Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City

This paper examines the decentralization of employment using zip code data on employment by industry. Most American cities are decentralized on average less than 16 percent of employment in metropolitan areas is within a three mile radius of the city center. In decentralized cities, the classic stylized facts of urban economics (i.e. prices fall with distance to the city center, commute times rise with distance and poverty falls with distance) no longer hold. Decentralization is most common in manufacturing and least common in services. The human capital level of an industry predicts its centralization, but the dominant factor explaining decentralization is the residential preferences of workers. Political borders also impact employment density which suggests that local government policies significantly influence the location of industry.

[1]  R. Margo,et al.  Explaining the postwar suburbanization of population in the United States: the role of income. , 1992, Journal of urban economics.

[2]  P. McCann.  Urban and Regional Economics , 1991 .

[3]  Survivors Insurance,et al.  County business patterns , 1948 .

[4]  W. Wheaton,et al.  Income and Urban Residence: An Analysis of Consumer Demand for Location , 1974 .

[5]  K. Small,et al.  URBAN SPATIAL STRUCTURE. , 1997 .

[6]  M. White,et al.  Firm suburbanization and urban subcenters , 1976 .

[7]  W. Wheaton,et al.  Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets , 1995 .

[8]  G. Giuliano,et al.  SUBCENTERS IN THE LOS ANGELES REGION , 1991 .

[9]  W. Alonso.  Location And Land Use , 1964 .

[10]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  The Review of Economics and Statistics , 2002 .

[11]  Stephen L. Ross,et al.  Comparative static analysis of open urban models with a full labor market and suburban employment , 1995 .

[12]  R. Feenstra.  U.S. Exports, 1972-1994: With State Exports and Other U.S. Data , 1997 .

[13]  K. Small,et al.  Population and employment densities: structure and change. , 1993, Journal of urban economics.

[14]  P. Mann,et al.  The Growth of Cities in the Nineteenth Century: A Study in Statistics , 1968 .

[15]  M. Rossetti,et al.  JOURNEY TO WORK TRENDS IN THE UNITED STATES AND ITS MAJOR METROPOLITAN AREAS, 1960-1990. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[16]  Joel Garreau.  Edge City: Life on the New Frontier , 1991 .

[17]  M. Macauley.  Estimation and recent behavior of urban population and employment density gradients , 1985 .

[18]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Why Do the Poor Live in Cities? , 2000 .

[19]  Edward L. Glaeser,et al.  Are Cities Dying , 1998 .

[20]  Jon Sonstelie,et al.  The streetcar and residential location in nineteenth century Philadelphia , 1992 .

[21]  Jed Kolko.  Can I Get Some Service Here? Information Technology, Service Industries, and the Future of Cities , 1999 .

[22]  The tax treatment of housing: its effects on bounded and unbounded communities , 1998 .

[23]  E. Mills.  The measurement and determinants of suburbanization , 1992 .

[24]  M. White,et al.  Location Choice and Commuting Behavior in Cities with Decentralized Employment , 1988 .

[25]  Yves Zenou,et al.  Why is central Paris rich and downtown Detroit poor?: An amenity-based theory , 1999 .

[26]  M. Greenwood,et al.  Patterns of change in the intermetropolitan location of population, jobs, and housing: 1950 to 1980. , 1990, Journal of urban economics.

[27]  Gerald A. Carlino,et al.  Declining city productivity and the growth of rural regions: A test of alternative explanations , 1985 .

[28]  W. Gray,et al.  The NBER Manufacturing Productivity Database , 1996 .

[29]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization , 1968 .

[30]  P. Gordon,et al.  The influence of metropolitan spatial structure on commuting time , 1989 .

[31]  E. Mills,et al.  The Causes of Metropolitan Suburbanization , 1993 .

[32]  D. Schuyler.  The new urban landscape , 1986 .

[33]  Gerald A. Carlino,et al.  Contrasts in Agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh Reconsidered , 1980 .

[34]  Matthew E. Kahn.  The environmental impact of suburbanization , 2000 .

[35]  Timothy W. Cooke.  Testing a model of intraurban firm relocation , 1983 .

[36]  R. Voith.  Zoning and the Tax Treatment of Housing , 2000 .

[37]  I. Good,et al.  Fractals: Form, Chance and Dimension , 1978 .

[38]  Peter M. Mieszkowski,et al.  Analyzing urban decentralization : The case of Houston , 1991 .

[39]  A. Yezer,et al.  Causality in the Suburbanization of Population and Employment , 1994 .

[40]  John F. McDonald,et al.  Suburban Subcenters and Employment Density in Metropolitan Chicago , 1998 .

[41]  Jan K. Brueckner,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF URBAN EQUILIBRIA: A UNIFIED TREATMENT OF THE MUTH-MILLS MODEL* , 1987 .

[42]  J. Henderson,et al.  The new urban landscape: Developers and edge cities , 1996 .