The work presented in this paper discusses the results of an initial qualitative experimental study towards the development of a communication tool with adaptive capabilities, which aims to facilitate group interaction, support the accomplishment of collaborative learning activities of different subject matters and promote the cultivation of cognitive and communication skills. The main objective of the experimental study was to observe how the process of the discussion, between pairs of students collaborating on the accomplishment of a learning activity, proceeds and to analyse their dialogue with respect to the cognitive skills that should be cultivated. In the framework of the study, we developed learning activities, addressing specific and similar cognitive skills, for three subject matters with different orientation. The students, who participated in the study, collaborated in an unstructured dialogue form using a computer-supported collaborative environment. Their dialogue was recorded in log files and was qualitatively analysed. The analysis revealed that the group dialogue presented similarities, as far as the structure and the use of specific phrases are concerned, in cases of collaborative learning activities addressing similar cognitive skills independently of the subject matter under consideration. Also, the analysis drew implications regarding the adaptivity of the communication tool on the basis of the cognitive skills that should be cultivated within the framework of each learning activity. The adaptive capabilities concern (i) the form of the dialogue supported (e.g. structured or unstructured, semi-structured or fully structured messages), and (ii) the “communicationscaffolding” tools (e.g. sentence openers, communication acts) provided, in order to support, facilitate and interpret the group dialogue.
[1]
Departamento de Ingeniería Eléctrica.
Analysing student interaction processes in order to improve collaboration . The DEGREE approach
,
2000
.
[2]
Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.
A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives
,
2000
.
[3]
Michael J. Baker,et al.
Promoting reflective interactions in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment
,
1997
.
[4]
Daniel D. Suthers,et al.
An Architecture for Intelligent Collaborative Educational Systems.
,
1997
.
[5]
Janyce Wiebe,et al.
A machine learning approach to assessing knowledge sharing during collaborative learning activities
,
2002,
CSCL.
[6]
David W. Johnson,et al.
Learning Together and Alone
,
1999
.
[7]
Richard E. Mayer,et al.
A taxonomy for computer-based assessment of problem solving
,
2002,
Comput. Hum. Behav..
[8]
Maria Samarakou,et al.
Supporting collaboration and adaptation in a CSCL environment
,
2003,
Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Conference on Advanced Technologies.
[9]
Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.
Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design
,
2002
.
[10]
Judy Robertson,et al.
BetterBlether: The Design and Evaluation of a Discussion Tool for education
,
1998
.
[11]
Amy Soller,et al.
Supporting Social Interaction in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning System
,
2001
.