The implementation of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic

The present study examines the implementation of social robots in real settings during the COVID-19 pandemic. In particular, we analyze the areas in which social robots are being adopted, the roles and tasks being fulfilled, and the robot models being implemented. For that, we traced back and analyzed 195 experiences with 66 different social robots worldwide that have been adopted during the coronavirus outbreak. We identified a clear resurgence and expansion of social robots during the crisis. The social robots' capacity to perform the roles of liaison in tasks that require human-human interaction, to act as a safeguard to ensure contagion risk-free environments, and to act as well-being coaches by providing therapeutic and entertaining functions for quarantined patients, which are directly associated with the needs of facilitating physical distance and palliate the effects of isolation, have been key to the renaissance of these robots during the pandemic.

[1]  Mahdi Tavakoli,et al.  Robotics, Smart Wearable Technologies, and Autonomous Intelligent Systems for Healthcare During the COVID‐19 Pandemic: An Analysis of the State of the Art and Future Vision , 2020, Adv. Intell. Syst..

[2]  S. Tadokoro,et al.  Special project on development of advanced robots for disaster response (DDT project) , 2005, IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts, 2005..

[3]  G. Rubin,et al.  The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence , 2020, The Lancet.

[4]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Combating COVID-19—The role of robotics in managing public health and infectious diseases , 2020, Science Robotics.

[5]  C. Bartneck,et al.  A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[6]  Laura Aymerich-Franch,et al.  Why it is time to stop ostracizing social robots , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Design for Acceptability: Improving Robots’ Coexistence in Human Society , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[8]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[9]  Gerhard Sagerer,et al.  Understanding Social Robots , 2009, 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions.