PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article CAUSAL CAPTURE: Contextual Effects on the Perception of Collision Events

In addition to perceiving the colors, shapes, and motions of objects, observers can perceive higher-level properties of visual events. One such property is causation, as when an observer sees one object cause another object to move by colliding with it. We report a striking new type of contextual effect on the perception of such collision events. Consider an object (A) that moves toward a stationary object (B) until they are adjacent, at which point A stops and B starts moving along the same path. Such "launches" are perceived in terms beyond these kinematics: As noted in Michotte's classic studies, observers perceive A as being the cause of B's motion. When A and B fully overlap before B's motion, however observers often see this test event as a completely noncausal "pass": One object remains stationary while another passes over it. When a distinct launch event occurs nearby, however, the test event is "captured": It too is now irresistibly seen as causal. For this causal capture to occur, the context event need be present for only 50 ms surrounding the "impact," but capture is destroyed by only 200 ms of temporal asynchrony between the two events. We report a study of such cases, and others, that help define the rules that the visual system uses to construct percepts of seemingly high-level properties like causation.

[1]  M. Yela Phenomenal Causation at a Distance , 1952 .

[2]  A. Gemelli,et al.  The influence of the subject's attitude in perception , 1958 .

[3]  D. Boyle A Contribution to the Study of Phenomenal Causation* , 1960 .

[4]  T. Natsoulas Principles of momentum and kinetic energy in the perception of causality. , 1961, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield THE PERCEPTION OF CAUSALITY , 1963 .

[6]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[7]  S. Weir The Perception of Motion: Michotte Revisited , 1978 .

[8]  V. S. Ramachandran,et al.  Perceptual organization in moving patterns , 1983, Nature.

[9]  A. Leslie,et al.  Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? , 1987, Cognition.

[10]  P. White Causal Processing: Origins and Development , 1988 .

[11]  R. Day,et al.  Perceived Causality Occurs with Stroboscopic Movement of One or Both Stimulus Elements , 1990, Perception.

[12]  D. Shanks,et al.  Evidence for a Distinction between Judged and Perceived Causality , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[13]  N. Anderson,et al.  An information integration approach to phenomenal causality , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[14]  M. Morris,et al.  Culture and Cause: American and Chinese Attributions for Social and Physical Events , 1994 .

[15]  G. Butterworth,et al.  Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception , 1994 .

[16]  P. White The Understanding of Causation and the Production of Action , 1995 .

[17]  J. Kruschke,et al.  The perception of causality: Feature binding in interacting objects , 1996 .

[18]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Collisions between Moving Visual Targets: What Controls Alternative Ways of Seeing an Ambiguous Display? , 1999, Perception.

[19]  Alan B. Milne,et al.  Impressions of enforced disintegration and bursting in the visual perception of collision events , 1999 .

[20]  A. Schlottmann Is perception of causality modular? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Perceptual causality and animacy , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  S. Shimojo,et al.  When Sound Affects Vision: Effects of Auditory Grouping on Visual Motion Perception , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.