Experimental investigation of CO2 huff-n-puff process for enhancing oil recovery in tight reservoirs

Abstract Due to the feature of tight formation, the primary oil recovery is usually very low and leaves substantial oil still in place. This fact results in a strong motivation of applying an enhancing oil recovery (EOR) method to further increase the oil recovery. In the present work, CO 2 huff-n-puff process as a potential EOR method for tight oils was experimentally investigated in 0.3 md cores. The visual tests proved that the oil swelling factor and CO 2 solubility increased with pressure. The core tests indicated that CO 2 huff-puff process is a viable technique to promote tight oil recovery. The magnitude of oil recovery is strongly dependent on CO 2 pressure, the oil recovery can reach 30.9% at 16 MPa in our experiment. Compared multi- to single-cyclic operation, the oil recovery is further increased by 10% by a four-cycle operation. However, after two cycles, the oil recovery significantly dropped. Differential production pressure (ΔP) is the dominant parameter for tight oil recovery in CO 2 huff-puff process. This work is supposed to provide some necessary clues for pilot design.

[1]  Chaodong Yang,et al.  Diffusion coefficients and oil swelling factors of carbon dioxide, methane, ethane, propane, and their mixtures in heavy oil , 2006 .

[2]  S. A. Farzaneh,et al.  Experimental investigation of CO2-foam stability improvement by alkaline in the presence of crude oil , 2015 .

[3]  Yongan Gu,et al.  Oil Recovery and Permeability Reduction of a Tight Sandstone Reservoir in Immiscible and Miscible CO2 Flooding Processes , 2011 .

[4]  T. Monger-Mcclure,et al.  Feasibility of Cyclic CO2 Injection for Light-Oil Recovery , 1991 .

[5]  Shawkat G. Ghedan.  Global Laboratory Experience of CO2-EOR Flooding , 2009 .

[6]  D. Beliveau,et al.  Waterflood and CO2 Flood of the Fractured Midale Field (includes associated paper 22947 ) , 1993 .

[7]  Zhiwu Liang,et al.  Enhanced light oil recovery from tight formations through CO2 huff ‘n’ puff processes , 2015 .

[8]  J. J. Taber,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Flooding , 1992 .

[9]  J. J. Taber,et al.  Technical Screening Guides for the Enhanced Recovery of Oil , 1983 .

[10]  S. Sayegh,et al.  Laboratory Evaluation Of The CO Huff-N-Puff Process For Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 1984 .

[11]  A. Kane.  Performance Review of a Large-Scale CO2-WAG Enhanced Recovery Project, SACROC Unit Kelly-Snyder Field , 1979 .

[12]  R. Simon,et al.  Generalized Correlations for Predicting Solubility, Swelling and Viscosity Behavior of CO2 -Crude Oil Systems , 1965 .

[13]  G. Willhite,et al.  Swelling/Extraction Test of a Small Sample Size for Phase Behavior Study , 2010 .

[14]  B. Towler,et al.  Modelling the CO2 Huff'n' Puff process in solution-gas-drive reservoirs using a black-oil simulator , 1992 .

[15]  T. G. Monger,et al.  A laboratory and field evaluation of the CO2 huff n puff process for light-oil recovery , 1988 .

[16]  Mahmoud Jamiolahmady,et al.  Safe storage of Co2 together with improved oil recovery by Co2-enriched water injection , 2011 .

[17]  N. Kalogerakis,et al.  Predictions of Co2 solubility and CO2 saturated liquid density of heavy oils and bitumens using a cubic equation of state , 1991 .

[18]  Helen K. Haskin,et al.  An Evaluation of CO2 Huff 'n' Puff Tests in Texas , 1989 .

[19]  Steven A. Smith,et al.  Geologic Characterization of a Bakken Reservoir for Potential CO2 EOR , 2013 .

[20]  R. C. Earlougher,et al.  CO2 Injection As An Immiscible Application For Enhanced Recovery In Heavy Oil Reservoirs , 1981 .

[21]  B. Wei.  Flow characteristics of three enhanced oil recovery polymers in porous media , 2015 .

[22]  Marcia Reeves Simpson,et al.  The CO2 Huff 'n' Puff Process in a Bottomwater-Drive Reservoir , 1988 .

[23]  T. G. Monger,et al.  Light Oil Recovery From Cyclic CO2 Injection: Influence of Low Pressures Impure CO2, and Reservoir Gas , 1991 .

[24]  A. Abedini,et al.  Oil Recovery Performance of Immiscible and Miscible CO2 Huff-and-Puff Processes , 2014 .