Systematic review and meta-analysis of breast cancer brain metastasis and primary tumor receptor expression discordance

Abstract Background Change in hormone receptor (estrogen [ER] and progesterone [PR]) and/or human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2) status during the evolutionary course of metastatic breast cancer and the effect of tumor classification subtype switching remain understudied and underappreciated in brain metastasis patients. Methods Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of series published prior to April 2020 obtained from the Medline database of biopsied or resected breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) was performed. Weighted random effects models were used to calculate pooled estimates. Results 15 full-text articles were included with receptor expression analyses on 1373 patients who underwent biopsy or resection of at least one intracranial lesion to compare to the primary tumor. Primary tumor receptor expression immunophenotypes were 45.0% ER+, 41.0% ER−, 31.0% PR+, 51.0% PR−, 35% HER2+, and 47.0% HER2−. Corresponding BCBM immunophenotypes were 19.0% ER+, 31.0% ER−, 13.0% PR+, 40.0% PR−, 21.0% HER2+, and 26.0% HER2−. On primary/BCBM comparison, 540 patients (42.6%) exhibited discordance in any receptor with 17.0% (95% CI: 13.0%–23.0%) discordant on ER, 23.0% (95% CI: 18.0%–30.0%) discordant on PR, and 12.0% (95% CI: 8.0%–16.0%) discordant on HER2 status. The most common receptor conversions found in BCBM were ER loss 11.0% (95% CI: 8.0%–16.0%), PR loss 15.0% (95% CI: 11.0%–21.0%), and HER2 gain 9.0% (95% CI: 7.0%–11.0%). Conclusions BCBM exhibits significant receptor expression discordance in comparison to primary tumors in approximately 40% of patients. Classification patterns need to be analyzed to determine factors predictive of BCBM/primary tumor discordance. Overall, tumor subtype switching and its effect on clinical management remains underappreciated.

[1]  Huina Zhang,et al.  Applying the New Guidelines of HER2 Testing in Breast Cancer , 2020, Current Oncology Reports.

[2]  M. Ahluwalia,et al.  Current approaches to the management of brain metastases , 2020, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[3]  P. Brown,et al.  Beyond an Updated Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA): A Prognostic Index and Trends in Treatment and Survival in Breast Cancer Brain Metastases from 1985 to Today. , 2020, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  C. Lockwood,et al.  Beyond the Blood: CSF-Derived cfDNA for Diagnosis and Characterization of CNS Tumors , 2020, Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

[5]  P. Brown,et al.  Estrogen, Progesterone and HER2 Receptor Discordance Between Primary Tumor and Brain Metastases in Breast Cancer and Its Effect on Treatment and Survival. , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[6]  G. Barnett,et al.  Stereotactic radiosurgery with concurrent lapatinib is associated with improved local control for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. , 2020, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  Timothy R. Smith,et al.  Subtype switching in breast cancer brain metastases: a multicenter analysis , 2020, Neuro-oncology.

[8]  M. Campone,et al.  Impact of breast cancer molecular subtypes on the incidence, kinetics and prognosis of central nervous system metastases in a large multicentre real-life cohort , 2019, British Journal of Cancer.

[9]  F. Cardoso,et al.  Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[10]  E. Winer,et al.  TBCRC 022: A Phase II Trial of Neratinib and Capecitabine for Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer and Brain Metastases , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  Jaehag Jung,et al.  Discordances in ER, PR, and HER2 between primary breast cancer and brain metastasis , 2017, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[12]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Androgen and Estrogen Receptor Imaging in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients as a Surrogate for Tissue Biopsies , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  R. Goldbrunner,et al.  Discordance and Conversion Rates of Progesterone-, Estrogen-, and HER2/neu-Receptor Status in Primary Breast Cancer and Brain Metastasis Mainly Triggered by Hormone Therapy. , 2017, Anticancer research.

[14]  R. Jenkins,et al.  Changing molecular profile of brain metastases compared with matched breast primary cancers and impact on clinical outcomes , 2016, British Journal of Cancer.

[15]  Robert T. Jones,et al.  Genomic Characterization of Brain Metastases Reveals Branched Evolution and Potential Therapeutic Targets. , 2015, Cancer discovery.

[16]  K. Aldape,et al.  Breast cancer with brain metastases: clinicopathologic features, survival, and paired biomarker analysis. , 2015, The oncologist.

[17]  P. Barnes,et al.  CytoLyt® Fixation and Decalcification Pretreatments Alter Antigenicity in Normal Tissues Compared With Standard Formalin Fixation , 2015, Applied immunohistochemistry & molecular morphology : AIMM.

