Rheological properties of nanocellulose suspensions: effects of fibril/particle dimensions and surface characteristics

The rheological properties of aqueous suspensions based on three different nanocelluloses were compared. One system was obtained via acid hydrolysis (thus yielding crystalline nanocellulose, CNC) and the other two from mechanical shearing, but from different origins and subjected to different pretreatments. Of the latter two, one was considered to be a rather typical cellulose nanofibril (CNF) suspension whereas the other was a kind of intermediate between CNF and CNC. All three nanocellulose elements differed in dimensions as evident from transmission electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. With regard to the length of the fibrils/particles, the three nanocelluloses formed three distinct groups with lengths between 200 and slightly more than 800 nm. The three cellulosic elements were also subjected to a TEMPO-mediated oxidation yielding a similar carboxylate content in the three systems. Furthermore, the TEMPO-oxidized elements were grafted with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG). The amount of grafted PEG was about 35 wt%. The shear viscosity, the storage modulus and the loss modulus of suspensions of the unmodified, the TEMPO-oxidized and the grafted nanocelluloses were determined at room temperature and the solids content of the suspensions was varied between 0.7 and 2.0 wt%. It was concluded that the rheological properties varied significantly between the suspensions depending on the dimensions of the cellulosic elements and their surface characteristics. In this context, the length (or the aspect ratio) of the particles played a very important role.

[1]  Saad A. Khan,et al.  Process scale up and characterization of wood cellulose nanocrystals hydrolysed using bioethanol pilot plant , 2014 .

[2]  S. Hatzikiriakos,et al.  Influence of degree of sulfation on the rheology of cellulose nanocrystal suspensions , 2013, Rheologica Acta.

[3]  Quianquian Wang,et al.  Effects of mechanical fibrillation time by disk grinding on the properties of cellulose nanofibrils , 2016 .

[4]  Gunnar Westman,et al.  Cationic surface functionalization of cellulose nanocrystals , 2008 .

[5]  M. Skrifvars,et al.  All-cellulose nanocomposite fibers produced by melt spinning cellulose acetate butyrate and cellulose nanocrystals , 2014, Cellulose.

[6]  Gunnar Henriksson,et al.  An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers , 2007 .

[7]  R. Hill Elastic modulus of microfibrillar cellulose gels. , 2008, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  Xuezhu Xu,et al.  Cellulose nanocrystals vs. cellulose nanofibrils: a comparative study on their microstructures and effects as polymer reinforcing agents. , 2013, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[9]  A. Naderi,et al.  A comparative study of the rheological properties of three different nanofibrillated cellulose systems , 2016 .

[10]  M. Rigdahl,et al.  Effect of carbon black on electrical and rheological properties of graphite nanoplatelets/poly(ethylene-butyl acrylate) composites , 2015 .

[11]  F. Jiang,et al.  Acid-catalyzed and solvolytic desulfation of H2SO4-hydrolyzed cellulose nanocrystals. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  P. Mongondry,et al.  Mild Synthesis of Amino-Poly(ethylene glycol)s. Application to Steric Stabilization of Clays , 2003 .

[13]  A. Naderi,et al.  Carboxymethylated nanofibrillated cellulose: rheological studies , 2014, Cellulose.

[14]  Pirjo Pietikäinen,et al.  Effect of cationic polymethacrylates on the rheology and flocculation of microfibrillated cellulose , 2011 .

[15]  A. Naderi,et al.  A comparative study of the properties of three nanofibrillated cellulose systems that have been produced at about the same energy consumption levels in the mechanical delamination step , 2016 .

[16]  O. Ikkala,et al.  Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. , 2007, Biomacromolecules.

[17]  Akira Isogai,et al.  TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers. , 2011, Nanoscale.

[18]  Kentaro Abe,et al.  Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites , 2010, Journal of Materials Science.

[19]  Ichiro Sakurada,et al.  Experimental determination of the elastic modulus of crystalline regions in oriented polymers , 1962 .

[20]  M. Rigdahl,et al.  On the viscoelastic properties of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) suspensions , 2012 .

[21]  Qi Zhou,et al.  Preparation and Viscoelastic Properties of Composite Fibres Containing Cellulose Nanofibrils , 2016 .

[22]  Kristiina Oksman,et al.  On the use of nanocellulose as reinforcement in polymer matrix composites , 2014 .

[23]  Magnus Norgren,et al.  The build-up of polyelectrolyte multilayers of microfibrillated cellulose and cationic polyelectrolytes. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[24]  H. Barnes,et al.  An introduction to rheology , 1989 .

[25]  K. R. Sandberg,et al.  Microfibrillated cellulose, a new cellulose product: properties, uses, and commercial potential , 1983 .

[26]  M. Stading,et al.  Extensional viscosity of microfibrillated cellulose suspensions. , 2014, Carbohydrate polymers.

[27]  Øyvind Weiby Gregersen,et al.  Rheological Studies of Microfibrillar Cellulose Water Dispersions , 2011 .

[28]  Qi Zhou,et al.  A Transparent, Hazy, and Strong Macroscopic Ribbon of Oriented Cellulose Nanofibrils Bearing Poly(ethylene glycol) , 2015, Advanced materials.

[29]  Ivan Usov,et al.  FiberApp: An Open-Source Software for Tracking and Analyzing Polymers, Filaments, Biomacromolecules, and Fibrous Objects , 2015 .

[30]  Christopher W. Macosko,et al.  Processing-property relationships of polycarbonate/graphene composites , 2009 .

[31]  M. Schubert,et al.  THE DIFFERENCE IN PERMEABILITY OF CARTILAGE TO CATIONIC AND ANIONIC DYES , 1957, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[32]  Safran,et al.  Percolation in interacting colloids. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.