Experimental validation of a true-scale morphing flap for large civil aircraft applications

Within the framework of the JTI-Clean Sky (CS) project, and during the first phase of the Low Noise Configuration Domain of the Green Regional Aircraft – Integrated Technological Demonstration (GRA-ITD, the preliminary design and technological demonstration of a novel wing flap architecture were addressed. Research activities were carried out to substantiate the feasibility of morphing concepts enabling flap camber variation in compliance with the demanding safety requirements applicable to the next generation green regional aircraft, 130- seats with open rotor configuration. The driving motivation for the investigation on such a technology was found in the opportunity to replace a conventional double slotted flap with a single slotted camber-morphing flap assuring similar high lift performances -in terms of maximum attainable lift coefficient and stall angle- while lowering emitted noise and system complexity. Studies and tests were limited to a portion of the flap element obtained by slicing the actual flap geometry with two cutting planes distant 0.8 meters along the wing span. Further activities were then addressed in order to increase the TRL of the validated architecture within the second phase of the CS-GRA. Relying upon the already assessed concept, an innovative and more advanced flap device was designed in order to enable two different morphing modes on the basis of the A/C flight condition / flap setting: Mode1, Overall camber morphing to enhance high-lift performances during take-off and landing (flap deployed); Mode2, Tab-like morphing mode. Upwards and downwards deflection of the flap tip during cruise (flap stowed) for load control at high speed. A true-scale segment of the outer wing flap (4 meters span with a mean chord of 0.9 meters) was selected as investigation domain for the new architecture in order to duly face the challenges posed by real wing installation. Advanced and innovative solutions for the adaptive structure, actuation and control systems were duly analyzed and experimentally validated thus proving the overall device compliance with industrial standards and applicable airworthiness requirements.

[1]  Gianluca Amendola,et al.  Distributed actuation concepts for a morphing aileron device , 2016 .

[2]  Ignazio Dimino,et al.  Actuation System Design for a Morphing Wing Trailing Edge , 2014 .

[3]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Actuation and control of a novel wing flap architecture with bi-modal camber morphing capabilities , 2016, 2016 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE).

[4]  Gianluca Amendola,et al.  Validation of a smart structural concept for wing-flap camber morphing , 2014 .

[5]  Jamey Jacob,et al.  ACTIVE CONTROL OF SEPARATION ON A WING WITH CONFORMAL CAMBER , 2001 .

[6]  Antonio Concilio,et al.  Design and Functional Test of a Morphing High-Lift Device for a Regional Aircraft , 2011 .

[7]  A. Concilio,et al.  An adaptive control system for wing TE shape control , 2013, Smart Structures.

[8]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Wing chamber control architectures based on SMA: numerical investigations , 2007, International Conference on Smart Materials and Nanotechnology in Engineering.

[9]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Toward the bi-modal camber morphing of large aircraft wing flaps: the CleanSky experience , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[10]  R. Pecora,et al.  Airfoil Structural Morphing Based on S.M.A. Actuator Series: Numerical and Experimental Studies , 2011 .

[11]  Ignazio Dimino,et al.  Safety and Reliability Aspects of an Adaptive Trailing Edge Device (ATED) , 2016 .

[12]  Gianluca Amendola,et al.  Experimental characterization of an adaptive aileron: lab tests and FE correlation , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[13]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Modeling and testing of a morphing wing in open-loop architecture , 2010 .

[14]  Ignazio Dimino,et al.  Structural Design of an Adaptive Wing Trailing Edge for Enhanced Cruise Performance , 2016 .

[15]  Michael Grünewald,et al.  Multi-Functional Morphing Trailing Edge for Control of All-Composite, All-Electric Flying Wing Aircraft , 2008 .

[16]  Gianluca Amendola,et al.  Numerical design of an adaptive aileron , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[17]  Ignazio Dimino,et al.  KRISTINA: Kinematic rib-based structural system for innovative adaptive trailing edge , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[18]  Alexander Hasse,et al.  Design of compliant mechanisms with selective compliance , 2009 .

[19]  Antonio Concilio,et al.  A single slotted morphing flap based on SMA technology , 2016 .

[20]  Antonio Concilio,et al.  A SMA-based morphing flap:conceptual and advanced design , 2015 .

[21]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Preliminary failure analysis of an innovative morphing flap tailored for large civil aircraft applications , 2016, 2016 7th International Conference on Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering (ICMAE).

[22]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of Morphing Technologies on Aircraft Performance , 2002 .

[23]  Rosario Pecora,et al.  Multi-parametric flutter analysis of a morphing wing trailing edge , 2014, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[24]  Michael I. Friswell,et al.  The Design of Morphing Aerofoils using Compliant Mechanisms , 2008 .

[25]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Novel, bi-directional, variable camber airfoil via macro-fiber composite actuators , 2009 .

[26]  Darryll J. Pines,et al.  Pneumatic Morphing Aspect Ratio Wing , 2004 .

[27]  Ignazio Dimino,et al.  Distributed electromechanical actuation system design for a morphing trailing edge wing , 2016, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.