Using a theory to understand triage decision making.

The purpose of this discussion is to present triage decision making research within the context of the Revised Cognitive Continuum Theory. Triage is an essential clinical skill in emergency nursing. Understanding the best way to facilitate this skill is vital when educating new nurses or providing continuing education to practicing nurses. Delineating research evidence within a theory allows clinical educators to understand practices that foster successful triage skills and permits the grounding of educational strategies within a theoretical framework.

[1]  Vimla L Patel,et al.  Calibrating urgency: triage decision-making in a pediatric emergency department , 2008, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[2]  M. Bullard,et al.  [Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale implementation guidelines]. , 2004, CJEM.

[3]  Kenneth R Hammond,et al.  Judgement and Decision Making in Dynamic Tasks , 1988 .

[4]  Arthur S Elstein,et al.  Critical thinking and clinical decision making in critical care nursing: a pilot study. , 2003, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[5]  D. Eitel,et al.  Reliability and validity of a new five-level triage instrument. , 2000, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[6]  Jane Marie Cioffi,et al.  A study of the use of past experiences in clinical decision making in emergency situations. , 2001, International journal of nursing studies.

[7]  J. Harbison.  Clinical decision making in nursing: theoretical perspectives and their relevance to practice. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[8]  T. Bucknall,et al.  Triage nurses' clinical decision making. An observational study of urgency assessment. , 2001, Journal of advanced nursing.

[9]  Kenneth R. Hammond,et al.  Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice , 2000 .

[10]  Emma Tippins.  How emergency department nurses identify and respond to critical illness. , 2005, Emergency nurse : the journal of the RCN Accident and Emergency Nursing Association.

[11]  S. Walter,et al.  Reliability of the Canadian emergency department triage and acuity scale: interrater agreement. , 1999, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  J Dowie,et al.  Clinical intuition and clinical analysis: expertise and the cognitive continuum , 1988 .

[13]  Jane Marie Cioffi,et al.  Decision making by emergency nurses in triage assessments. , 1998, Accident and emergency nursing.

[14]  A. Andersson,et al.  Triage in the emergency department--a qualitative study of the factors which nurses consider when making decisions. , 2006, Nursing in critical care.

[15]  S. French.  Professional Judgment: A Reader in Clinical Decision Making , 1988 .

[16]  David Sines,et al.  Passing the audition - the appraisal of client credibility and assessment by nurses at triage. , 2008, Journal of clinical nursing.

[17]  J. Y. Chung.  An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision making in Hong Kong. , 2005, Accident and emergency nursing.

[18]  Steve Campbell,et al.  Cognitive Continuum Theory in nursing decision-making. , 2005, Journal of advanced nursing.

[19]  Mooi Standing,et al.  Clinical judgement and decision-making in nursing - nine modes of practice in a revised cognitive continuum. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[20]  Barry McBrien.  Translating change: the development of a person-centred triage training programme for emergency nurses. , 2009, International emergency nursing.

[21]  M. Bullard,et al.  Revisions to the Canadian Emergency Department Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) adult guidelines. , 2008, CJEM.