Playing educational math games at home: The Monkey Tales case

Abstract In research on educational games, the majority of studies have been executed in controlled school settings: the home as a context in which educational games are played, is still underexplored. However, the home context is becoming more important, as children are increasingly encouraged or even required to engage with learning content at home through educational games. In this article, we describe a study of Monkey Tales , an educational math game targeted at primary school children. Using a combination of a multimodal game analysis and a six-month user study with eight children aged 10–11 and their families, we provide a detailed account of how players interpret and appropriate Monkey Tales at home. We investigate to what extent players develop tactics to appropriate the game to suit their personal interests. The study showed that in the home context, respondents used various tactics to avoid educational content. We describe the implications of these appropriation tactics for the generalizability of effectivity research, and for the design of educational games.

[1]  Karen Schrier Using digital games to teach history and historical thinking , 2014 .

[2]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Design Principles for Serious Games in Mathematics , 2014, Panhellenic Conference on Informatics.

[3]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Eudaimonic Design, or: Six Invitations to Rethink Gamification , 2014 .

[4]  Michael de Certeau,et al.  Chapter 3 Michel de Certeau and Resistance as the Practice of Everyday Life , 2013 .

[5]  Karla R. Hamlen Children's choices and strategies in video games , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  B. Winn The Design, Play, and Experience Framework , 2009 .

[7]  Bieke Zaman,et al.  MemoLine: evaluating long-term UX with children , 2013, IDC.

[8]  Jichen Zhu,et al.  Towards balancing learner autonomy and pedagogical process in educational games , 2014, CHI PLAY.

[9]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[10]  Jesper Juul,et al.  The Open and the Closed: Games of Emergence and Games of Progression , 2002, CGDC Conf..

[11]  C. Jewitt The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis , 2014 .

[12]  Carey Jewitt,et al.  Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies , 2013 .

[13]  H. L. Horne-Moyer,et al.  The Use of Electronic Games in Therapy: a Review with Clinical Implications , 2014, Current Psychiatry Reports.

[14]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[15]  K. Stueber,et al.  How to Think about Rules and Rule Following , 2005 .

[16]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Re-space-ing place: "place" and "space" ten years on , 2006, CSCW '06.

[17]  Josênia Antunes Vieira,et al.  KRESS, Gunther. Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, Routledge, 2010. , 2012 .

[18]  Ed H. Chi,et al.  A Position Paper on 'Living Laboratories': Rethinking Ecological Designs and Experimentation in Human-Computer Interaction , 2009, HCI.

[19]  Katherine Isbister,et al.  Designing games for learning: insights from conversations with designers , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Martin Valcke,et al.  Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Patrice Torguet,et al.  Serious Game and Students' Learning Motivation: Effect of Context Using Prog&Play , 2012, ITS.

[22]  Umberto Eco,et al.  The Role of the Reader , 1979 .

[23]  C. Davies Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others , 1999 .

[24]  Antti Salovaara,et al.  Repurposive Appropriation and Creative Technology Use in Human{Computer Interaction , 2012 .

[26]  Konstantin Mitgutsch,et al.  Purposeful by design?: a serious game design assessment framework , 2012, FDG.

[27]  U. Eco,et al.  Interpretation and Overinterpretation , 1992 .

[28]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  I just made love: the system and the subject of experience , 2012, CHI EA '12.

[29]  Ellie Harmon,et al.  Stories of the Smartphone in everyday discourse: conflict, tension & instability , 2013, CHI.

[30]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Design Principles for Serious Video Games in Mathematics Education: From Theory to Practice , 2014, Int. J. Serious Games.

[31]  Magnus Haake,et al.  A Teachable-Agent Arithmetic Game's Effects on Mathematics Understanding, Attitude and Self-efficacy , 2011, AIED.

[32]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Thing and I: Understanding the Relationship Between User and Product , 2005, Funology.

[33]  Yavuz Samur,et al.  The effects of an educational video game on mathematical engagement , 2015, Education and Information Technologies.

[34]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[35]  D. Rader Social Semiotics , 2013 .

[36]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  Cognitive abilities, digital games and arithmetic performance enhancement: A study comparing the effects of a math game and paper exercises , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Douglas B. Clark,et al.  Digital Games, Design, and Learning , 2016, Review of educational research.

[38]  Meng-Tzu Cheng,et al.  An educational game for learning human immunology: What do students learn and how do they perceive? , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[39]  Wan Fatimah Bt Wan Ahmad,et al.  Development of a Mathematics courseware : Fractions , 2010 .

[40]  M. Morris,et al.  The Design , 1998 .

[41]  Paul Dourish,et al.  The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[42]  Marian Aleson-Carbonell,et al.  Serious games and learning effectiveness: The case of It's a Deal! , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Alessandro De Gloria,et al.  Designing Effective Serious Games: Opportunities and Challenges for Research , 2010, Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn..

[44]  G. Kress ‘Partnerships in research’: multimodality and ethnography , 2011 .

[45]  Paul Dourish Evolution in the Adoption and Use of Collaborative Technologies , 1999 .

[46]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Beyond the user: use and non-use in HCI , 2009, OZCHI.

[47]  Thrasyvoulos Tsiatsos,et al.  Implementing a Game for Supporting Learning in Mathematics. , 2014 .

[48]  Jason Nolan,et al.  Beyond gamification: reconceptualizing game-based learning in early childhood environments , 2014 .

[49]  K. Squire From Content to Context: Videogames as Designed Experience , 2006 .

[50]  Theo van Leeuwen,et al.  Introducing social semiotics , 2005 .

[51]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Parenting and Video Games , 2016 .

[52]  Selen Turkay,et al.  Toward Understanding the Potential of Games for Learning: Learning Theory, Game Design Characteristics, and Situating Video Games in Classrooms , 2014 .

[53]  G. Kress Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication , 2009 .

[54]  David Geerts,et al.  Researching user interpretation beyond designer intentions , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[55]  Espen Aarseth,et al.  I Fought the Law: Transgressive Play and The Implied Player , 2007, DiGRA Conference.

[56]  U. Eco,et al.  The Role of the Reader: Explorations in the Semiotics of Texts , 1980 .

[57]  David Geerts,et al.  The Fun and the Serious in an Educational Game: The Monkey Tales Case , 2015, CHI.

[58]  Rosie Flewitt,et al.  Multimodality and ethnography: working at the intersection , 2011 .

[59]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  An ethnographic approach to design , 2002 .