Smartphone preferences and brand loyalty: A discrete choice model reflecting the reference point and peer effect

Brand loyalty and interest have significant impacts on consumers' smartphone choices. What about brand loyalty and interest of smartphone in South Korea where Samsung originates from? This study investigates brand loyalty and interest and how they are affected by the satisfaction of innovative peers in South Korea. An asymmetric discrete choice model with reference-dependent preferences is applied for the analysis. The estimation results show that in South Korea the brand is the most important attribute of smartphone and Apple is the strongest in brand loyalty. Whether consumers who are currently owners of Apple smartphones continue to maintain the same brand in their next purchasing depends not only on their brand loyalty but also on the satisfaction of their highly innovative peers who currently own the Apple. On the other hand, Samsung's brand loyalty is lower than that of Apple, but the brand interest is the highest. Additionally, in all smartphone brands, satisfaction with smartphone brands owned by innovative peers has a significant impact on consumers' interest.

[1]  Wenshin Chen,et al.  The importance of enhancing, maintaining and saving face in smartphone repurchase intentions of Chinese early adopters: An exploratory study , 2017, Inf. Technol. People.

[2]  Hyunjoo Lee,et al.  Determining the factors that influence college students' adoption of smartphones , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[3]  Timothy B. Folta Governance and uncertainty: the trade‐off between administrative control and commitment , 1998 .

[4]  Jongsu Lee,et al.  Do people really want renewable energy? Who wants renewable energy?: Discrete choice model of reference-dependent preference in South Korea , 2018, Energy Policy.

[5]  Junghun Kim,et al.  Reference-dependent preferences on smart phones in South Korea: Focusing on attributes with heterogeneous preference direction , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[6]  A. Rangaswamy,et al.  Customer satisfaction and loyalty in online and offline environments , 2003 .

[7]  J. Aaker Dimensions of Brand Personality , 1997 .

[8]  P. Ganesan,et al.  Smart Phone Attribute Choice and Brand Importance for Millennial Customers , 2014 .

[9]  N. Azad,et al.  The impact of brand value on brand selection: Case study of mobile phone selection , 2012 .

[10]  Jing Wang,et al.  Modeling Choice Interdependence in a Social Network , 2013, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Daniel Baier Bayesian Methods for Conjoint Analysis-Based Predictions : Do we Still Need Latent Classes? , 2014 .

[12]  K. Train Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[13]  Charles F. Hofacker,et al.  Measuring consumer innovativeness , 1991 .

[14]  G. Schwarz Estimating the Dimension of a Model , 1978 .

[15]  Scott A. Neslin,et al.  Pursuing the Value-Conscious Consumer: Store Brands versus National Brand Promotions , 2001 .

[16]  Stefan Hoffmann,et al.  A cognitive model to predict domain-specific consumer innovativeness , 2010 .

[17]  Yeonbae Kim,et al.  Estimating the extent of potential competition in the Korean mobile telecommunications market: Switching costs and number portability , 2006 .

[18]  Kevin Lane Keller Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity , 1993 .

[19]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[20]  Kim H. Y. Hahn,et al.  Salient antecedents of mobile shopping intentions: Media dependency, fashion/brand interest and peer influence , 2013 .

[21]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives , 2016, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[22]  Son K. Lam,et al.  Resistance to Brand Switching when a Radically New Brand is Introduced: A Social Identity Theory Perspective , 2010 .

[23]  L. Petruzzellis Mobile phone choice: technology versus marketing. The brand effect in the Italian market , 2010 .

[24]  J. Louviere,et al.  Comparing Structural Equation Models with Discrete Choice Experiments for Modelling Brand Equity and Predicting Brand Choices , 2007 .

[25]  Deborah Marshall,et al.  Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[26]  Robert D. Gerwin,et al.  Understanding the mechanisms , 2010 .

[27]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response , 2016 .

[28]  Yoonmo Koo,et al.  An empirical analysis of switching cost in the smartphone market in South Korea , 2016 .

[29]  P. Kotler,et al.  Principles of Marketing , 1983 .

[30]  Taiwan╃Tso-Jen The Analyses of Purchasing Decisions and Brand Loyalty for Smartphone Consumers , 2016 .

[31]  Rosemary R. Seva,et al.  The influence of cellular phone attributes on users' affective experiences: a cultural comparison. , 2009 .

[32]  Bruno Ferman,et al.  Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions , 2014 .

[33]  Anand Kumar,et al.  Gadget lovers , 2007 .

[34]  T. Chartrand The Role of Conscious Awareness in Consumer Behavior , 2005 .

[35]  G. Tellis,et al.  Global Consumer Innovativeness: Cross-Country Differences and Demographic Commonalities , 2009 .

[36]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[37]  D. Hensher,et al.  Analyzing loss aversion and diminishing sensitivity in a freight transport stated choice experiment , 2010 .

[38]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[39]  Sang Yup Lee,et al.  Examining the factors that influence early adopters' smartphone adoption: The case of college students , 2014, Telematics Informatics.

[40]  John M. Rose,et al.  Asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay estimates in discrete choice models , 2008 .

[41]  Ian J. Bateman,et al.  Reducing gain-loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change , 2009 .

[42]  K. Huarng,et al.  Winning strategies for innovation and high-technology products management , 2011 .

[43]  Namkee Park,et al.  Factors influencing smartphone use and dependency in South Korea , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  H. Akaike,et al.  Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle , 1973 .

[45]  Kenneth Train,et al.  Mixed Logit with Bounded Distributions of Correlated Partworths , 2005 .

[46]  R. Ballantyne,et al.  The evolution of brand choice , 2006 .

[47]  Junghun Kim,et al.  Can mobile and biometric payments replace cards in the Korean offline payments market? Consumer preference analysis for payment systems using a discrete choice model , 2019, Telematics Informatics.

[48]  Greg M. Allenby,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Multiple Response Data , 2003 .

[49]  Stefan Stieger,et al.  Users of the main smartphone operating systems (iOS, Android) differ only little in personality , 2017, PloS one.

[50]  Andrew Daly,et al.  Allowing for heterogeneous decision rules in discrete choice models: an approach and four case studies , 2011 .

[51]  Manoj A. Thomas,et al.  Mobile Payment , 2013, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

[52]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[53]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[54]  Woong-Kyu Lee,et al.  The roles of brand loyalty and switching costs in the purchase of a new smartphone , 2016 .

[55]  Terry L. Childers Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of an Opinion Leadership Scale , 1986 .

[56]  Yeolib Kim,et al.  Differential innovation of smartphone and application use by sociodemographics and personality , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Roberto Verganti,et al.  Radical Design and Technology Epiphanies: A New Focus for Research on Design Management , 2011 .

[58]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..