Mathematical models for fluid–solid interaction and their numerical solutions

Abstract This paper considers various approaches used currently for the fluid–solid interaction problem and associated computational methodologies. The validity of the mathematical models for fluid–solid interaction is established based on the consistency in the use of continuum mechanics principles and whether the interaction between the solid and the fluid is inherent in the mathematical model or is established external to the mathematical model through interface constraint equations. Computational methodologies are considered from the point of view of unconditional stability, accuracy, and adaptivity of the numerical schemes employed. In particular, the paper establishes that fluid–solid interaction physics must be intrinsic in the mathematical model(s), the mathematical models for fluid and solid must have the same description, either Eulerian with transport, Lagrangian, or Eulerian without transport. Since fluids require the Eulerian description with transport, a similar description for solid matter (hypo-elastic solid) indeed provides a mathematical model for fluid–solid interaction in which the fluid–solid interaction is intrinsic in the mathematical model. The mathematical models for solid matter in the Lagrangian description or in the Eulerian description without transport and for fluids in the Eulerian description with transport can never interact due to fundamental differences in their derivations and the basic assumptions employed. For example, the Eulerian description with transport for fluids precludes material point displacements, which are intrinsically present in the Lagrangian description and the Eulerian description without transport, and they are needed for interaction of the fluid with the solid. The mathematical models for solid matter in the Lagrangian description, the Eulerian description without transport, and for fluids in the Eulerian description with transport are presented to illustrate why fluid–solid interaction is not possible with these mathematical models. The ALE methodologies using the mathematical models in Lagrangian and Eulerian descriptions have been carefully evaluated and are demonstrated to be invalid for a consistent formulation of a fluid–solid interaction problem. Some numerical studies for simple model problems are presented to demonstrate various issues discussed here. The present study establishes the possible mathematical models and their limitations within the current knowledge of continuum mechanics that provide correct model for fluid–solid interaction.

[1]  M. Arienti,et al.  A level set approach to Eulerian-Lagrangian coupling , 2003 .

[2]  M. Crochet,et al.  The time-dependent flow of a viscoelastic fluid around a sphere , 1994 .

[3]  M. Souli,et al.  ALE formulation for fluid–structure interaction problems , 2000 .

[4]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for path-dependent materials , 1986 .

[5]  Kevin G. Wang,et al.  Algorithms for interface treatment and load computation in embedded boundary methods for fluid and fluid–structure interaction problems , 2011 .

[6]  C. Farhat,et al.  A dual‐primal FETI method for solving a class of fluid–structure interaction problems in the frequency domain , 2012 .

[7]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incompressible viscous flows☆ , 1981 .

[8]  B. C. Bell,et al.  p-version least squares finite element formulation for two-dimensional, incompressible, non-Newtonian isothermal and non-isothermal fluid flow , 1994 .

[9]  K. S. Surana,et al.  The K-Version of finite element method for nonlinear operators in bvp , 2004, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci..

[10]  Ronald Fedkiw,et al.  Numerically stable fluid-structure interactions between compressible flow and solid structures , 2011, J. Comput. Phys..

[11]  On the Stability of Linearized Reduced-Order Models: Descriptor vs Non-Descriptor Form and Application to Fluid-Structure Interaction , 2012 .

[12]  J. Reddy,et al.  The k-Version of Finite Element Method for Initial Value Problems: Mathematical and Computational Framework , 2007 .

[13]  A. Cemal Eringen,et al.  Mechanics of continua , 1967 .

[14]  J. Reddy An Introduction to Continuum Mechanics , 2007 .

[15]  A. Huerta,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian Methods , 2004 .

[16]  Robert C. Armstrong,et al.  Dynamics of polymeric liquids: Fluid mechanics , 1987 .

[17]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Computational algorithms for tracking dynamic fluid–structure interfaces in embedded boundary methods , 2012 .

[18]  R. Armstrong,et al.  Use of coupled birefringence and LDV studies of flow through a planar contraction to test constitutive equations for concentrated polymer solutions , 1995 .

[19]  S. Mittal,et al.  A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure. II: Computation of free-surface flows, two-liquid flows, and flows with drifting cylinders , 1992 .

[20]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Petrov-Galerkin finite elements for nonlinear continua , 1988 .

[21]  T. Belytschko,et al.  Robust and provably second‐order explicit–explicit and implicit–explicit staggered time‐integrators for highly non‐linear compressible fluid–structure interaction problems , 2010 .

[22]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Development of a Coupled and Unified Solution Method for Fluid-Structure Interactions , 2009 .

[23]  J. Halleux,et al.  An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions , 1982 .

[24]  Karan S. Surana,et al.  p‐version least squares finite element formulation for two‐dimensional, incompressible fluid flow , 1994 .

[25]  Wing Kam Liu,et al.  A METHOD OF COMPUTATION FOR FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION , 1984 .

[26]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  A new strategy for finite element computations involving moving boundaries and interfaces—the deforming-spatial-domain/space-time procedure. I: The concept and the preliminary numerical tests , 1992 .

[27]  Tayfun E. Tezduyar,et al.  Space-time finite element techniques for computation of fluid-structure interactions , 2005 .

[28]  C. W. Hirt,et al.  An Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian Computing Method for All Flow Speeds , 1997 .

[29]  K. Surana Advanced Mechanics of Continua , 2014 .

[30]  K. S. Surana,et al.  The k-Version of Finite Element Method for Self-Adjoint Operators in BVP , 2002, Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci..

[31]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Adaptive ALE finite elements with particular reference to external work rate on frictional interface , 1991 .

[32]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  Encyclopedia of computational mechanics , 2004 .

[33]  T. Tezduyar,et al.  Mesh Moving Techniques for Fluid-Structure Interactions With Large Displacements , 2003 .

[34]  J. Reddy,et al.  The Rate Constitutive Equations and Their Validity for Progressively Increasing Deformation , 2010 .

[35]  Robert C. Armstrong,et al.  Dynamics of polymeric liquids: Kinetic theory , 1987 .