Influence of Metal Implants on Quantitative Evaluation of Bone Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography

When visualizing biological activity at nonunion sites by the radioisotopes, gamma rays are more attenuated if metal implants are placed in the bone. However, the effects of various implant types and their placement on gamma ray attenuation in quantitative evaluation remain unknown. To elucidate these effects, we created a phantom that simulated the nonunion of the femur in this study. The count of gamma rays was measured by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) while considering CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC), metal implant placement, type (intramedullary nail or plate), and position. The count differed significantly with and without CTAC and with and without implants (both types) under CTAC. Significantly different counts were observed between the intramedullary nail and plate placed contralaterally to the lesion (i.e., non-lesion side). No significant difference was observed between the intramedullary nail and plate on the lesion side or between plates on the non-lesion and lesion sides. The measured standardized uptake value (SUV) was closer to the true SUV with CTAC than without. Moreover, the count was higher with implants than without. However, even with implants, it was lower than the actual count, indicating the absence of overcorrection. Implant type and position do not seem to influence the count.

[1]  Moustafa Elsayed,et al.  Plate augmentation and bone grafting in treatment of femoral shaft nonunion initially fixed by intramedullary nail , 2022, SICOT-J.

[2]  Troy D. Bornes,et al.  Surgical outcomes of dual-plate fixation for periprosthetic femur fractures around a stable hip arthroplasty stem , 2021, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[3]  T. Murakami,et al.  Quantitative bone single-photon emission computed tomography imaging for uninfected nonunion: comparison of hypertrophic nonunion and non-hypertrophic nonunion , 2020, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[4]  H. Gupta,et al.  Reunion of post nail aseptic non-union of diaphyseal femoral fractures by augmentation plating, decortication and bone grafting - Replacement for exchange nailing. , 2020, Injury.

[5]  Maria del Sol Pèrez-Lago,et al.  Value of SPECT/CT in the assessment of necrotic bone fragments in patients with delayed bone healing or non-union after traumatic fractures. , 2020, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  S. Stewart Fracture Non-Union: A Review of Clinical Challenges and Future Research Needs , 2019, Malaysian orthopaedic journal.

[7]  W. Khan,et al.  Radiological Imaging Evaluation of the Failing Total Hip Replacement , 2019, Front. Surg..

[8]  Ying-Chao Chou,et al.  Augmentative antirotational plating provided a significantly higher union rate than exchanging reamed nailing in treatment for femoral shaft aseptic atrophic nonunion - retrospective cohort study , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[9]  T. Kuwert,et al.  SPECT/CT in Postoperative Hand and Wrist Pain. , 2018, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[10]  Iain Duncan,et al.  The clinical value of xSPECT/CT Bone versus SPECT/CT. A prospective comparison of 200 scans , 2018, European Journal of Hybrid Imaging.

[11]  R. Steen,et al.  An inception cohort analysis to predict nonunion in tibia and 17 other fracture locations. , 2017, Injury.

[12]  Y. Niu,et al.  Augmentative locking plate with autologous bone grafting for distal femoral nonunion subsequent to failed retrograde intramedullary nailing , 2016, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[13]  K. Miwa,et al.  [Development of a Novel Body Phantom with Bone Equivalent Density for Evaluation of Bone SPECT]. , 2015, Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi.

[14]  M. Kurosaka,et al.  Comparison of radiographic appearance and bone scintigraphy in fracture nonunions. , 2013, Orthopedics.

[15]  K. Koshida,et al.  Adjustment of Overestimated CT-Based Attenuation Correction on Bone SPECT/CT After Hip-Resurfacing Arthroplasty , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[16]  M. Lell,et al.  SPECT/CT in patients with lower back pain after lumbar fusion surgery , 2012, Nuclear medicine communications.

[17]  N. Takenaka,et al.  Infra-isthmal fracture is a risk factor for nonunion after femoral nailing: a case–control study , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[18]  C. Critchlow,et al.  Patient-related risk factors for fracture-healing complications in the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[19]  J. Achten,et al.  SPECT/CT bone imaging after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: isit feasible to use CT attenuation correction in the presenceof metal implants? , 2011, Nuclear medicine communications.

[20]  F. Middleton,et al.  Radionuclide arthrogram with SPECT/CT for the evaluation of mechanical loosening of hip and knee prostheses , 2010, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[21]  J. Keating,et al.  Cigarette smoking and open tibial fractures. , 2001, Injury.