Rigid and non-rigid geometrical transformations of a marker-cluster and their impact on bone-pose estimation.

When stereophotogrammetry and skin-markers are used, bone-pose estimation is jeopardised by the soft tissue artefact (STA). At marker-cluster level, this can be represented using a modal series of rigid (RT; translation and rotation) and non-rigid (NRT; homothety and scaling) geometrical transformations. The NRT has been found to be smaller than the RT and claimed to have a limited impact on bone-pose estimation. This study aims to investigate this matter and comparatively assessing the propagation of both STA components to bone-pose estimate, using different numbers of markers. Twelve skin-markers distributed over the anterior aspect of a thigh were considered and STA time functions were generated for each of them, as plausibly occurs during walking, using an ad hoc model and represented through the geometrical transformations. Using marker-clusters made of four to 12 markers affected by these STAs, and a Procrustes superimposition approach, bone-pose and the relevant accuracy were estimated. This was done also for a selected four marker-cluster affected by STAs randomly simulated by modifying the original STA NRT component, so that its energy fell in the range 30-90% of total STA energy. The pose error, which slightly decreased while increasing the number of markers in the marker-cluster, was independent from the NRT amplitude, and was always null when the RT component was removed. It was thus demonstrated that only the RT component impacts pose estimation accuracy and should thus be accounted for when designing algorithms aimed at compensating for STA.

[1]  K. Mardia,et al.  Statistical Shape Analysis , 1998 .

[2]  P D Milburn,et al.  Determining rigid body transformation parameters from ill-conditioned spatial marker co-ordinates. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of superficial soft tissue local displacements during movement: a feasibility study. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Angelo Cappello,et al.  Quantification of soft tissue artefact in motion analysis by combining 3D fluoroscopy and stereophotogrammetry: a study on two subjects. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[6]  J. Challis A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  Jean-Philippe Thiran,et al.  Soft Tissue Artifact Assessment During Treadmill Walking in Subjects With Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[8]  Michael Aichinger,et al.  Monte Carlo Simulation , 2013 .

[9]  I Söderkvist,et al.  Determining the movements of the skeleton using well-configured markers. , 1993, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  Hanna Schell,et al.  On the influence of soft tissue coverage in the determination of bone kinematics using skin markers , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[11]  Anthony G Schache,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of soft-tissue artifact and its effect on knee joint kinematics during functional activity. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  B. Galna,et al.  Quantification of soft tissue artifact in lower limb human motion analysis: a systematic review. , 2010, Gait & Posture.

[13]  R Dumas,et al.  Generalized mathematical representation of the soft tissue artefact. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Edward R. Valstar,et al.  Soft-tissue artefact assessment during step-up using fluoroscopy and skin-mounted markers. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  A point cluster method for in vivo motion analysis: applied to a study of knee kinematics. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  R Dumas,et al.  A model of the soft tissue artefact rigid component. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  A hip joint kinematics driven model for the generation of realistic thigh soft tissue artefacts. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  F. Veldpaus,et al.  A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  A soft tissue artefact model driven by proximal and distal joint kinematics. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  C. Spoor,et al.  Rigid body motion calculated from spatial co-ordinates of markers. , 1980, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  What portion of the soft tissue artefact requires compensation when estimating joint kinematics? , 2015, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  R Dumas,et al.  Feasibility of incorporating a soft tissue artefact model in multi-body optimisation , 2012, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[23]  U.D. Croce,et al.  Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Reconstruction of skeletal movement using skin markers: comparative assessment of bone pose estimators , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[25]  Aurelio Cappozzo,et al.  Metrics for Describing Soft-Tissue Artefact and Its Effect on Pose, Size, and Shape of Marker Clusters , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  B. Fregly,et al.  A solidification procedure to facilitate kinematic analyses based on video system data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  P R Cavanagh,et al.  ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  William R Taylor,et al.  The weighted optimal common shape technique improves identification of the hip joint center of rotation in vivo , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[29]  N. Zheng,et al.  Investigation of soft tissue movement during level walking: translations and rotations of skin markers. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  T P Andriacchi,et al.  Correcting for deformation in skin-based marker systems. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[31]  M Damsgaard,et al.  Surface marker cluster translation, rotation, scaling and deformation: Their contribution to soft tissue artefact and impact on knee joint kinematics. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  Hartmut Witte,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate system of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--part I: ankle, hip, and spine. International Society of Biomechanics. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  Tony Monnet,et al.  Can optimal marker weightings improve thoracohumeral kinematics accuracy? , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  Vicente Mata,et al.  Kinematic description of soft tissue artifacts: quantifying rigid versus deformation components and their relation with bone motion , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[35]  Michael Damsgaard,et al.  A linear soft tissue artefact model for human movement analysis: proof of concept using in vivo data. , 2012, Gait & posture.

[36]  Álvaro Page,et al.  Propagation of soft tissue artifacts to the center of rotation: a model for the correction of functional calibration techniques. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Soft tissue artifact distribution on lower limbs during treadmill gait: Influence of skin markers' location on cluster design. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[38]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 3. Soft tissue artifact assessment and compensation. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[39]  R Dumas,et al.  Soft tissue artifact compensation by linear 3D interpolation and approximation methods. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.