Ecological Interface Design for Military Command and Control

The authors use the cognitive systems engineering framework to design and evaluate an interface for military command and control. They discuss analytic tools and principles of this framework and provide concrete examples (e.g., work domain analyses for U.S. Army tactical operations at the battalion level). They also discuss principles of ecological interface design, including direct perception, direct manipulation, and the perception-action loop. The translation between work domain analyses and the specific characteristics of the interface are made explicit. The authors describe the potential for this interface to support effective decision making and problem solving, including links with naturalistic decision-making approaches. Evaluations of the interface have been positive and are described briefly. Actual or potential applications of this research include both specific interface design strategies for military command and control and general interface design principles for this category of work domain.

[1]  G. Santucci,et al.  [Visual displays]. , 1981, L'Annee therapeutique et clinique en ophtalmologie.

[2]  Kevin B. Bennett,et al.  Objects and Mappings: Incompatible Principles of Display Design --- A Critique of Marino and Mahan , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[3]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Supporting knowledge-based behavior through ecological interface design , 1991 .

[4]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Cognitive Systems Engineering , 2022 .

[5]  Christopher P. Talcott,et al.  Perception-Action Icons: An Interface Design Strategy for Intermediate Domains , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[6]  William C. Elm,et al.  Case Studies: Applied Cognitive Work Analysis in the Design of Innovative Decision Support , 2003 .

[7]  Jens Rasmussen Ecological Interface Design For Complex Systems: An Example: SEAD UAV Systems , 1998 .

[8]  N. Naikar,et al.  Analysing activity in complex systems with cognitive work analysis: concepts, guidelines and case study for control task analysis , 2006 .

[9]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Ecological interfaces A technological imperative in high tech systems , 2002 .

[10]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Boundary, purpose, and values in work-domain models: models of naval command and control , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[11]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Information Processing and Human-Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[12]  K. J. Vicente,et al.  The Ecology of Human-Machine Systems II: Mediating 'Direct Perception' in Complex Work Domains , 1990 .

[13]  Olaf Oehme,et al.  Visual displays , 2002 .

[14]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[15]  Kevin B. Bennett,et al.  An Evaluation of a "Time Tunnel" Display Format for the Presentation of Temporal Information , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[16]  K B Bennett,et al.  Graphical Displays: Implications for Divided Attention, Focused Attention, and Problem Solving , 1992, Human factors.

[17]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Lessons From a Comparison of Work Domain Models: Representational Choices and Their Implications , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Gary Klein,et al.  Strategies of Decision Making , 1989 .

[19]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Skills, rules, and knowledge; signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[20]  Kevin B. Bennett,et al.  A preliminary investigation of the time tunnels display design technique , 2001 .

[21]  William B. Rouse,et al.  Advances in man-machine systems research : a research annual , 1984 .

[22]  John Paulin Hansen,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Configural, Digital, and Temporal Information on Process Displays , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[23]  James D. Hollan,et al.  Direct Manipulation Interfaces , 1985, Hum. Comput. Interact..