Movement of ‘gating charge’ is coupled to ligand binding in a G-protein-coupled receptor

Activation by agonist binding of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) controls most signal transduction processes. Although these receptors span the cell membrane, they are not considered to be voltage sensitive. Recently it was shown that both the activity of GPCRs and their affinity towards agonists are regulated by membrane potential. However, it remains unclear whether GPCRs intrinsically respond to changes in membrane potential. Here we show that two prototypical GPCRs, the m2 and m1 muscarinic receptors (m2R and m1R), display charge-movement-associated currents analogous to ‘gating currents’ of voltage-gated channels. The gating charge–voltage relationship of m2R correlates well with the voltage dependence of the affinity of the receptor for acetylcholine. The loop that couples m2R and m1R to their G protein has a crucial function in coupling voltage sensing to agonist-binding affinity. Our data strongly indicate that GPCRs serve as sensors for both transmembrane potential and external chemical signals.

[1]  I. Parnas,et al.  The M2 Muscarinic G-protein-coupled Receptor Is Voltage-sensitive* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  J. Vandenberg,et al.  Sensitivity limits for voltage control of P2Y receptor‐evoked Ca2+ mobilization in the rat megakaryocyte , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1990 .

[4]  A. Marty,et al.  The initiation of calcium release following muscarinic stimulation in rat lacrimal glands. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Charge Translocation by the Na/K Pump a , 1997, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  J. Wess,et al.  Delineation of muscarinic receptor domains conferring selectivity of coupling to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins and second messengers. , 1990, Molecular pharmacology.

[7]  C. Gachet,et al.  Direct voltage control of signaling via P2Y1 and other Galphaq-coupled receptors. , 2005, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  U. Gether Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[9]  J. Lechleiter,et al.  Distinct sequence elements control the specificity of G protein activation by muscarinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[10]  C. Dessauer,et al.  G(alpha)(i) controls the gating of the G protein-activated K(+) channel, GIRK. , 2002, Neuron.

[11]  D. Loo,et al.  Relaxation kinetics of the Na+/glucose cotransporter. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  K. Page,et al.  The role of charge interactions in muscarinic agonist binding, and receptor-response coupling. , 1995, Life sciences.

[13]  D. Linden,et al.  Long-term synaptic depression in the mammalian brain , 1994, Neuron.

[14]  M. Sokolovsky,et al.  Evidence for involvement of the voltage-dependent Na+ channel gating in depolarization-induced activation of G-proteins. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[15]  J. Wess G‐protein‐coupled receptors: molecular mechanisms involved in receptor activation and selectivity of G‐protein recognition , 1997, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[16]  Yasushi Okamura,et al.  Phosphoinositide phosphatase activity coupled to an intrinsic voltage sensor , 2005, Nature.

[17]  J. Nakai,et al.  Location of a region of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor involved in selective effector coupling , 1988, FEBS letters.

[18]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Currents Related to Movement of the Gating Particles of the Sodium Channels , 1973, Nature.

[19]  K. Shirato,et al.  G protein modulation of voltage-sensitive muscarinic receptor signalling in mouse pancreatic acinar cells , 2001, Pflügers Archiv.

[20]  D Winne,et al.  [Receptor theory in pharmacology]. , 1967, Die Medizinische Welt.

[21]  T. Haga,et al.  Reconstitution of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Guanine nucleotide-sensitive high affinity binding of agonists to purified muscarinic receptors reconstituted with GTP-binding proteins (Gi and Go). , 1986, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[22]  E. El-Fakahany,et al.  An arginine residue conserved in most G protein-coupled receptors is essential for the function of the m1 muscarinic receptor. , 1994, Molecular pharmacology.

[23]  I. Parnas,et al.  Autoreceptors, membrane potential and the regulation of transmitter release , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  A. Levey,et al.  Activation of Group II Metabotropic Glutamate Receptors Inhibits Synaptic Excitation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Cut-open oocyte voltage-clamp technique. , 1998, Methods in enzymology.

[26]  F Bezanilla,et al.  Inactivation of the sodium channel. II. Gating current experiments , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.

[27]  T. Kenakin Principles: receptor theory in pharmacology. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[28]  C. Gachet,et al.  Direct Voltage Control of Signaling via P2Y1 and Other Gαq-coupled Receptors* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  I. Parnas,et al.  The Metabotropic Glutamate G-protein-coupled Receptors mGluR3 and mGluR1a Are Voltage-sensitive* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  H. Parnas,et al.  Depolarization Affects the Binding Properties of Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors and Their Interaction with Proteins of the Exocytic Apparatus* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  A ternary complex model explains the agonist-specific binding properties of the adenylate cyclase-coupled beta-adrenergic receptor. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  R. Lefkowitz,et al.  Constitutive activity of receptors coupled to guanine nucleotide regulatory proteins. , 1993, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[33]  F Bezanilla,et al.  Inactivation of the sodium channel. I. Sodium current experiments , 1977, The Journal of general physiology.