The relation of flow cytometry to clinical and biologic characteristics in women with node negative primary breast cancer

Flow cytometry (FC) analysis including DNA index (ploidy status) and cell kinetics (%S and %S + G2/M) was done on frozen tissue of the primary lesions of 101 women with node negative (N−) breast cancer who were studied prospectively. Currently, 19% (19/101) of the patients have recurred. No significant relations have been found between recurrence or survival and age, estrogen/progesterone receptor status, tumor size, and tumor type. The DNA index (ploidy) was not related to any clinical variable, time to recurrence, or survival. Aneuploid tumors did, however, have significantly higher %S phase activity. Patients with %S activity less than or equal to the median value were significantly different from those patients with %S above the median. They were older and had a higher frequency of ER/PR positive and well‐ or moderately differentiated tumors. Patients with %S + G2/M greater than the median value showed shorter time to recurrence (P = .055) and shorter survival (P = .006), whereas %S alone was significantly associated only with survival. Multivariate analysis showed that neither DNA index nor cell kinetics was significantly associated with time to relapse. DNA index was not significantly associated with survival; %S was of borderline significance whereas %S + %G2/M was a significant independent predictor of survival. Although FC data may provide independent information related to survival in N–women, additional research in a larger number of patients is needed to define its precise role in patient management.

[1]  G M Clark,et al.  Prediction of relapse or survival in patients with node-negative breast cancer by DNA flow cytometry. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  R. Gelber,et al.  Association of DNA index and S-phase fraction with prognosis of nodes positive early breast cancer. , 1987, Cancer research.

[3]  Edwin Silverberg,et al.  Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project , 1987, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[4]  R. W. Baldwin,et al.  Tumour aneuploidy, prognostic parameters and survival in primary breast cancer. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[5]  O. Kallioniemi,et al.  Aneuploid DNA content and high S-phase fraction of tumour cells are related to poor prognosis in patients with primary breast cancer. , 1987, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[6]  S. Fosså,et al.  Primary breast cancer: Flow cytometric dna pattern in relation to clinical and histopathologic characteristics , 1986 .

[7]  Robert W. McDivitt,et al.  A proposed classification of breast cancer based on kinetic information derived from a comparison of risk factors in 168 primary operable breast cancers , 1986, Cancer.

[8]  M. Daidone,et al.  Cell kinetics as a prognostic marker in node‐negative breast cancer , 1985, Cancer.

[9]  L. Skoog,et al.  DNA distribution, cytosol estrogen receptors and axillary nodes as prognostic predictors in breast carcinoma. , 1985, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[10]  M. Daidone,et al.  Cell kinetics and in vitro chemosensitivity as a tool for improved management of patients. , 1985, European journal of cancer & clinical oncology.

[11]  D. Seckinger,et al.  Prognostic indicators including DNA histogram type, receptor content, and staging related to human breast cancer patient survival. , 1984, Cancer research.

[12]  J. Meyer,et al.  A method for dissociation of viable human breast cancer cells that produces flow cytometric kinetic information similar to that obtained by thymidine labeling. , 1984, Cancer research.

[13]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Flow cytometry in clinical cancer research. , 1983, Cancer research.

[14]  M. M. McCrate,et al.  Prediction of early course of breast carcinoma by thymidine labeling , 1983, Cancer.

[15]  M. Melamed,et al.  Flow cytometry of breast carcinoma: I. Relation of DNA ploidy level to histology and estrogen receptor , 1981, Cancer.

[16]  E. Sugarbaker,et al.  Preparation of tissues for DNA flow cytometric analysis. , 1980, Cytometry.

[17]  G. Murphy,et al.  Management and survival of female breast cancer: Results of a national survey by the American college of surgeons , 1980, Cancer.

[18]  J. Meyer,et al.  Relationships of S-phase fraction of breast carcinoma in relapse to duration of remission, estrogen receptor content, therapeutic responsiveness, and duration of survival. , 1980, Cancer research.

[19]  T. Kute,et al.  Improvements in steroid receptor assays including rapid computer analysis of data. , 1980, Analytical biochemistry.

[20]  G. Bonadonna,et al.  Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients , 1978, Cancer.

[21]  C. Haagensen Treatment of curable carcinoma of the breast. , 1977, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  J. Fried Method for the quantitative evaluation of data from flow microfluorometry. , 1976, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[23]  B. Fisher,et al.  The pathology of invasive breast cancer A Syllabus Derived from Findings of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (Protocol No. 4) , 1975, Cancer.

[24]  I. Ariel,et al.  Results of treating 1, 178 patients with breast cancer by radical mastectomy and postoperative irradiation where metastases to axillary lymph nodes occurred , 1979, Journal of surgical oncology.