Application of Ligand- and Structure-Based Prediction Models for the Design of Alkylhydrazide-Based HDAC3 Inhibitors as Novel Anti-Cancer Compounds

Histone deacetylases (HDAC) represent promising epigenetic targets for several diseases including different cancer types. The HDAC inhibitors approved to date are pan-HDAC inhibitors and most show a poor selectivity profile, side effects, and in particular hydroxamic-acid-based inhibitors lack good pharmacokinetic profiles. Therefore, the development of isoform-selective non-hydroxamic acid HDAC inhibitors is a highly regarded field in medicinal chemistry. In this study, we analyzed different ligand-based and structure-based drug design techniques to predict the binding mode and inhibitory activity of recently developed alkylhydrazide HDAC inhibitors. Alkylhydrazides have recently attracted more attention as they have shown promising effects in various cancer cell lines. In this work, pharmacophore models and atom-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models were generated and evaluated. The binding mode of the studied compounds was determined using molecular docking as well as molecular dynamics simulations and compared with known crystal structures. Calculated free energies of binding were also considered to generate QSAR models. The created models show a good explanation of in vitro data and were used to develop novel HDAC3 inhibitors.

[1]  R. Shaw,et al.  HDAC3 is critical in tumor development and therapeutic resistance in Kras-mutant non–small cell lung cancer , 2023, Science advances.

[2]  W. Sippl,et al.  Development of Alkylated Hydrazides as Highly Potent and Selective Class I Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors with T cell Modulatory Properties. , 2022, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  Xiao-Hua Yu,et al.  Histone Deacetylase 3: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Atherosclerosis , 2022, Aging and disease.

[4]  W. Sippl,et al.  Docking, Binding Free Energy Calculations and In Vitro Characterization of Pyrazine Linked 2-Aminobenzamides as Novel Class I Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors , 2022, Molecules.

[5]  W. Sippl,et al.  Synthesis, Molecular Docking and Biological Characterization of Pyrazine Linked 2-Aminobenzamides as New Class I Selective Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors with Anti-Leukemic Activity , 2021, International journal of molecular sciences.

[6]  Min Li,et al.  Potent Hydrazide-Based HDAC Inhibitors with a Superior Pharmacokinetic Profile for Efficient Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia In Vivo. , 2021, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[7]  W. Sippl,et al.  Species-selective targeting of pathogens revealed by the atypical structure and active site of Trypanosoma cruzi histone deacetylase DAC2. , 2021, Cell reports.

[8]  W. Cao,et al.  Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) as an important epigenetic regulator of kidney diseases , 2021, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[9]  B. Ghosh,et al.  Dissecting Histone Deacetylase 3 in Multiple Disease Conditions: Selective Inhibition as a Promising Therapeutic Strategy. , 2021, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[10]  W. Sippl,et al.  Strategies To Design Selective Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors , 2021, ChemMedChem.

[11]  D. Klein,et al.  Discovery of Highly Selective and Potent HDAC3 Inhibitors Based on a 2-Substituted Benzamide Zinc Binding Group. , 2020, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[12]  Lisa Y. Zhao,et al.  Discovery of histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3)-specific PROTACs. , 2020, Chemical communications.

[13]  Kyle L. Morris,et al.  The MiDAC histone deacetylase complex is essential for embryonic development and has a unique multivalent structure , 2020, Nature Communications.

[14]  James I. Fells,et al.  Selective Class I HDAC Inhibitors Based on Aryl Ketone Zinc Binding Induce HIV-1 Protein for Clearance. , 2020, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[15]  Y. Peterson,et al.  Design of hydrazide-bearing HDACIs based on panobinostat and their p53 and FLT3-ITD dependency in anti-leukemia activity. , 2020, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  James I. Fells,et al.  Discovery of ethyl ketone-based HDACs 1, 2, and 3 selective inhibitors for HIV latency reactivation. , 2020, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[17]  S. Gradilone,et al.  Role of Histone Deacetylases in Carcinogenesis: Potential Role in Cholangiocarcinoma , 2020, Cells.

[18]  N. Adhikari,et al.  Histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) inhibitors as anticancer agents: A review. , 2020, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[19]  Jeong-Sun Kim,et al.  A short guide to histone deacetylases including recent progress on class II enzymes , 2020, Experimental & Molecular Medicine.