[18]  D. Wallwiener,et al.  Receptor change-clinicopathologic analysis of matched pairs of primary and cerebral metastatic breast cancer , 2013, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[19]  X. Pivot,et al.  Discordances in estrogen receptor status, progesterone receptor status, and HER2 status between primary breast cancer and metastasis. , 2013, The oncologist.

[20]  R. Dziadziuszko,et al.  Conversion of epidermal growth factor receptor 2 and hormone receptor expression in breast cancer metastases to the brain , 2012, Breast Cancer Research.

[21]  J. Bergh,et al.  Clinically used breast cancer markers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are unstable throughout tumor progression. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  Mark Clemons,et al.  Prospective study evaluating the impact of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  Xianghua Luo,et al.  Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  C. Hudis,et al.  Breast carcinoma with brain metastases: clinical analysis and immunoprofile on tissue microarrays. , 2011, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[25]  P. Tan,et al.  A subset of breast cancer predisposes to brain metastasis , 2011, Medical Molecular Morphology.

[26]  L. Pusztai,et al.  Stability of estrogen receptor status in breast carcinoma , 2011, Cancer.

[27]  A. Thompson,et al.  Prospective comparison of switches in biomarker status between primary and recurrent breast cancer: the Breast Recurrence In Tissues Study (BRITS) , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[28]  Pieter Wesseling,et al.  Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases , 2010, Breast Cancer Research.

[29]  Wolfgang Viechtbauer,et al.  Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package , 2010 .

[30]  M. Kurosumi,et al.  Immunohistochemical assessment of primary breast tumors and metachronous brain metastases, with particular regard to differences in the expression of biological markers and prognosis. , 2010, Experimental and therapeutic medicine.

[31]  Joshua F. McMichael,et al.  Genome Remodeling in a Basal-like Breast Cancer Metastasis and Xenograft , 2010, Nature.

[32]  A. Thompson,et al.  Surgical oncology: Why biopsying metastatic breast cancer should be routine , 2010, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[34]  I. Andrulis,et al.  Changes in estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her-2/neu status with time: discordance rates between primary and metastatic breast cancer. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[35]  G. Dranitsaris,et al.  Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases? , 2009, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[36]  R. Greil,et al.  Multicenter Phase II Study of Lapatinib in Patients with Brain Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer , 2009, Clinical Cancer Research.

[37]  M. Ono,et al.  Immunohistochemical profiles of brain metastases from breast cancer , 2008, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[38]  A. Gown Current issues in ER and HER2 testing by IHC in breast cancer , 2008, Modern Pathology.

[39]  A. D. Van den Abbeele,et al.  Phase II trial of lapatinib for brain metastases in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  Marc Ladanyi,et al.  Heterogeneity of Breast Cancer Metastases: Comparison of Therapeutic Target Expression and Promoter Methylation Between Primary Tumors and Their Multifocal Metastases , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[41]  A. Stan,et al.  Predominance of the basal type and HER-2/neu type in brain metastasis from breast cancer , 2007, Modern Pathology.

[42]  Lajos Pusztai,et al.  Determination of oestrogen-receptor status and ERBB2 status of breast carcinoma: a gene-expression profiling study. , 2007, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  G. Pond,et al.  Impact and perceptions of mandatory tumor biopsies for correlative studies in clinical trials of novel anticancer agents. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[44]  Peter A Kaufman,et al.  HER2 testing by local, central, and reference laboratories in specimens from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N9831 intergroup adjuvant trial. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[45]  E. D. de Vries,et al.  Indium-111-labeled trastuzumab scintigraphy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[46]  A E Ades,et al.  The Interpretation of Random-Effects Meta-Analysis in Decision Models , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[47]  E. Winer,et al.  CNS metastases in breast cancer. , 2004, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[48]  S. Thompson,et al.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis , 2002, Statistics in medicine.

[49]  J Isola,et al.  Loss of estrogen receptor in recurrent breast cancer is associated with poor response to endocrine therapy. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[50]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[51]  M. Campone,et al.  Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): a single-group phase 2 study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[52]  J. Bergh,et al.  HER2 status in a population-derived breast cancer cohort: discordances during tumor progression , 2010, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[53]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  Analyzing effect sizes: Random-effects models. , 2009 .

[54]  S. Kurbel Selective reduction of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer occurrence by estrogen receptor modulators supports etiological distinction between ER positive and ER negative breast cancers. , 2005, Medical hypotheses.

[55]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. , 1991, Journal of clinical epidemiology.