Prototype for the harvesting of cultivated herbaceous energy crops, an economic and technical evaluation.

Abstract The scope of this study was to evaluate a multi-purpose prototype, the biotriturator, for the harvesting of biomass species cultivated in Northern Italy that would allow the baling of biomass to reduce the handling and storage costs. Harvesting trials were conducted on two herbaceous perennials: giant reed ( Arundo donax L.) and switchgrass ( Panicum virgatum L.), plus a herbaceous annual fiber sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). A technical and economic evaluation compared three harvesting systems in which the biomass was shredded with the biotriturator. The first system was a cutting-shredding-baling in the same operation. The second required two successive steps, the first was cutting and shredding with the biotriturator, the second was baling. The third harvesting system required three successive steps: cutting and shredding with the biotriturator, windrowing with star wheel rakes and baling. While the first and second systems were evaluated on the two perennial crops the third was evaluated on an annual crop. Considering the hectares that can be covered by the biotriturator (170 ha of sorghum and 270 of switchgrass, with an average annual use of 200 h) and the total harvest cost (9.9–12.1 € Mg −1 dry biomass), the harvesting system represents an effective solution for situations like that in Italy, where average farm sizes are small.

[1]  John S. Cundiff.  Simulation of five large round bale harvesting systems for biomass , 1996 .

[2]  Shahab Sokhansanj,et al.  Large‐scale production, harvest and logistics of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) – current technology and envisioning a mature technology , 2009 .

[3]  G. Trebbi.  Power-production options from biomass : the vision of a southern European utility , 1993 .

[4]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Biomass yield and energy balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) cropped in central Italy as related to different management practices , 2005 .

[5]  K. Kadam,et al.  Rice straw as a lignocellulosic resource: collection, processing, transportation, and environmental aspects , 2000 .

[6]  U. Schneider,et al.  Multi-farm economic analysis of perennial energy crops in Central Greece, taking into account the CAP reform , 2011 .

[7]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance , 2009 .

[8]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Influence of fertilisation and harvest time on fuel quality of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) in central Italy , 2010 .

[9]  S. Amaducci,et al.  Crop yield and quality parameters of four annual fibre crops (hemp, kenaf, maize and sorghum) in the North of Italy , 2000 .

[10]  Ingwald Obernberger,et al.  Evaluation of the combustion characteristics of four perennial energy crops (Arundo donax, Cynara cardunculus, Miscanthus x giganteus and Panicum virgatum) , 2004 .

[11]  John S. Cundiff,et al.  Harvest and storage costs for bales of switchgrass in the southeastern United States , 1996 .

[12]  Ajit K. Srivastava,et al.  Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines , 1993 .

[13]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  Economics of a coordinated biorefinery feedstock harvest system: lignocellulosic biomass harvest cost , 2004 .

[14]  Daniel Nilsson,et al.  SHAM—a simulation model for designing straw fuel delivery systems. Part 1: model description , 1999 .

[15]  J. Scurlock,et al.  The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe , 2003 .

[16]  Alvin R. Womac,et al.  Biomass Harvesting of High-Yield Low-Moisture Switchgrass: Equipment Performance and Moisture Relations , 2012 .

[17]  Monforti-Ferrario Fabio,et al.  Renewable Energy Snapshots 2011 , 2011 .