[20]  S. Kochetkov,et al.  Synthesis of N'-propylhydrazide analogs of hydroxamic inhibitors of histone deacetylases (HDACs) and evaluation of their impact on activities of HDACs and replication of hepatitis C virus (HCV). , 2019, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[21]  G. Sartor,et al.  Inhibition of HDAC3 reverses Alzheimer’s disease-related pathologies in vitro and in the 3xTg-AD mouse model , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Takayoshi Suzuki,et al.  Characterization of Histone Deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) Selective Inhibition Reveals Specific Active Site Structural and Functional Determinants. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Y. Peterson,et al.  Class I HDAC Inhibitors Display Different Antitumor Mechanism in Leukemia and Prostatic Cancer Cells Depending on Their p53 Status. , 2018, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  W. Sippl,et al.  A Novel Class of Schistosoma mansoni Histone Deacetylase 8 (HDAC8) Inhibitors Identified by Structure-Based Virtual Screening and In Vitro Testing , 2018, Molecules.

[25]  Bryce K. Allen,et al.  Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations in Drug Discovery: Recent Advances and Practical Considerations , 2017, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  A. Mai,et al.  Lysine Deacetylase Inhibitors in Parasites: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives. , 2017, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[27]  D. Sivaraj,et al.  Panobinostat for the management of multiple myeloma. , 2017, Future oncology.

[28]  Y. Peterson,et al.  Development of Allosteric Hydrazide-Containing Class I Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors for Use in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  S. Steinbacher,et al.  Kinetic and structural insights into the binding of histone deacetylase 1 and 2 (HDAC1, 2) inhibitors. , 2016, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry.

[30]  Jorge Cadima,et al.  Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[31]  J. Gottesfeld,et al.  The Effects of Pharmacological Inhibition of Histone Deacetylase 3 (HDAC3) in Huntington’s Disease Mice , 2016, PloS one.

[32]  W. Sippl,et al.  Structure-Based Design and Synthesis of Novel Inhibitors Targeting HDAC8 from Schistosoma mansoni for the Treatment of Schistosomiasis. , 2016, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  R. Bürli,et al.  Potent, Selective, and CNS-Penetrant Tetrasubstituted Cyclopropane Class IIa Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors. , 2016, ACS medicinal chemistry letters.

[34]  Jennifer L. Knight,et al.  OPLS3: A Force Field Providing Broad Coverage of Drug-like Small Molecules and Proteins. , 2016, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[35]  Cheng Huang,et al.  Epigenetic modifications by histone deacetylases: Biological implications and therapeutic potential in liver fibrosis. , 2015, Biochimie.

[36]  A. Hekmatdoost,et al.  The role dietary of bioactive compounds on the regulation of histone acetylases and deacetylases: a review. , 2015, Gene.

[37]  S. Genheden,et al.  The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities , 2015, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[38]  W. Sippl,et al.  Docking and binding free energy calculations of sirtuin inhibitors. , 2015, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[39]  Ryan L. Stowe,et al.  Identification of histone deacetylase inhibitors with benzoylhydrazide scaffold that selectively inhibit class I histone deacetylases. , 2015, Chemistry & biology.

[40]  J. Said,et al.  Growth inhibition of pancreatic cancer cells by histone deacetylase inhibitor belinostat through suppression of multiple pathways including HIF, NFkB, and mTOR signaling in vitro and in vivo , 2014, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[41]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Parameterization of Highly Charged Metal Ions Using the 12-6-4 LJ-Type Nonbonded Model in Explicit Water , 2014, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[42]  E. Seto,et al.  Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. , 2014, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology.

[43]  R. Bürli,et al.  Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent and selective class IIa histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as a potential therapy for Huntington's disease. , 2013, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[44]  Benjamin E. L. Lauffer,et al.  Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor Kinetic Rate Constants Correlate with Cellular Histone Acetylation but Not Transcription and Cell Viability , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[45]  B. Barneda-Zahonero,et al.  Histone deacetylases and cancer , 2012, Molecular oncology.

[46]  Kyoung-Jae Won,et al.  Nuclear Receptor Corepressors are Required for the Histone Deacetylase Activity of HDAC3 In Vivo , 2012, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[47]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  MMPBSA.py: An Efficient Program for End-State Free Energy Calculations. , 2012, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[48]  B. Gryder,et al.  Targeted cancer therapy: giving histone deacetylase inhibitors all they need to succeed. , 2012, Future medicinal chemistry.

