarking of thermal power plants in India , 2012 .

[22]  M. Filippini,et al.  Economies of scale in the Swiss hydropower sector , 2007 .

[23]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Production frontiers with cross-sectional and time-series variation in efficiency levels , 1990 .

[24]  William H. Greene,et al.  Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach , 2014 .

[25]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  A Bayesian stochastic frontier analysis of Chinese fossil-fuel electricity generation companies , 2015 .

[26]  M. Filippini.  Economies of scale in the Swiss nursing home industry , 2001 .

[27]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[28]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[29]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[30]  W. Greene.  The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Laurits R. Christensen,et al.  The translog function and the substitution of equipment, structures, and labor in U.S. manufacturing 1929-68 , 1973 .

[32]  Subal C. Kumbhakar,et al.  FIRM HETEROGENEITY, PERSISTENT AND TRANSIENT TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY: A GENERALIZED TRUE RANDOM-EFFECTS model , 2014 .

[33]  Oleg Badunenko,et al.  Economies of scale, technical change and persistent and time-varying cost efficiency in Indian banking: Do ownership, regulation and heterogeneity matter? , 2017, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[35]  A. Zellner.  An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias , 1962 .

[36]  Giorgio Vittadini,et al.  Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency , 2014 .

[37]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An analysis of factors that influence the technical efficiency of Malaysian thermal power plants , 2012 .

[38]  Harold O. Fried,et al.  The Measurement of Productive Efficiency and Productivity Growth , 2008 .

[39]  William H. Greene,et al.  Reconsidering heterogeneity in panel data estimators of the stochastic frontier model , 2005 .

[40]  G. Battese,et al.  ESTIMATION OF A PRODUCTION FRONTIER MODEL: WITH APPLICATION TO THE PASTORAL ZONE OF EASTERN AUSTRALIA , 1977 .

[41]  Hans P. Binswanger,et al.  A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Elasticities of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution , 1974 .

[42]  Lung-fei Lee,et al.  The measurement and sources of technical inefficiency in the Indonesian weaving industry , 1981 .

[43]  Carlos Pestana Barros,et al.  The determinants of cost efficiency of hydroelectric generating plants: A random frontier approach , 2007 .

[44]  Robert A. Moffitt,et al.  A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL , 1982 .

[45]  C. Lovell,et al.  Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Frontmatter , 2000 .