A unified approach for the design of high ductility steel frames with concentric braces in the framework of Eurocode 8

SUMMARY Eurocode 8 (EC8) stipulates design methods for frames with diagonal braces and for chevron braced frames, which differ as regards the numerical model adopted, the value of the behavior factor q and the estimation of the lateral strength provided by braces. Instead, in this paper, the use of the same design method is suggested for both types of concentrically braced frames. The design method is a generalization of the one proposed for chevron braced frames in a previous study. A numerical investigation is conducted to assess the reliability of this design method. A set of concentrically braced frames is designed according to the EC8 and proposed design methods. The seismic response of these frames is determined by nonlinear dynamic analysis. Finally, it is demonstrated that the proposed design method is equivalent to those provided by EC8, because it can ensure the same level of structural safety which would be expected when using EC8. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Murat Dicleli,et al.  Physical Theory Hysteretic Model for Steel Braces , 2008 .

[2]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[3]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Effect of gravity columns on mitigation of drift concentration for braced frames , 2009 .

[4]  Giuseppe Brandonisio,et al.  Seismic design of concentric braced frames , 2012 .

[5]  Melina Bosco,et al.  Design method and behavior factor for steel frames with buckling restrained braces , 2013 .

[6]  Khalid M. Mosalam,et al.  Comparison of European and Japanese seismic design of steel building structures , 2005 .

[7]  Luís Simões da Silva,et al.  Design of Steel Structures: Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures, Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings , 2010 .

[8]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A design procedure for dual eccentrically braced systems: Analytical formulation , 2013 .

[9]  R Tremblay,et al.  Achieving a Stable Inelastic Seismic Response for Multi-Story Concentrically Braced Steel Frames , 2003 .

[10]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Ductile design of steel structures , 1997 .

[11]  Taijiro Nonaka,et al.  An elastic-plastic analysis of a bar under repeated axial loading , 1973 .

[12]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  A unitary approach for the design of concentrically braced frames , 2011 .

[13]  Yoshihiro Kimura,et al.  Effect of Column Stiffness on Braced Frame Seismic Behavior , 2004 .

[14]  Maria Gabriella Mulas,et al.  The seismic response of concentrically braced moment-resisting steel frames , 1996 .

[15]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Influence of the link overstrength factor on the seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames , 2007 .

[16]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  SEISMIC RESPONSE OF CONCENTRICALLY BRACED STEEL FRAMES MADE WITH RECTANGULAR HOLLOW BRACING MEMBERS , 2003 .

[17]  Mario D'Aniello,et al.  Seismic behaviour of dual steel concentric braced frames , 2011 .

[18]  Pier Paolo Rossi,et al.  Seismic behaviour of eccentrically braced frames , 2009 .

[19]  Masayoshi Nakashima,et al.  Comparison of Strength Capacity for Steel Building Structures in the United States and Japan , 2003 .

[20]  Edoardo M. Marino,et al.  Seismic performance and new design procedure for chevron-braced frames , 2006 .

[21]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic design of low- and medium-rise chevron braced steel frames , 2000 .

[22]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic performance of low- and medium-rise chevron braced steel frames , 2001 .

[23]  Dawn E. Lehman,et al.  Influence of gusset plate connections and braces on the seismic performance of X‐braced frames , 2011 .

[24]  Motohide Tada,et al.  Static and dynamic post-buckling behavior of truss structures , 1998 .

[25]  Ahmed Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Assessment of European seismic design procedures for steel framed structures , 2010 .

[26]  A. Y. Elghazouli,et al.  Behaviour of tubular steel members under cyclic axial loading , 2006 .