Communicating quantities: a review of psycholinguistic evidence of how expressions determine perspectives

The way in which information about proportions, amounts, frequencies, probabilities, degrees of confidence, and risk is portrayed in natural language is not neutral, but reflects presuppositions and assumed norms. In this paper we present a review of evidence in support of this position. We show that the choice of expressions for communication depends in a systematic way on the kinds of inferences communicators draw. We go on to discuss the consequences of this for attribution phenomena, aspects of reasoning, the portrayal of uncertainty, and responses to questionnaires. We also suggest that communicator preferences for using language rather than numbers may have to do with human reasoning being argument-based, rather than with a preference for vagueness, as has been commonly claimed.

[1]  A. R. Goodwin,et al.  Are some parts larger than others? Qualifying Hammerton's quantifiers. , 1977, Applied ergonomics.

[2]  I. Erev,et al.  Verbal versus numerical probabilities: Efficiency, biases, and the preference paradox☆ , 1990 .

[3]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  The control of attributional patterns by the focusing properties of quantifying expressions , 1990, J. Semant..

[4]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Semantics and comprehension , 1976 .

[5]  S. Pepper,et al.  Sometimes frequently means seldom: Context effects in the interpretation of quantitative expressions ☆ , 1974 .

[6]  K. Teigen,et al.  Conjunction errors in the prediction of referendum outcomes: Effects of attitude and realism , 1996 .

[7]  D. K. Kagehiro.  Defining the Standard of Proof in Jury Instructions , 1990 .

[8]  David V. Budescu,et al.  A review of human linguistic probability processing: General principles and empirical evidence , 1995, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[9]  P. G. Moore,et al.  The Manager's Struggles with Uncertainty , 1977 .

[10]  Gary L. Wells,et al.  Measuring psychological uncertainty: Verbal versus numeric methods , 1996 .

[11]  Wibecke Brun,et al.  Yes, but it is uncertain: Direction and communicative intention of verbal probabilistic terms , 1995 .

[12]  Colm O'Muircheartaigh,et al.  INTENSIFIERS IN BEHAVIORAL FREQUENCY QUESTIONS , 1993 .

[13]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  How response alternatives affect different kinds of behavioural frequency questions , 1997 .

[14]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Choosing the Right Quantifier: Usage in th Context of Communication , 1997 .

[15]  S. Link,et al.  Bias in Quantifying Judgments , 1989 .

[16]  D. Clark.  Verbal uncertainty expressions: A critical review of two decades of research , 1990 .

[17]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  Response Scales: Effects of Category Range on Reported Behavior and Comparative Judgments , 1985 .

[18]  Monica Martinussen,et al.  Linda versus World Cup: Conjunctive Probabilities in Three-event Fictional and Real-life Predictions , 1996 .

[19]  S. Toulmin.  The uses of argument , 1960 .

[20]  Rami Zwick,et al.  Comparing the calibration and coherence of numerical and verbal probability judgments , 1993 .

[21]  D. Hilton,et al.  Knowledge-Based Causal Attribution: The Abnormal Conditions Focus Model , 1986 .

[22]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  QUANTIFIERS AND FOCUS , 1986 .

[23]  K. Paterson,et al.  Attentional focusing with quantifiers in production and comprehension , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Elke U. Weber,et al.  Contextual Effects in the Interpretations of Probability Words: Perceived Base Rate and Severity of Events , 1990 .

[25]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. , 1988 .

[26]  Etienne Mullet,et al.  Comprehension of verbal probability expressions in children and adolescents , 1991 .

[27]  Shawn P. Curley,et al.  Belief, knowledge, and uncertainty: A cognitive perspective on subjective probability , 1991 .

[28]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Quantifier Polarity and Referential Focus during Reading , 1998 .

[29]  P. Pollard,et al.  The effect of set size on the interpretation of quantifiers used in rating scales. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[30]  Diane M. Litynski,et al.  Influence of Food Label Quantifier Terms on Connoted Amount and Purchase Intention , 1996 .

[31]  Alf C. Zimmer,et al.  A Model for the Interpretation of Verbal Predictions , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[32]  Paul J. Krause,et al.  Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning , 1993, UAI.

[33]  P. Wason.  The contexts of plausible denial , 1965 .

[34]  Norval F. Pohl.  Scale Considerations in Using Vague Quantifiers. , 1981 .

[35]  C. Schriesheim,et al.  A Comparative Test of Magnitude Estimation and Pair-Comparison Treatment of Complete Ranks for Scaling a Small Number of Equalinterval Frequency Response Anchors , 1992 .

[36]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  The Invariance of Anchor Points Obtained by Magnitude Estimation and Pair-Comparison Treatment of Complete Ranks Scaling Procedures: an Empirical Comparison and Implications for Validity of Measurement , 1978 .

[37]  Tommy Gärling,et al.  Prediction of preferences for and choices between verbally and numerically described alternatives , 1991 .

[38]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. , 1988 .

[39]  Geoffrey Haddock.  The influence of response scale alternatives on judgments of future academic expectations , 1998 .

[40]  J Hartley,et al.  The effects of verbal and numerical quantifiers on questionnaire responses. , 1984, Applied ergonomics.

[41]  E. Poulton.  Unwanted range effects from using within-subject experimental designs. , 1973 .

[42]  M Hammerton,et al.  How much is a large part? , 1976, Applied ergonomics.

[43]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgments of and by Representativeness , 1981 .

[44]  Robert J. Jarvella,et al.  Scales in the Interpretation of Words, Sentences, and Texts , 1994, J. Semant..

[45]  Wibecke Brun,et al.  Verbal probabilities: Ambiguous, context-dependent, or both? , 1988 .

[46]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  Policy as Argument-A Logic for Ill-Structured Decision Problems , 1982 .

[47]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Development and Empirical Verification of New Response Categories to Increase the Validity of Multiple Response Alternative Questionnaires , 1974 .

[48]  Frederick Mosteller,et al.  Quantitative meanings of verbal probability expressions. , 1989 .

[49]  A. Sanford,et al.  Communicating Quantities: A Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[50]  C. O'muircheartaigh,et al.  Testing the multiplicative hypothesis of intensifiers , 1995 .

[51]  Daniel B. Wright,et al.  How much is 'quite a bit'? Mapping between numerical values and vague quantifiers , 1994 .

[52]  Thomas S. Wallsten,et al.  Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions , 1986 .

[53]  E. Poulton.  The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. , 1968 .

[54]  Robert D. Behn,et al.  Quick Analysis for Busy Decision Makers , 1984 .

[55]  D. Budescu,et al.  Preferences and reasons for communicating probabilistic information in verbal or numerical terms , 1993 .

[56]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms , 1986 .

[57]  A. J. Sanford.  The control of attentional focus by quantifiers , 1990 .

[58]  Anthony J. Sanford,et al.  Prior expectation and the interpretation of natural language quantifiers , 1993 .