Unsupervised band selection for hyperspectral image analysis

Band selection is a common approach to reduce the data dimensionality of hyperspectral imagery. It extracts several bands of importance in some sense by taking advantage of high spectral correlation. Driven by detection or classification accuracy, one would expect that using a subset of original bands the accuracy is unchanged or tolerably degraded while computational burden is significantly relaxed. When the desired object information is known, this task can be achieved by finding the bands that contain the most information about these objects. When the desired object information is unknown, i.e., unsupervised band selection, the objective is to select the most distinctive and informative bands. It is expected that these bands can provide an overall satisfactory detection and classification performance. In this paper, we propose unsupervised band selection algorithms based on band similarity measurement. The preliminary result shows that our approach can yield a better result in terms of information conservation and class separability than other widely used techniques.

[1]  Peter Bajcsy,et al.  Methodology for hyperspectral band and classification model selection , 2003, IEEE Workshop on Advances in Techniques for Analysis of Remotely Sensed Data, 2003.

[2]  Qian Du,et al.  A joint band prioritization and band-decorrelation approach to band selection for hyperspectral image classification , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[3]  P. Groves,et al.  Methodology For Hyperspectral Band Selection , 2004 .

[4]  Mingyi He,et al.  Band selection based on feature weighting for classification of hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[5]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Estimation of number of spectrally distinct signal sources in hyperspectral imagery , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Chein-I Chang,et al.  Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach , 1994, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[7]  Qian Du,et al.  A comparative study for orthogonal subspace projection and constrained energy minimization , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  N. Keshava,et al.  Distance metrics and band selection in hyperspectral processing with applications to material identification and spectral libraries , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Edward M. Bassett,et al.  Information-theory-based band selection and utility evaluation for reflective spectral systems , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[10]  Ye Zhang,et al.  A Novel Geometry-Based Feature-Selection Technique for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2007, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[11]  Paul Scheunders,et al.  A band selection technique for spectral classification , 2005, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[12]  Qian Du,et al.  A linear constrained distance-based discriminant analysis for hyperspectral image classification , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  Michael W. Prairie,et al.  Visual method for spectral band selection , 2004, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.