[49]  J. Schwabe,et al.  Structure of HDAC3 bound to corepressor and inositol tetraphosphate , 2011, Nature.

[50]  J. Schwabe,et al.  Structural basis for the assembly of the SMRT/NCoR core transcriptional repression machinery , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[51]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation , 2010, Molecular informatics.

[52]  M. Navre,et al.  Exploration of the HDAC2 foot pocket: Synthesis and SAR of substituted N-(2-aminophenyl)benzamides. , 2010, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[53]  Vanhaecke Tamara,et al.  Histone deacetylase inhibition and the regulation of cell growth with particular reference to liver pathobiology , 2009, Journal of cellular and molecular medicine.

[54]  E. Olson,et al.  Maintenance of cardiac energy metabolism by histone deacetylase 3 in mice. , 2008, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[55]  S. Denslow,et al.  The human Mi-2/NuRD complex and gene regulation , 2007, Oncogene.

[56]  K. He,et al.  Vorinostat for Treatment of Cutaneous Manifestations of Advanced Primary Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma , 2007, Clinical Cancer Research.

[57]  Andreas Schwienhorst,et al.  Histone deacetylases—an important class of cellular regulators with a variety of functions , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[58]  T. Kouzarides Chromatin Modifications and Their Function , 2007, Cell.

[59]  Lauren Wickstrom,et al.  Secondary structure bias in generalized Born solvent models: comparison of conformational ensembles and free energy of solvent polarization from explicit and implicit solvation. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[60]  David E. Shaw,et al.  PHASE: a new engine for pharmacophore perception, 3D QSAR model development, and 3D database screening: 1. Methodology and preliminary results , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[61]  Jessica E. Bolden,et al.  Anticancer activities of histone deacetylase inhibitors , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[62]  Steven L Dixon,et al.  PHASE: A Novel Approach to Pharmacophore Modeling and 3D Database Searching , 2006, Chemical biology & drug design.

[63]  B. Weinhold Epigenetics: The Science of Change , 2006, Virchows Archiv.

[64]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[65]  M. Fraga,et al.  Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[66]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[67]  O. Wiest,et al.  On the function of the 14 A long internal cavity of histone deacetylase-like protein: implications for the design of histone deacetylase inhibitors. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[68]  Yong Duan,et al.  Distinguish protein decoys by Using a scoring function based on a new AMBER force field, short molecular dynamics simulations, and the generalized born solvent model , 2004, Proteins.

[69]  D. Case,et al.  Exploring protein native states and large‐scale conformational changes with a modified generalized born model , 2004, Proteins.

[70]  Ivan V. Gregoretti,et al.  Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family: functional implications of phylogenetic analysis. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[71]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Performance comparison of generalized born and Poisson methods in the calculation of electrostatic solvation energies for protein structures , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[72]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[73]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[74]  Minoru Yoshida,et al.  FK228 (depsipeptide) as a natural prodrug that inhibits class I histone deacetylases. , 2002, Cancer research.

[75]  J. Qin,et al.  Both corepressor proteins SMRT and N‐CoR exist in large protein complexes containing HDAC3 , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[76]  James D. Winkler,et al.  Cloning and Characterization of a Novel Human Class I Histone Deacetylase That Functions as a Transcription Repressor* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[77]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[78]  G Brosch,et al.  Amide analogues of trichostatin A as inhibitors of histone deacetylase and inducers of terminal cell differentiation. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[79]  Weidong Wang,et al.  NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[80]  Wen‐Ming Yang,et al.  Histone Deacetylases Associated with the mSin3 Corepressor Mediate Mad Transcriptional Repression , 1997, Cell.

[81]  Gregory D. Hawkins,et al.  Parametrized Models of Aqueous Free Energies of Solvation Based on Pairwise Descreening of Solute Atomic Charges from a Dielectric Medium , 1996 .

[82]  B. Brooks,et al.  An analysis of the accuracy of Langevin and molecular dynamics algorithms , 1988 .

[83]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[84]  J O Westgard,et al.  Principal component analysis: an alternative to "referee" methods in method comparison studies. , 1975, Analytical chemistry.

[85]  E. Olson,et al.  The many roles of histone deacetylases in development and physiology: implications for disease and therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[86]  Stuart L Schreiber,et al.  Deacetylase enzymes: biological functions and the use of small-molecule inhibitors. , 2002, Chemistry & biology.

[87]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..