Open-ended participatory design as prototypical practice

This article argues in favour of seeing co-design as an open-ended exploration where prototypical practices are explored that engender favourable conditions for ongoing negotiation of meaning. Participatory design approaches to designing for specific practices are reviewed with particular focus on how to handle constantly evolving practices, where some design researchers argue for creating open and flexible technical systems while others emphasise design as primarily concerned with questions of changing practices. By discussing an extended participatory design project in which new ways of engaging in informal learning through self-produced videos were explored in an intensive care unit, I argue first and foremost for viewing co-design as prototypical practice which is explored through an open-ended exploration of possibilities. Second, I argue that a focus on practice necessarily requires in situ explorations to see if the proposed design explorations invoke relevant prototypical practices in the midst of work. Third, I argue that a focus on practice entails viewing tools as temporary props for various settings, rather than as central features that define the settings of learning, knowing and working.

[1]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Configuring Places for Learning — Participatory Development of Learning Practices at Work , 2005 .

[2]  Maria Francesca Costabile,et al.  End-User Development Empowering people to flexibly employ advanced information and communication technology , 2003 .

[3]  Elisa Giaccardi Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture , 2005, Leonardo.

[4]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Reflections on a Work-Oriented Design Project , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Erling Bjarki Björgvinsson Socio-material mediations : learning, knowing and self-produced media within healthcare , 2007 .

[6]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[7]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[8]  S. L. Star,et al.  Power, Technology and the Phenomenology of Conventions: On being Allergic to Onions , 1990 .

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[11]  Douglas Schuler,et al.  Participatory Design: Principles and Practices , 1993 .

[12]  Thomas Binder Intent, Form, and Materiality in the Design of Interaction Technology , 2002, Social Thinking - Software Practice.

[13]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development , 2006, End User Development.

[14]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[15]  Per-Anders Hillgren Ready-made-media-actions: lokal produktion och användning av audiovisuella medier inom hälso- och sjukvården , 2006 .

[16]  Marc Berg,et al.  Rationalizing Medical Work: Decision-support Techniques and Medical Practices , 2022 .

[17]  Thomas Binder Participation and reification in design of artifacts: An interview with etienne wenger , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[18]  Thomas Binder,et al.  Supporting reflection and dialogue in a community of machine setters: Lessons learned from design and use of a hypermedia type training material , 2007, AI & SOCIETY.

[19]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Located Accountabilities in Technology Production , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..