Computer Facilitated Reflective Practice in a Postgraduate Supervisor's Feedback to Students

Reflective practice has been adopted by many teachers, including dissertation advisors who provide 1:1 teaching of research students. This paper discusses issues arising from our use of qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) for reflective practice and provides an analysis of the thematic coding and word/pattern searches of feedback given to postgraduate research students. We subjected written feedback provided by one dissertation advisor to three different analyses: thematic, text-string and text-pattern search. We found that use of QDAS in a thematic analysis of feedback provides new insights by indicating areas of strength and areas for improvement. Text and pattern searches are more useful in flagging students with specific learning issues.

[1]  Robert Thompson.  Reporting the Results of Computer-assisted Analysis of Qualitative Research Data , 2002 .

[2]  Carol Grbich,et al.  Qualitative Research in Health: An Introduction , 1999 .

[3]  P. F. Colaizzi.  Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it , 1978 .

[4]  Mary Lacity,et al.  Understanding Qualitative Data: A Framework of Text Analysis Methods , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Peter Mertens,et al.  The PhD examination: support and training for supervisors and examiners , 2003 .

[6]  Alcione N. Ostorga.  Developing Teachers Who Are Reflective Practitioners: A Complex Process. , 2006 .

[7]  Kathryn Lenz.  Nontraditional‐Aged Women and the Dissertation: A Case Study Approach , 1997 .

[8]  S. McKenna.  Deconstructing a personal “academic”/“practitioner” narrative through self‐reflexivity , 2007 .

[9]  P. Johnson,et al.  The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research. , 2000, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[10]  D. Allen.  Ethnomethodological insights into insider-outsider relationships in nursing ethnographies of healthcare settings. , 2004, Nursing inquiry.

[11]  Arthur M. Cohen,et al.  UCLA Community College Review: Why Practitioners and Researchers Ignore Each Other (Even When They Are The Same Person) , 2005 .

[12]  Pauline Maclaran,et al.  Analysing qualitative data: computer software and the market research practitioner , 2002 .

[13]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  PhD Students' Evaluations of Research Supervision , 2002 .

[14]  Marilyn Hammick,et al.  Undergraduate research supervision: A gender analysis , 1998 .

[15]  Marydee A. Spillett,et al.  Cheerleader, Coach, Counselor, Critic: Support and Challenge Roles of the Dissertation Advisor , 2004 .

[16]  Clark E. Moustakas,et al.  Heuristic research: design, methodology, and applications , 1991, Choice Reviews Online.

[17]  Ortrun Zuber-Skerritt,et al.  A Constructivist Model for Evaluating Postgraduate Supervision: A Case Study. , 2004 .

[18]  M. Manen.  Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy , 1990 .

[19]  Elaine Welsh,et al.  Dealing with Data: Using NVivo in the Qualitative Data Analysis Process , 2002 .

[20]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[21]  Alan Bleakley,et al.  From reflective practice to holistic reflexivity , 1999 .

[22]  David Durian,et al.  Corpus-Based Text Analysis from a Qualitative Perspective: A Closer Look at NVivo , 2002 .

[23]  William P. Bintz,et al.  Teachers as Reflective Practitioners: Examining Teacher Stories of Curricular Change in a 4th Grade Classroom. , 2007 .

[24]  D. Schoen.  Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .